block status (was Re: ApplesProcessor - a little crazy idea)

[Ralph Goers <Ra...@dslextreme.com>]

Reinhard Poetz wrote:

> Ralph Goers wrote:
>
>> I don't recall the last discussion. Obviously, if there was an 
>> agreement nothing was done about it.
>>
>> Currently gump.xml only has status="value".  How do the 3 parts get 
>> reflected into that?  How does the fact that the api is stable but 
>> the implementation needs to be verified get presented so that we can 
>> easily see that?
>
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/trunk/src/schema/cob-schema-1.0.xsd 
>
>
> --> see the complex type "state"

Right.  And then I searched for all usages of the schema and came up 
with 2 block.xml files, neither of which specify this. 

In other words, nothing has been done about it.

Ralph

Re: block status (was Re: ApplesProcessor - a little crazy idea)

[Reinhard Poetz <re...@apache.org>]

Ralph Goers wrote:
> Reinhard Poetz wrote:
> 
>> Ralph Goers wrote:
>>
>>> I don't recall the last discussion. Obviously, if there was an 
>>> agreement nothing was done about it.
>>>
>>> Currently gump.xml only has status="value".  How do the 3 parts get 
>>> reflected into that?  How does the fact that the api is stable but 
>>> the implementation needs to be verified get presented so that we can 
>>> easily see that?
>>
>>
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/trunk/src/schema/cob-schema-1.0.xsd 
>>
>>
>> --> see the complex type "state"
> 
> 
> Right.  And then I searched for all usages of the schema and came up 
> with 2 block.xml files, neither of which specify this.
> In other words, nothing has been done about it.

Yes, we have to do it, but the procedure *how* we do it has already been defined.

-- 
Reinhard Pötz           Independent Consultant, Trainer & (IT)-Coach 

{Software Engineering, Open Source, Web Applications, Apache Cocoon}

                                        web(log): http://www.poetz.cc
--------------------------------------------------------------------