Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x

[Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>]

Below is an small update on current status for Lift 2.4 branch.

Lift-2.4M4 was announced yesterday:
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/f695772c254219b2

I've updated project files to new version, but it doesn't compile due to
changes in Loc.Snippet class (it's neccessary to explicitly specify _ in
order to compiler recognize that Snippet's parameter is a function). See
following link for more details:

http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply()+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1

I suppose this issue is easy to fix, but it will take some time for me due
to extremly high workload (even on this weekend :s( ).

M4 will also make possible moving to 2.9.1 Scala version (after all
dependencies are updated accordingly).

Vladimir

2011/7/27 <in...@gmail.com>

> Going by the content of the discussion on this topic for the last couple of
> days, it should be possible for Vladimir to implement the replacement, if
> not just port the code from the old Ostrich code base.
>
> Hope he finds the time and the inclination!
>
> Imtiaz
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" <hirsch.dick@gmail.com
> >
> To: <de...@esme.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8:33 PM
> Subject: Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x
>
>
>
>  I think they (twitter) decided that the HTTP-based stats was enough or
>> the JMX scala code conflicted with the new Scala version.
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, I wasn't able to find any replacement too. I also tried to find any
>>> forum or group to ask about this modification, but it seems there's no
>>> other
>>> resources dedicated to this project besides GitHub.
>>>
>>> Next step is to find the reason of failed tests.
>>>
>>
>> OK - sounds good
>>
>>
>>> Vladimir
>>>
>>> 2011/7/27 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>  Looked at the code last night and this morning. The JMX support has
>>>> been totally removed.
>>>>
>>>> I had a quick look and didn't find anything that might be a
>>>> replacement. In the meantime, we'll have to just use the HTTP-based
>>>> interface.
>>>>
>>>> D.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <lester.mail@gmail.com
>>>> >
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > Thank you, Dick!
>>>> >
>>>> > Here is the link to Ostrich's GitHub repo changeset with StatsMBean >
>>>> class
>>>> > removed:
>>>> >
>>>> https://github.com/twitter/**ostrich/commit/**
>>>> 5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78**309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/**
>>>> twitter/ostrich<https://github.com/twitter/ostrich/commit/5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/twitter/ostrich>
>>>> >
>>>> > May be it helps somehow.
>>>> >
>>>> > Vladimir
>>>> >
>>>> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>>>> >
>>>> >> OK - I'll take a look at it tonight
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov >> <
>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
>>>> >
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >> > Yes, I had to comment it out.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >> Great.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> Let me take a look for the StatsMBean replacement. Did you comment
>>>> out
>>>> >> >> the usage of StatsMBean to get ESME to compile?
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> D.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >> wrote:
>>>> >> >> > Configgy is not used for configuration anymore
>>>> >> >> > - Package and method names were changed
>>>> >> >> > - There's no more StatsMBean class (and I have no idea whether
>>>> >> >> > any
>>>> >> >> > replacement is available).
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > --
>>>> >> > Best Regards,
>>>> >> > Vladimir Ivanov
>>>> >> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Best Regards,
>>>> > Vladimir Ivanov
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Vladimir Ivanov
>>>
>>>
>


-- 
Best Regards,
Vladimir Ivanov

Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x

[Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>]

Richard,

Exactly ;s)

Thank you!

15 сентября 2011 г. 17:56 пользователь Richard Hirsch <hirsch.dick@gmail.com
> написал:

