You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@maven.apache.org by "Benjamin Marwell (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/12/14 11:53:00 UTC

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (MCHECKSTYLE-264) Should checkstyle check the license of a file

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MCHECKSTYLE-264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Benjamin Marwell updated MCHECKSTYLE-264:
-----------------------------------------
    Comment: was deleted

(was: I forgot the Licence header in a new file and the check already failed. I think this can be closed now.)

> Should checkstyle check the license of a file
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MCHECKSTYLE-264
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MCHECKSTYLE-264
>             Project: Maven Checkstyle Plugin
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Karl Heinz Marbaise
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Currently i have issues related to that checkstyle checks the license of a file and apache-rat-plugin will do as well. This is from my point of view duplicated....The question which of the plugins should be responsible for licenses. I would vote for apache-rat-plugin?
> In the example in JXR i have to make a configuration for apache-rat-plugin and for checkstyle plugin.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)