You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@cxf.apache.org by "Sergey Beryozkin (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/03/31 14:46:24 UTC
[jira] Commented: (CXF-1494) Issue Using JAX-RS / REST When AOP
Proxy In Place
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12583667#action_12583667 ]
Sergey Beryozkin commented on CXF-1494:
---------------------------------------
> Is there a reason that, if the instance of the class that JAX-RS sees is a proxy object, that it can't get the underlying class information by drilling into the proxy object
It makes sense but I reckon there's a (slim) possibility of the resource class itself being a proxy ?
Perhaps we can do
<jaxrs:server id="services" address="/" proxyAware="true">
<jaxrs:serviceBeans>
<ref bean="test1" />
<ref bean="test2" />
<ref bean="test3" />
</jaxrs:serviceBeans>
</jaxrs:server>
thus giving an explicit indication to JAX-RS runtime that it's ok to attempt to introspect Proxy instances further ?
> Issue Using JAX-RS / REST When AOP Proxy In Place
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-1494
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1494
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: REST
> Affects Versions: 2.1
> Reporter: Steve Ardis
>
> If your beans.xml contains the following entry:
> <jaxrs:server id="services" address="/">
> <jaxrs:serviceBeans>
> <ref bean="test" />
> </jaxrs:serviceBeans>
> </jaxrs:server>
> <bean id="test" class="test.rest.Test" />
> And you have a Spring AOP pointcut defined as:
> <aop:config>
> <aop:pointcut id="testOperations" expression="execution(* test.rest.*.*(..))" />
> <aop:advisor advice-ref="transactionAdvice" pointcut-ref="testOperations" />
> </aop:config>
> no mapping to the test bean are mapped and method cannot be invoked - it fails with "No operation found for path: /test/string/"
> If you comment out the contents of <aop:config> everything works fine.
> This link describes the problem with JAX-WS and the same issue probably applies to JAX-RS:
> http://incubator.apache.org/cxf/faq.html#FAQ-WhenusingSpringAOPtoenablethingsliketransactionsandsecurity%252CthegeneratedWSDLisverymessedupwithwrongnamespaces%252Cpartnames%252Cetc...
> However, the solution provided in the link does not work due to differences in the APIs between JAX-WS and JAX-RS.
> I have a dumbed-down Maven project that I can zip up and provide if necessary.
> Is there a suggested way around this problem for JAX-RS?
> Is there a reason that, if the instance of the class that JAX-RS sees is a proxy object, that it can't get the underlying class information by drilling into the proxy object, thereby eliminating the necessity to define the serviceClass information (as in the JAX-WS "fix")? Ideally , I'd like to be able to do the following:
> <jaxrs:server id="services" address="/">
> <jaxrs:serviceBeans>
> <ref bean="test1" />
> <ref bean="test2" />
> <ref bean="test3" />
> </jaxrs:serviceBeans>
> </jaxrs:server>
> without having to define separate jaxrs server(s) (as in the JAX-WS "fix").
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.