> No risk - no fun -
>
> The current version is now deployed on our cloudbees instance --
> http://esmecloudserverapache.dickhirsch.staxapps.net
>
> D.
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I guess yes if we decided to work with 2.4 version in it's current state.
> >
> > Vladimir
> >
> > 2011/9/15 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> >
> >> Should I deploy this version on our CloudBees instance?
> >>
> >> D.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> lester.mail@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > Lift 2.4 branch has been merged back into trunk.
> >> >
> >> > Please be aware about possible problems in CSS Selectors in 2.4
> version:
> >> >
> >> > https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1110
> >> > https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1111
> >> > https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1114
> >> >
> >> > Vladimir
> >> >
> >> > 14 сентября 2011 г. 17:10 пользователь Ethan Jewett <
> esjewett@gmail.com
> >> >написал:
> >> >
> >> >> Sounds good!
> >> >>
> >> >> 2011/9/14 Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>:
> >> >> > Ok, if you guys don't mind I'll merge Lift 2.4 branch back into
> trunk
> >> >> > (hopefully this evening).
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Vladimir
> >> >> >
> >> >> > 2011/9/13 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> I agree - work in the trunk - I assume that Lift 2.4 should be
> >> >> >> finished by the time we release 1.4.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> D
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Ethan Jewett <esjewett@gmail.com
> >
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> > Hi Vladimir and all,
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Hmmm, I guess it depends on whether or not upgrading is required
> >> for
> >> >> >> > our 1.4 release. Personally, I think that because of the Textile
> >> fixes
> >> >> >> > (at least) we should shoot to include it, in which case we could
> >> merge
> >> >> >> > it back in without waiting. This would result in it getting more
> >> >> >> > testing from me, since I at least am developing on trunk and not
> >> the
> >> >> >> > Lift 2.4 branch.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Thoughts?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Ethan
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > 2011/9/13 Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>:
> >> >> >> >> Hi Ethan,
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Sorry for the late response.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> I've fixed сompile-time errors and commited changes, but I
> think
> >> we
> >> >> need
> >> >> >> >> more time to test it. Moreover I had to remove some members
> from
> >> >> >> MsgParser
> >> >> >> >> class because they dublicated definitions in Textile's
> superclass
> >> (in
> >> >> >> its
> >> >> >> >> new version). Some of them were exactly the same, other were
> >> slightly
> >> >> >> >> different. So it would be ideal if Vassil find time to review
> it.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> I would wait for at least RC, but if you guys decide that it's
> >> >> >> neccessary
> >> >> >> >> right now - why not?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Vladimir
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> 2011/9/11 Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>> Hi Vladimir,
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> Seems like we should get the branch merged back in to trunk
> soon.
> >> Do
> >> >> >> >>> you think it would be best to do that on the current 2.4M4, or
> >> would
> >> >> >> >>> it be wiser to wait until later?
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> Ethan
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> >> >> >> lester.mail@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> > As Vassil noted, the most important one is Textile update.
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>> > Among other fixes I would also mention fix for dublicated
> >> context
> >> >> >> path
> >> >> >> >>> > problem:
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1082-redirectresponse-duplicates-contextpath
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>> > There were many reports and question on StackOverflow
> regarding
> >> >> this
> >> >> >> >>> issue.
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>> > Vladimir
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>> > 2011/9/10 Vassil Dichev <vd...@apache.org>
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> It should fix the long-standing ESME-307 (Textile and
> >> >> punctuation)
> >> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Richard Hirsch <
> >> >> >> hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> >>> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> >> > Thanks for the update.
> >> >> >> >>> >> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> > Are there any new features in the release that might be
> of
> >> >> >> interest to
> >> >> >> >>> >> ESME?
> >> >> >> >>> >> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> > D.
> >> >> >> >>> >> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> >> >> >> >>> lester.mail@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> >>> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> >> >> Below is an small update on current status for Lift 2.4
> >> >> branch.
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >> Lift-2.4M4 was announced yesterday:
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/f695772c254219b2
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >> I've updated project files to new version, but it
> doesn't
> >> >> compile
> >> >> >> due
> >> >> >> >>> to
> >> >> >> >>> >> >> changes in Loc.Snippet class (it's neccessary to
> explicitly
> >> >> >> specify _
> >> >> >> >>> in
> >> >> >> >>> >> >> order to compiler recognize that Snippet's parameter is
> a
> >> >> >> function).
> >> >> >> >>> See
> >> >> >> >>> >> >> following link for more details:
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply()+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1
> >> >> >> <
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply%28%29+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >> I suppose this issue is easy to fix, but it will take
> some
> >> >> time
> >> >> >> for
> >> >> >> >>> me
> >> >> >> >>> >> due
> >> >> >> >>> >> >> to extremly high workload (even on this weekend :s( ).
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >> M4 will also make possible moving to 2.9.1 Scala version
> >> >> (after
> >> >> >> all
> >> >> >> >>> >> >> dependencies are updated accordingly).
