You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@spark.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/09/30 02:17:40 UTC

[GitHub] [spark] itholic opened a new pull request, #38055: [SPARK-40590][TEST] Fix `ps.read_parquet` when `pandas_metadata` is `True`

itholic opened a new pull request, #38055:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/38055

   <!--
   Thanks for sending a pull request!  Here are some tips for you:
     1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: https://spark.apache.org/contributing.html
     2. Ensure you have added or run the appropriate tests for your PR: https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html
     3. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., '[WIP][SPARK-XXXX] Your PR title ...'.
     4. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes.
     5. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes.
     6. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a faster review.
     7. If you want to add a new configuration, please read the guideline first for naming configurations in
        'core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/ConfigEntry.scala'.
     8. If you want to add or modify an error type or message, please read the guideline first in
        'core/src/main/resources/error/README.md'.
   -->
   
   ### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   <!--
   Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue. 
   If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster reviews in your PR. See the examples below.
     1. If you refactor some codes with changing classes, showing the class hierarchy will help reviewers.
     2. If you fix some SQL features, you can provide some references of other DBMSes.
     3. If there is design documentation, please add the link.
     4. If there is a discussion in the mailing list, please add the link.
   -->
   
   This PR proposes to skip the `ps.read_parquet` since the `pd.to_parquet` is broken when the index is `MultiIndex` from pandas 1.5.0.
   
   We leverage the `pd.to_parquet` in the test, so the test failed with pandas 1.5.0 as below:
   ```python
   DataFrame shape mismatch
   [left]:  (20, 5)
   [right]: (20, 4)
   
   Left:
       i32  i64     f  bhello     index
   0     0    0   0.0      yo  0.617492
   1     1    1   1.0  people  0.823826
   2     2    2   2.0  people  0.443275
   3     0    3   3.0   hello  0.639776
   4     1    4   4.0      yo  0.393410
   5     2    0   5.0      yo  0.898860
   6     0    1   6.0  people  0.725236
   7     1    2   7.0      yo  0.933009
   8     2    3   8.0      yo  0.663381
   9     0    4   9.0   hello  0.471077
   10    1    0  10.0   hello  0.562182
   11    2    1  11.0  people  0.734902
   12    0    2  12.0      yo  0.956519
   13    1    3  13.0   hello  0.860517
   14    2    4  14.0  people  0.012749
   15    0    0  15.0  people  0.561815
   16    1    1  16.0  people  0.389130
   17    2    2  17.0   hello  0.930301
   18    0    3  18.0   hello  0.835025
   19    1    4  19.0      yo  0.212191
   i32         int32
   i64         int64
   f         float64
   bhello     object
   index     float64
   dtype: object
   
   Right:
                i32  i64     f  bhello
      index                           
   0  0.617492    0    0   0.0      yo
   1  0.823826    1    1   1.0  people
   2  0.443275    2    2   2.0  people
   3  0.639776    0    3   3.0   hello
   4  0.393410    1    4   4.0      yo
   5  0.898860    2    0   5.0      yo
   6  0.725236    0    1   6.0  people
   7  0.933009    1    2   7.0      yo
   8  0.663381    2    3   8.0      yo
   9  0.471077    0    4   9.0   hello
   10 0.562182    1    0  10.0   hello
   11 0.734902    2    1  11.0  people
   12 0.956519    0    2  12.0      yo
   13 0.860517    1    3  13.0   hello
   14 0.012749    2    4  14.0  people
   15 0.561815    0    0  15.0  people
   16 0.389130    1    1  16.0  people
   17 0.930301    2    2  17.0   hello
   18 0.835025    0    3  18.0   hello
   19 0.212191    1    4  19.0      yo
   i32         int32
   i64         int64
   f         float64
   bhello     object
   dtype: object
   ```
   
   ### Why are the changes needed?
   <!--
   Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance,
     1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API.
     2. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug.
   -->
   
   We should make the all test passing with pandas 1.5.0.
   
   ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
   <!--
   Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such as the documentation fix.
   If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes - provide the console output, description and/or an example to show the behavior difference if possible.
   If possible, please also clarify if this is a user-facing change compared to the released Spark versions or within the unreleased branches such as master.
   If no, write 'No'.
   -->
   
   No.
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   <!--
   If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive cases if possible.
   If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future.
   If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why it was difficult to add.
   If benchmark tests were added, please run the benchmarks in GitHub Actions for the consistent environment, and the instructions could accord to: https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html#github-workflow-benchmarks.
   -->
   
   Manually test with pandas 1.5.0.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] [spark] itholic commented on pull request #38055: [SPARK-40590][TEST] Fix `ps.read_parquet` when `pandas_metadata` is `True`

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
itholic commented on PR #38055:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/38055#issuecomment-1269367816

   cc @HyukjinKwon Can you take a look when you find some time? The comment is resolved


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] [spark] itholic commented on a diff in pull request #38055: [SPARK-40590][TEST] Fix `ps.read_parquet` when `pandas_metadata` is `True`

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
itholic commented on code in PR #38055:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/38055#discussion_r984153195


##########
python/pyspark/pandas/tests/test_dataframe_spark_io.py:
##########
@@ -96,11 +97,18 @@ def test_parquet_read_with_pandas_metadata(self):
             self.assert_eq(ps.read_parquet(path2, pandas_metadata=True), expected2)
 
             expected3 = expected2.set_index("index", append=True)
+            # There is a bug in `to_parquet` from pandas 1.5.0 when writing MultiIndex.
+            # See https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/48848 for the reported issue.

Review Comment:
   Here is the related discussion with pandas community in the pandas repo, and confirmed as regression.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] [spark] HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in pull request #38055: [SPARK-40590][TEST] Fix `ps.read_parquet` when `pandas_metadata` is `True`

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
HyukjinKwon commented on code in PR #38055:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/38055#discussion_r985016033


##########
python/pyspark/pandas/tests/test_dataframe_spark_io.py:
##########
@@ -96,11 +97,18 @@ def test_parquet_read_with_pandas_metadata(self):
             self.assert_eq(ps.read_parquet(path2, pandas_metadata=True), expected2)
 
             expected3 = expected2.set_index("index", append=True)
+            # There is a bug in `to_parquet` from pandas 1.5.0 when writing MultiIndex.
+            # See https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/48848 for the reported issue.
+            if LooseVersion(pd.__version__) >= LooseVersion("1.5.0"):

Review Comment:
   ```suggestion
               if LooseVersion(pd.__version__) == LooseVersion("1.5.0"):
   ```
   
   maybe .. since it's going to be fixed in 1.5.1 presumably.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] [spark] HyukjinKwon closed pull request #38055: [SPARK-40590][TEST] Fix `ps.read_parquet` when `pandas_metadata` is `True`

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
HyukjinKwon closed pull request #38055: [SPARK-40590][TEST] Fix `ps.read_parquet` when `pandas_metadata` is `True`
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/38055


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] [spark] HyukjinKwon commented on pull request #38055: [SPARK-40590][TEST] Fix `ps.read_parquet` when `pandas_metadata` is `True`

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
HyukjinKwon commented on PR #38055:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/38055#issuecomment-1269436846

   Merged to master.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org