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >> Vladimir
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >> 2011/7/27 <in...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> Going by the content of the discussion on this topic
> for
> >> the
> >> >> >> last
> >> >> >> >>> >> couple of
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> days, it should be possible for Vladimir to implement
> the
> >> >> >> >>> replacement,
> >> >> >> >>> >> if
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> not just port the code from the old Ostrich code base.
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> Hope he finds the time and the inclination!
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> Imtiaz
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" <
> >> >> >> >>> >> hirsch.dick@gmail.com
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> To: <de...@esme.apache.org>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8:33 PM
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> Subject: Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>  I think they (twitter) decided that the HTTP-based
> stats
> >> was
> >> >> >> enough
> >> >> >> >>> or
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>> the JMX scala code conflicted with the new Scala
> version.
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> >> >> >> >>> >> lester.mail@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Yes, I wasn't able to find any replacement too. I
> also
> >> >> tried
> >> >> >> to
> >> >> >> >>> find
> >> >> >> >>> >> any
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> forum or group to ask about this modification, but it
> >> seems
> >> >> >> >>> there's
> >> >> >> >>> >> no
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> other
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> resources dedicated to this project besides GitHub.
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Next step is to find the reason of failed tests.
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>> OK - sounds good
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Vladimir
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> 2011/7/27 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>  Looked at the code last night and this morning. The
> JMX
> >> >> >> support
> >> >> >> >>> has
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> been totally removed.
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> I had a quick look and didn't find anything that
> might
> >> be
> >> >> a
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> replacement. In the meantime, we'll have to just use
> >> the
> >> >> >> >>> HTTP-based
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> interface.
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> D.
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> >> >> >> >>> >> lester.mail@gmail.com
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Thank you, Dick!
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Here is the link to Ostrich's GitHub repo
> changeset
> >> with
> >> >> >> >>> >> StatsMBean >
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> class
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > removed:
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> https://github.com/twitter/**ostrich/commit/**
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> 5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78**309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/**
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> twitter/ostrich<
> >> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/twitter/ostrich/commit/5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/twitter/ostrich
> >> >> >> >>> >> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > May be it helps somehow.
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> OK - I'll take a look at it tonight
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov
> >>
> >> <
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Yes, I had to comment it out.
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <
> hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> Great.
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> Let me take a look for the StatsMBean
> >> replacement.
> >> >> Did
> >> >> >> you
> >> >> >> >>> >> comment
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> out
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> the usage of StatsMBean to get ESME to
> compile?
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> D.
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Vladimir
> Ivanov
> >> <
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > Configgy is not used for configuration
> anymore
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - Package and method names were changed
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - There's no more StatsMBean class (and I
> have
> >> no
> >> >> >> idea
> >> >> >> >>> >> whether
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > any
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > replacement is available).
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > --
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Best Regards,
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Vladimir Ivanov
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > --
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Best Regards,
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir Ivanov
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> --
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Best Regards,
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Vladimir Ivanov
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >> --
> >> >> >> >>> >> >> Best Regards,
> >> >> >> >>> >> >> Vladimir Ivanov
> >> >> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >> >
> >> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>> > --
> >> >> >> >>> > Best Regards,
> >> >> >> >>> > Vladimir Ivanov
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> >> Best Regards,
> >> >> >> >> Vladimir Ivanov
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > Best Regards,
> >> >> > Vladimir Ivanov
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Best Regards,
> >> > Vladimir Ivanov
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> > Vladimir Ivanov
> >
>



-- 
Best Regards,
Vladimir Ivanov

Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x

[Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>]

No risk - no fun -

The current version is now deployed on our cloudbees instance --
http://esmecloudserverapache.dickhirsch.staxapps.net

D.

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I guess yes if we decided to work with 2.4 version in it's current state.
>
> Vladimir
>
> 2011/9/15 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>
>> Should I deploy this version on our CloudBees instance?
>>
>> D.
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Lift 2.4 branch has been merged back into trunk.
>> >
>> > Please be aware about possible problems in CSS Selectors in 2.4 version:
>> >
>> > https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1110
>> > https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1111
>> > https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1114
>> >
>> > Vladimir
>> >
>> > 14 сентября 2011 г. 17:10 пользователь Ethan Jewett <esjewett@gmail.com
>> >написал:
>> >
>> >> Sounds good!
>> >>
>> >> 2011/9/14 Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>:
>> >> > Ok, if you guys don't mind I'll merge Lift 2.4 branch back into trunk
>> >> > (hopefully this evening).
>> >> >
>> >> > Vladimir
>> >> >
>> >> > 2011/9/13 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> >> >
>> >> >> I agree - work in the trunk - I assume that Lift 2.4 should be
>> >> >> finished by the time we release 1.4.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> D
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > Hi Vladimir and all,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Hmmm, I guess it depends on whether or not upgrading is required
>> for
>> >> >> > our 1.4 release. Personally, I think that because of the Textile
>> fixes
>> >> >> > (at least) we should shoot to include it, in which case we could
>> merge
>> >> >> > it back in without waiting. This would result in it getting more
>> >> >> > testing from me, since I at least am developing on trunk and not
>> the
>> >> >> > Lift 2.4 branch.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thoughts?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Ethan
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > 2011/9/13 Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>:
>> >> >> >> Hi Ethan,
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Sorry for the late response.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I've fixed сompile-time errors and commited changes, but I think
>> we
>> >> need
>> >> >> >> more time to test it. Moreover I had to remove some members from
>> >> >> MsgParser
>> >> >> >> class because they dublicated definitions in Textile's superclass
>> (in
>> >> >> its
>> >> >> >> new version). Some of them were exactly the same, other were
>> slightly
>> >> >> >> different. So it would be ideal if Vassil find time to review it.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I would wait for at least RC, but if you guys decide that it's
>> >> >> neccessary
>> >> >> >> right now - why not?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Vladimir
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> 2011/9/11 Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> Hi Vladimir,
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Seems like we should get the branch merged back in to trunk soon.
>> Do
>> >> >> >>> you think it would be best to do that on the current 2.4M4, or
>> would
>> >> >> >>> it be wiser to wait until later?
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Ethan
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >> >> lester.mail@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> > As Vassil noted, the most important one is Textile update.
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> > Among other fixes I would also mention fix for dublicated
>> context
>> >> >> path
>> >> >> >>> > problem:
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1082-redirectresponse-duplicates-contextpath
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> > There were many reports and question on StackOverflow regarding
>> >> this
>> >> >> >>> issue.
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> > Vladimir
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> > 2011/9/10 Vassil Dichev <vd...@apache.org>
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> It should fix the long-standing ESME-307 (Textile and
>> >> punctuation)
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Richard Hirsch <
>> >> >> hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >>> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> > Thanks for the update.
>> >> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> > Are there any new features in the release that might be of
>> >> >> interest to
>> >> >> >>> >> ESME?
>> >> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> > D.
>> >> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >> >> >>> lester.mail@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >>> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> >> Below is an small update on current status for Lift 2.4
>> >> branch.
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> Lift-2.4M4 was announced yesterday:
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/f695772c254219b2
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> I've updated project files to new version, but it doesn't
>> >> compile
>> >> >> due
>> >> >> >>> to
>> >> >> >>> >> >> changes in Loc.Snippet class (it's neccessary to explicitly
>> >> >> specify _
>> >> >> >>> in
>> >> >> >>> >> >> order to compiler recognize that Snippet's parameter is a
>> >> >> function).
>> >> >> >>> See
>> >> >> >>> >> >> following link for more details:
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply()+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1
>> >> >> <
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply%28%29+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> I suppose this issue is easy to fix, but it will take some
>> >> time
>> >> >> for
>> >> >> >>> me
>> >> >> >>> >> due
>> >> >> >>> >> >> to extremly high workload (even on this weekend :s( ).
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> M4 will also make possible moving to 2.9.1 Scala version
>> >> (after
>> >> >> all
>> >> >> >>> >> >> dependencies are updated accordingly).
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> Vladimir
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> 2011/7/27 <in...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>> Going by the content of the discussion on this topic for
>> the
>> >> >> last
>> >> >> >>> >> couple of
>> >> >> >>> >> >>> days, it should be possible for Vladimir to implement the
>> >> >> >>> replacement,
>> >> >> >>> >> if
>> >> >> >>> >> >>> not just port the code from the old Ostrich code base.
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>> Hope he finds the time and the inclination!
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>> Imtiaz
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" <
>> >> >> >>> >> hirsch.dick@gmail.com
>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>> To: <de...@esme.apache.org>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8:33 PM
>> >> >> >>> >> >>> Subject: Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>  I think they (twitter) decided that the HTTP-based stats
>> was
>> >> >> enough
>> >> >> >>> or
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>> the JMX scala code conflicted with the new Scala version.
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >> >> >>> >> lester.mail@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Yes, I wasn't able to find any replacement too. I also
>> >> tried
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> >>> find
>> >> >> >>> >> any
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> forum or group to ask about this modification, but it
>> seems
>> >> >> >>> there's
>> >> >> >>> >> no
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> other
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> resources dedicated to this project besides GitHub.
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Next step is to find the reason of failed tests.
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>> OK - sounds good
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Vladimir
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> 2011/7/27 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>  Looked at the code last night and this morning. The JMX
>> >> >> support
>> >> >> >>> has
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> been totally removed.
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> I had a quick look and didn't find anything that might
>> be
>> >> a
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> replacement. In the meantime, we'll have to just use
>> the
>> >> >> >>> HTTP-based
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> interface.
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> D.
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >> >> >>> >> lester.mail@gmail.com
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Thank you, Dick!
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Here is the link to Ostrich's GitHub repo changeset
>> with
>> >> >> >>> >> StatsMBean >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> class
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > removed:
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> https://github.com/twitter/**ostrich/commit/**
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> 5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78**309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/**
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> twitter/ostrich<
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://github.com/twitter/ostrich/commit/5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/twitter/ostrich
>> >> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > May be it helps somehow.
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> OK - I'll take a look at it tonight
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov >>
>> <
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Yes, I had to comment it out.
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> Great.
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> Let me take a look for the StatsMBean
>> replacement.
>> >> Did
>> >> >> you
>> >> >> >>> >> comment
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> out
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> the usage of StatsMBean to get ESME to compile?
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> D.
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Vladimir Ivanov
>> <
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > Configgy is not used for configuration anymore
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - Package and method names were changed
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - There's no more StatsMBean class (and I have
>> no
>> >> >> idea
>> >> >> >>> >> whether
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > any
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > replacement is available).
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > --
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Best Regards,
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > --
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Best Regards,
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> --
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Best Regards,
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Vladimir Ivanov
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> --
>> >> >> >>> >> >> Best Regards,
>> >> >> >>> >> >> Vladimir Ivanov
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> > --
>> >> >> >>> > Best Regards,
>> >> >> >>> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> Best Regards,
>> >> >> >> Vladimir Ivanov
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Best Regards,
>> >> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Vladimir Ivanov
>

Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x

[Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>]

I guess yes if we decided to work with 2.4 version in it's current state.

Vladimir

2011/9/15 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>

> Should I deploy this version on our CloudBees instance?
>
> D.
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Lift 2.4 branch has been merged back into trunk.
> >
> > Please be aware about possible problems in CSS Selectors in 2.4 version:
> >
> > https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1110
> > https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1111
> > https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1114
> >
> > Vladimir
> >
> > 14 сентября 2011 г. 17:10 пользователь Ethan Jewett <esjewett@gmail.com
> >написал:
> >
> >> Sounds good!
> >>
> >> 2011/9/14 Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>:
> >> > Ok, if you guys don't mind I'll merge Lift 2.4 branch back into trunk
> >> > (hopefully this evening).
> >> >
> >> > Vladimir
> >> >
> >> > 2011/9/13 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> >> >
> >> >> I agree - work in the trunk - I assume that Lift 2.4 should be
> >> >> finished by the time we release 1.4.
> >> >>
> >> >> D
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> > Hi Vladimir and all,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Hmmm, I guess it depends on whether or not upgrading is required
> for
> >> >> > our 1.4 release. Personally, I think that because of the Textile
> fixes
> >> >> > (at least) we should shoot to include it, in which case we could
> merge
> >> >> > it back in without waiting. This would result in it getting more
> >> >> > testing from me, since I at least am developing on trunk and not
> the
> >> >> > Lift 2.4 branch.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thoughts?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Ethan
> >> >> >
> >> >> > 2011/9/13 Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>:
> >> >> >> Hi Ethan,
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Sorry for the late response.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I've fixed сompile-time errors and commited changes, but I think
> we
> >> need
> >> >> >> more time to test it. Moreover I had to remove some members from
> >> >> MsgParser
> >> >> >> class because they dublicated definitions in Textile's superclass
> (in
> >> >> its
> >> >> >> new version). Some of them were exactly the same, other were
> slightly
> >> >> >> different. So it would be ideal if Vassil find time to review it.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I would wait for at least RC, but if you guys decide that it's
> >> >> neccessary
> >> >> >> right now - why not?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Vladimir
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> 2011/9/11 Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> Hi Vladimir,
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Seems like we should get the branch merged back in to trunk soon.
> Do
> >> >> >>> you think it would be best to do that on the current 2.4M4, or
> would
> >> >> >>> it be wiser to wait until later?
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Ethan
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> >> >> lester.mail@gmail.com>
> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >> >>> > As Vassil noted, the most important one is Textile update.
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> > Among other fixes I would also mention fix for dublicated
> context
> >> >> path
> >> >> >>> > problem:
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1082-redirectresponse-duplicates-contextpath
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> > There were many reports and question on StackOverflow regarding
> >> this
> >> >> >>> issue.
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> > Vladimir
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> > 2011/9/10 Vassil Dichev <vd...@apache.org>
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> >> It should fix the long-standing ESME-307 (Textile and
> >> punctuation)
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Richard Hirsch <
> >> >> hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
> >> >> >>> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >> > Thanks for the update.
> >> >> >>> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> > Are there any new features in the release that might be of
> >> >> interest to
> >> >> >>> >> ESME?
> >> >> >>> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> > D.
> >> >> >>> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> >> >> >>> lester.mail@gmail.com>
> >> >> >>> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >> >> Below is an small update on current status for Lift 2.4
> >> branch.
> >> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >> >> Lift-2.4M4 was announced yesterday:
> >> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/f695772c254219b2
> >> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >> >> I've updated project files to new version, but it doesn't
> >> compile
> >> >> due
> >> >> >>> to
> >> >> >>> >> >> changes in Loc.Snippet class (it's neccessary to explicitly
> >> >> specify _
> >> >> >>> in
> >> >> >>> >> >> order to compiler recognize that Snippet's parameter is a
> >> >> function).
> >> >> >>> See
> >> >> >>> >> >> following link for more details:
> >> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply()+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1
> >> >> <
> >> >>
> >>
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply%28%29+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >> >> I suppose this issue is easy to fix, but it will take some
> >> time
> >> >> for
> >> >> >>> me
> >> >> >>> >> due
> >> >> >>> >> >> to extremly high workload (even on this weekend :s( ).
> >> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >> >> M4 will also make possible moving to 2.9.1 Scala version
> >> (after
> >> >> all
> >> >> >>> >> >> dependencies are updated accordingly).
> >> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >> >> Vladimir
> >> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >> >> 2011/7/27 <in...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >> >>> Going by the content of the discussion on this topic for
> the
> >> >> last
> >> >> >>> >> couple of
> >> >> >>> >> >>> days, it should be possible for Vladimir to implement the
> >> >> >>> replacement,
> >> >> >>> >> if
> >> >> >>> >> >>> not just port the code from the old Ostrich code base.
> >> >> >>> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> >> >>> Hope he finds the time and the inclination!
> >> >> >>> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> >> >>> Imtiaz
> >> >> >>> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" <
> >> >> >>> >> hirsch.dick@gmail.com
> >> >> >>> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> >> >>> To: <de...@esme.apache.org>
> >> >> >>> >> >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8:33 PM
> >> >> >>> >> >>> Subject: Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x
> >> >> >>> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>  I think they (twitter) decided that the HTTP-based stats
> was
> >> >> enough
> >> >> >>> or
> >> >> >>> >> >>>> the JMX scala code conflicted with the new Scala version.
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> >> >> >>> >> lester.mail@gmail.com>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Yes, I wasn't able to find any replacement too. I also
> >> tried
> >> >> to
> >> >> >>> find
> >> >> >>> >> any
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> forum or group to ask about this modification, but it
> seems
> >> >> >>> there's
> >> >> >>> >> no
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> other
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> resources dedicated to this project besides GitHub.
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Next step is to find the reason of failed tests.
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>> OK - sounds good
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Vladimir
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> 2011/7/27 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>  Looked at the code last night and this morning. The JMX
> >> >> support
> >> >> >>> has
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> been totally removed.
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> I had a quick look and didn't find anything that might
> be
> >> a
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> replacement. In the meantime, we'll have to just use
> the
> >> >> >>> HTTP-based
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> interface.
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> D.
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> >> >> >>> >> lester.mail@gmail.com
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Thank you, Dick!
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Here is the link to Ostrich's GitHub repo changeset
> with
> >> >> >>> >> StatsMBean >
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> class
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > removed:
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> https://github.com/twitter/**ostrich/commit/**
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> 5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78**309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/**
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> twitter/ostrich<
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/twitter/ostrich/commit/5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/twitter/ostrich
> >> >> >>> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > May be it helps somehow.
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> OK - I'll take a look at it tonight
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov >>
> <
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Yes, I had to comment it out.
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> Great.
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> Let me take a look for the StatsMBean
> replacement.
> >> Did
> >> >> you
> >> >> >>> >> comment
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> out
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> the usage of StatsMBean to get ESME to compile?
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> D.
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Vladimir Ivanov
> <
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > Configgy is not used for configuration anymore
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - Package and method names were changed
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - There's no more StatsMBean class (and I have
> no
> >> >> idea
> >> >> >>> >> whether
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > any
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > replacement is available).
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > --
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Best Regards,
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Vladimir Ivanov
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > --
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Best Regards,
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir Ivanov
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> --
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Best Regards,
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> Vladimir Ivanov
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >> >> --
> >> >> >>> >> >> Best Regards,
> >> >> >>> >> >> Vladimir Ivanov
> >> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >> >
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> > --
> >> >> >>> > Best Regards,
> >> >> >>> > Vladimir Ivanov
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> Best Regards,
> >> >> >> Vladimir Ivanov
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Best Regards,
> >> > Vladimir Ivanov
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> > Vladimir Ivanov
> >
>



-- 
Best Regards,
Vladimir Ivanov

Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x

[Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>]

Should I deploy this version on our CloudBees instance?

D.

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Lift 2.4 branch has been merged back into trunk.
>
> Please be aware about possible problems in CSS Selectors in 2.4 version:
>
> https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1110
> https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1111
> https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1114
>
> Vladimir
>
> 14 сентября 2011 г. 17:10 пользователь Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>написал:
>
>> Sounds good!
>>
>> 2011/9/14 Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>:
>> > Ok, if you guys don't mind I'll merge Lift 2.4 branch back into trunk
>> > (hopefully this evening).
>> >
>> > Vladimir
>> >
>> > 2011/9/13 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> >
>> >> I agree - work in the trunk - I assume that Lift 2.4 should be
>> >> finished by the time we release 1.4.
>> >>
>> >> D
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> > Hi Vladimir and all,
>> >> >
>> >> > Hmmm, I guess it depends on whether or not upgrading is required for
>> >> > our 1.4 release. Personally, I think that because of the Textile fixes
>> >> > (at least) we should shoot to include it, in which case we could merge
>> >> > it back in without waiting. This would result in it getting more
>> >> > testing from me, since I at least am developing on trunk and not the
>> >> > Lift 2.4 branch.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thoughts?
>> >> >
>> >> > Ethan
>> >> >
>> >> > 2011/9/13 Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>:
>> >> >> Hi Ethan,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Sorry for the late response.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I've fixed сompile-time errors and commited changes, but I think we
>> need
>> >> >> more time to test it. Moreover I had to remove some members from
>> >> MsgParser
>> >> >> class because they dublicated definitions in Textile's superclass (in
>> >> its
>> >> >> new version). Some of them were exactly the same, other were slightly
>> >> >> different. So it would be ideal if Vassil find time to review it.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I would wait for at least RC, but if you guys decide that it's
>> >> neccessary
>> >> >> right now - why not?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Vladimir
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2011/9/11 Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> Hi Vladimir,
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Seems like we should get the branch merged back in to trunk soon. Do
>> >> >>> you think it would be best to do that on the current 2.4M4, or would
>> >> >>> it be wiser to wait until later?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Ethan
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >> lester.mail@gmail.com>
>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>> > As Vassil noted, the most important one is Textile update.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > Among other fixes I would also mention fix for dublicated context
>> >> path
>> >> >>> > problem:
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>> http://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1082-redirectresponse-duplicates-contextpath
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > There were many reports and question on StackOverflow regarding
>> this
>> >> >>> issue.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > Vladimir
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > 2011/9/10 Vassil Dichev <vd...@apache.org>
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> It should fix the long-standing ESME-307 (Textile and
>> punctuation)
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Richard Hirsch <
>> >> hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> > Thanks for the update.
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > Are there any new features in the release that might be of
>> >> interest to
>> >> >>> >> ESME?
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > D.
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >> >>> lester.mail@gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >> Below is an small update on current status for Lift 2.4
>> branch.
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> Lift-2.4M4 was announced yesterday:
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/f695772c254219b2
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> I've updated project files to new version, but it doesn't
>> compile
>> >> due
>> >> >>> to
>> >> >>> >> >> changes in Loc.Snippet class (it's neccessary to explicitly
>> >> specify _
>> >> >>> in
>> >> >>> >> >> order to compiler recognize that Snippet's parameter is a
>> >> function).
>> >> >>> See
>> >> >>> >> >> following link for more details:
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply()+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1
>> >> <
>> >>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply%28%29+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1
>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> I suppose this issue is easy to fix, but it will take some
>> time
>> >> for
>> >> >>> me
>> >> >>> >> due
>> >> >>> >> >> to extremly high workload (even on this weekend :s( ).
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> M4 will also make possible moving to 2.9.1 Scala version
>> (after
>> >> all
>> >> >>> >> >> dependencies are updated accordingly).
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> Vladimir
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> 2011/7/27 <in...@gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>> Going by the content of the discussion on this topic for the
>> >> last
>> >> >>> >> couple of
>> >> >>> >> >>> days, it should be possible for Vladimir to implement the
>> >> >>> replacement,
>> >> >>> >> if
>> >> >>> >> >>> not just port the code from the old Ostrich code base.
>> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> Hope he finds the time and the inclination!
>> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> Imtiaz
>> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" <
>> >> >>> >> hirsch.dick@gmail.com
>> >> >>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>> To: <de...@esme.apache.org>
>> >> >>> >> >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8:33 PM
>> >> >>> >> >>> Subject: Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x
>> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>  I think they (twitter) decided that the HTTP-based stats was
>> >> enough
>> >> >>> or
>> >> >>> >> >>>> the JMX scala code conflicted with the new Scala version.
>> >> >>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >> >>> >> lester.mail@gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> >>>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>> Yes, I wasn't able to find any replacement too. I also
>> tried
>> >> to
>> >> >>> find
>> >> >>> >> any
>> >> >>> >> >>>>> forum or group to ask about this modification, but it seems
>> >> >>> there's
>> >> >>> >> no
>> >> >>> >> >>>>> other
>> >> >>> >> >>>>> resources dedicated to this project besides GitHub.
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>> Next step is to find the reason of failed tests.
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>> OK - sounds good
>> >> >>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>> Vladimir
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>> 2011/7/27 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>  Looked at the code last night and this morning. The JMX
>> >> support
>> >> >>> has
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> been totally removed.
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> I had a quick look and didn't find anything that might be
>> a
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> replacement. In the meantime, we'll have to just use the
>> >> >>> HTTP-based
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> interface.
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> D.
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >> >>> >> lester.mail@gmail.com
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Thank you, Dick!
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Here is the link to Ostrich's GitHub repo changeset with
>> >> >>> >> StatsMBean >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> class
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > removed:
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> https://github.com/twitter/**ostrich/commit/**
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> 5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78**309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/**
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> twitter/ostrich<
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>> https://github.com/twitter/ostrich/commit/5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/twitter/ostrich
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > May be it helps somehow.
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> OK - I'll take a look at it tonight
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov >> <
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Yes, I had to comment it out.
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> Great.
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> Let me take a look for the StatsMBean replacement.
>> Did
>> >> you
>> >> >>> >> comment
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> out
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> the usage of StatsMBean to get ESME to compile?
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> D.
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > Configgy is not used for configuration anymore
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - Package and method names were changed
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - There's no more StatsMBean class (and I have no
>> >> idea
>> >> >>> >> whether
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > any
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > replacement is available).
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > --
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Best Regards,
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > --
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Best Regards,
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>> --
>> >> >>> >> >>>>> Best Regards,
>> >> >>> >> >>>>> Vladimir Ivanov
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >> --
>> >> >>> >> >> Best Regards,
>> >> >>> >> >> Vladimir Ivanov
>> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > --
>> >> >>> > Best Regards,
>> >> >>> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Best Regards,
>> >> >> Vladimir Ivanov
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Vladimir Ivanov
>

Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x

[Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>]

Hi all,

Lift 2.4 branch has been merged back into trunk.

Please be aware about possible problems in CSS Selectors in 2.4 version:

https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1110
https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1111
https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1114

Vladimir

14 сентября 2011 г. 17:10 пользователь Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>написал:

> Sounds good!
>
> 2011/9/14 Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>:
> > Ok, if you guys don't mind I'll merge Lift 2.4 branch back into trunk
> > (hopefully this evening).
> >
> > Vladimir
> >
> > 2011/9/13 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> >
> >> I agree - work in the trunk - I assume that Lift 2.4 should be
> >> finished by the time we release 1.4.
> >>
> >> D
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > Hi Vladimir and all,
> >> >
> >> > Hmmm, I guess it depends on whether or not upgrading is required for
> >> > our 1.4 release. Personally, I think that because of the Textile fixes
> >> > (at least) we should shoot to include it, in which case we could merge
> >> > it back in without waiting. This would result in it getting more
> >> > testing from me, since I at least am developing on trunk and not the
> >> > Lift 2.4 branch.
> >> >
> >> > Thoughts?
> >> >
> >> > Ethan
> >> >
> >> > 2011/9/13 Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>:
> >> >> Hi Ethan,
> >> >>
> >> >> Sorry for the late response.
> >> >>
> >> >> I've fixed сompile-time errors and commited changes, but I think we
> need
> >> >> more time to test it. Moreover I had to remove some members from
> >> MsgParser
> >> >> class because they dublicated definitions in Textile's superclass (in
> >> its
> >> >> new version). Some of them were exactly the same, other were slightly
> >> >> different. So it would be ideal if Vassil find time to review it.
> >> >>
> >> >> I would wait for at least RC, but if you guys decide that it's
> >> neccessary
> >> >> right now - why not?
> >> >>
> >> >> Vladimir
> >> >>
> >> >> 2011/9/11 Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>
> >> >>
> >> >>> Hi Vladimir,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Seems like we should get the branch merged back in to trunk soon. Do
> >> >>> you think it would be best to do that on the current 2.4M4, or would
> >> >>> it be wiser to wait until later?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Ethan
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> >> lester.mail@gmail.com>
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>> > As Vassil noted, the most important one is Textile update.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Among other fixes I would also mention fix for dublicated context
> >> path
> >> >>> > problem:
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >>
> http://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1082-redirectresponse-duplicates-contextpath
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > There were many reports and question on StackOverflow regarding
> this
> >> >>> issue.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Vladimir
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > 2011/9/10 Vassil Dichev <vd...@apache.org>
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >> It should fix the long-standing ESME-307 (Textile and
> punctuation)
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Richard Hirsch <
> >> hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
> >> >>> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >> > Thanks for the update.
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > Are there any new features in the release that might be of
> >> interest to
> >> >>> >> ESME?
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > D.
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> >> >>> lester.mail@gmail.com>
> >> >>> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >> Below is an small update on current status for Lift 2.4
> branch.
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> Lift-2.4M4 was announced yesterday:
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>>
> >>
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/f695772c254219b2
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> I've updated project files to new version, but it doesn't
> compile
> >> due
> >> >>> to
> >> >>> >> >> changes in Loc.Snippet class (it's neccessary to explicitly
> >> specify _
> >> >>> in
> >> >>> >> >> order to compiler recognize that Snippet's parameter is a
> >> function).
> >> >>> See
> >> >>> >> >> following link for more details:
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>>
> >>
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply()+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1
> >> <
> >>
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply%28%29+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1
> >> >
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> I suppose this issue is easy to fix, but it will take some
> time
> >> for
> >> >>> me
> >> >>> >> due
> >> >>> >> >> to extremly high workload (even on this weekend :s( ).
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> M4 will also make possible moving to 2.9.1 Scala version
> (after
> >> all
> >> >>> >> >> dependencies are updated accordingly).
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> Vladimir
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> 2011/7/27 <in...@gmail.com>
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>> Going by the content of the discussion on this topic for the
> >> last
> >> >>> >> couple of
> >> >>> >> >>> days, it should be possible for Vladimir to implement the
> >> >>> replacement,
> >> >>> >> if
> >> >>> >> >>> not just port the code from the old Ostrich code base.
> >> >>> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> >>> Hope he finds the time and the inclination!
> >> >>> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> >>> Imtiaz
> >> >>> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" <
> >> >>> >> hirsch.dick@gmail.com
> >> >>> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >> >>> To: <de...@esme.apache.org>
> >> >>> >> >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8:33 PM
> >> >>> >> >>> Subject: Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x
> >> >>> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> >>>  I think they (twitter) decided that the HTTP-based stats was
> >> enough
> >> >>> or
> >> >>> >> >>>> the JMX scala code conflicted with the new Scala version.
> >> >>> >> >>>>
> >> >>> >> >>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> >> >>> >> lester.mail@gmail.com>
> >> >>> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>>>
> >> >>> >> >>>>> Yes, I wasn't able to find any replacement too. I also
> tried
> >> to
> >> >>> find
> >> >>> >> any
> >> >>> >> >>>>> forum or group to ask about this modification, but it seems
> >> >>> there's
> >> >>> >> no
> >> >>> >> >>>>> other
> >> >>> >> >>>>> resources dedicated to this project besides GitHub.
> >> >>> >> >>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>>>> Next step is to find the reason of failed tests.
> >> >>> >> >>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>>>
> >> >>> >> >>>> OK - sounds good
> >> >>> >> >>>>
> >> >>> >> >>>>
> >> >>> >> >>>>> Vladimir
> >> >>> >> >>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>>>> 2011/7/27 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> >> >>> >> >>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>>>>  Looked at the code last night and this morning. The JMX
> >> support
> >> >>> has
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> been totally removed.
> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> I had a quick look and didn't find anything that might be
> a
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> replacement. In the meantime, we'll have to just use the
> >> >>> HTTP-based
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> interface.
> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> D.
> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> >> >>> >> lester.mail@gmail.com
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Thank you, Dick!
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Here is the link to Ostrich's GitHub repo changeset with
> >> >>> >> StatsMBean >
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> class
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > removed:
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> https://github.com/twitter/**ostrich/commit/**
> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >> 5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78**309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/**
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> twitter/ostrich<
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>>
> >>
> https://github.com/twitter/ostrich/commit/5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/twitter/ostrich
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > May be it helps somehow.
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> OK - I'll take a look at it tonight
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >>
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov >> <
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Yes, I had to comment it out.
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> Great.
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> Let me take a look for the StatsMBean replacement.
> Did
> >> you
> >> >>> >> comment
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> out
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> the usage of StatsMBean to get ESME to compile?
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> D.
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > Configgy is not used for configuration anymore
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - Package and method names were changed
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - There's no more StatsMBean class (and I have no
> >> idea
> >> >>> >> whether
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > any
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > replacement is available).
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > --
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Best Regards,
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Vladimir Ivanov
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >>
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > --
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Best Regards,
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir Ivanov
> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>>>> --
> >> >>> >> >>>>> Best Regards,
> >> >>> >> >>>>> Vladimir Ivanov
> >> >>> >> >>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>>>>
> >> >>> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> --
> >> >>> >> >> Best Regards,
> >> >>> >> >> Vladimir Ivanov
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > --
> >> >>> > Best Regards,
> >> >>> > Vladimir Ivanov
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Best Regards,
> >> >> Vladimir Ivanov
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> > Vladimir Ivanov
> >
>



-- 
Best Regards,
Vladimir Ivanov

Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x

[Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>]

Sounds good!

2011/9/14 Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>:
> Ok, if you guys don't mind I'll merge Lift 2.4 branch back into trunk
> (hopefully this evening).
>
> Vladimir
>
> 2011/9/13 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>
>> I agree - work in the trunk - I assume that Lift 2.4 should be
>> finished by the time we release 1.4.
>>
>> D
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Vladimir and all,
>> >
>> > Hmmm, I guess it depends on whether or not upgrading is required for
>> > our 1.4 release. Personally, I think that because of the Textile fixes
>> > (at least) we should shoot to include it, in which case we could merge
>> > it back in without waiting. This would result in it getting more
>> > testing from me, since I at least am developing on trunk and not the
>> > Lift 2.4 branch.
>> >
>> > Thoughts?
>> >
>> > Ethan
>> >
>> > 2011/9/13 Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>:
>> >> Hi Ethan,
>> >>
>> >> Sorry for the late response.
>> >>
>> >> I've fixed сompile-time errors and commited changes, but I think we need
>> >> more time to test it. Moreover I had to remove some members from
>> MsgParser
>> >> class because they dublicated definitions in Textile's superclass (in
>> its
>> >> new version). Some of them were exactly the same, other were slightly
>> >> different. So it would be ideal if Vassil find time to review it.
>> >>
>> >> I would wait for at least RC, but if you guys decide that it's
>> neccessary
>> >> right now - why not?
>> >>
>> >> Vladimir
>> >>
>> >> 2011/9/11 Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >>> Hi Vladimir,
>> >>>
>> >>> Seems like we should get the branch merged back in to trunk soon. Do
>> >>> you think it would be best to do that on the current 2.4M4, or would
>> >>> it be wiser to wait until later?
>> >>>
>> >>> Ethan
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> lester.mail@gmail.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> > As Vassil noted, the most important one is Textile update.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Among other fixes I would also mention fix for dublicated context
>> path
>> >>> > problem:
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> http://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1082-redirectresponse-duplicates-contextpath
>> >>> >
>> >>> > There were many reports and question on StackOverflow regarding this
>> >>> issue.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Vladimir
>> >>> >
>> >>> > 2011/9/10 Vassil Dichev <vd...@apache.org>
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> It should fix the long-standing ESME-307 (Textile and punctuation)
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Richard Hirsch <
>> hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> wrote:
>> >>> >> > Thanks for the update.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > Are there any new features in the release that might be of
>> interest to
>> >>> >> ESME?
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > D.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >>> lester.mail@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> wrote:
>> >>> >> >> Below is an small update on current status for Lift 2.4 branch.
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> Lift-2.4M4 was announced yesterday:
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/f695772c254219b2
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> I've updated project files to new version, but it doesn't compile
>> due
>> >>> to
>> >>> >> >> changes in Loc.Snippet class (it's neccessary to explicitly
>> specify _
>> >>> in
>> >>> >> >> order to compiler recognize that Snippet's parameter is a
>> function).
>> >>> See
>> >>> >> >> following link for more details:
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply()+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1
>> <
>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply%28%29+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1
>> >
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> I suppose this issue is easy to fix, but it will take some time
>> for
>> >>> me
>> >>> >> due
>> >>> >> >> to extremly high workload (even on this weekend :s( ).
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> M4 will also make possible moving to 2.9.1 Scala version (after
>> all
>> >>> >> >> dependencies are updated accordingly).
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> Vladimir
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> 2011/7/27 <in...@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>> Going by the content of the discussion on this topic for the
>> last
>> >>> >> couple of
>> >>> >> >>> days, it should be possible for Vladimir to implement the
>> >>> replacement,
>> >>> >> if
>> >>> >> >>> not just port the code from the old Ostrich code base.
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> Hope he finds the time and the inclination!
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> Imtiaz
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" <
>> >>> >> hirsch.dick@gmail.com
>> >>> >> >>> >
>> >>> >> >>> To: <de...@esme.apache.org>
>> >>> >> >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8:33 PM
>> >>> >> >>> Subject: Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>>  I think they (twitter) decided that the HTTP-based stats was
>> enough
>> >>> or
>> >>> >> >>>> the JMX scala code conflicted with the new Scala version.
>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >>> >> lester.mail@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>>> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>> Yes, I wasn't able to find any replacement too. I also tried
>> to
>> >>> find
>> >>> >> any
>> >>> >> >>>>> forum or group to ask about this modification, but it seems
>> >>> there's
>> >>> >> no
>> >>> >> >>>>> other
>> >>> >> >>>>> resources dedicated to this project besides GitHub.
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>> Next step is to find the reason of failed tests.
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>>> OK - sounds good
>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>> Vladimir
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>> 2011/7/27 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>  Looked at the code last night and this morning. The JMX
>> support
>> >>> has
>> >>> >> >>>>>> been totally removed.
>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> I had a quick look and didn't find anything that might be a
>> >>> >> >>>>>> replacement. In the meantime, we'll have to just use the
>> >>> HTTP-based
>> >>> >> >>>>>> interface.
>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> D.
>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >>> >> lester.mail@gmail.com
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>>>>> > Thank you, Dick!
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> > Here is the link to Ostrich's GitHub repo changeset with
>> >>> >> StatsMBean >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> class
>> >>> >> >>>>>> > removed:
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> https://github.com/twitter/**ostrich/commit/**
>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> 5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78**309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/**
>> >>> >> >>>>>> twitter/ostrich<
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> https://github.com/twitter/ostrich/commit/5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/twitter/ostrich
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> > May be it helps somehow.
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> OK - I'll take a look at it tonight
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov >> <
>> >>> >> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Yes, I had to comment it out.
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> Great.
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> Let me take a look for the StatsMBean replacement. Did
>> you
>> >>> >> comment
>> >>> >> >>>>>> out
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> the usage of StatsMBean to get ESME to compile?
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> D.
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >>> >> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > Configgy is not used for configuration anymore
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - Package and method names were changed
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - There's no more StatsMBean class (and I have no
>> idea
>> >>> >> whether
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > any
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > replacement is available).
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > --
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Best Regards,
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> > --
>> >>> >> >>>>>> > Best Regards,
>> >>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>> --
>> >>> >> >>>>> Best Regards,
>> >>> >> >>>>> Vladimir Ivanov
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> --
>> >>> >> >> Best Regards,
>> >>> >> >> Vladimir Ivanov
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > --
>> >>> > Best Regards,
>> >>> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Best Regards,
>> >> Vladimir Ivanov
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Vladimir Ivanov
>

Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x

[Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>]

Thanks

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, if you guys don't mind I'll merge Lift 2.4 branch back into trunk
> (hopefully this evening).
>
> Vladimir
>
> 2011/9/13 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>
>> I agree - work in the trunk - I assume that Lift 2.4 should be
>> finished by the time we release 1.4.
>>
>> D
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Vladimir and all,
>> >
>> > Hmmm, I guess it depends on whether or not upgrading is required for
>> > our 1.4 release. Personally, I think that because of the Textile fixes
>> > (at least) we should shoot to include it, in which case we could merge
>> > it back in without waiting. This would result in it getting more
>> > testing from me, since I at least am developing on trunk and not the
>> > Lift 2.4 branch.
>> >
>> > Thoughts?
>> >
>> > Ethan
>> >
>> > 2011/9/13 Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>:
>> >> Hi Ethan,
>> >>
>> >> Sorry for the late response.
>> >>
>> >> I've fixed сompile-time errors and commited changes, but I think we need
>> >> more time to test it. Moreover I had to remove some members from
>> MsgParser
>> >> class because they dublicated definitions in Textile's superclass (in
>> its
>> >> new version). Some of them were exactly the same, other were slightly
>> >> different. So it would be ideal if Vassil find time to review it.
>> >>
>> >> I would wait for at least RC, but if you guys decide that it's
>> neccessary
>> >> right now - why not?
>> >>
>> >> Vladimir
>> >>
>> >> 2011/9/11 Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >>> Hi Vladimir,
>> >>>
>> >>> Seems like we should get the branch merged back in to trunk soon. Do
>> >>> you think it would be best to do that on the current 2.4M4, or would
>> >>> it be wiser to wait until later?
>> >>>
>> >>> Ethan
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> lester.mail@gmail.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> > As Vassil noted, the most important one is Textile update.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Among other fixes I would also mention fix for dublicated context
>> path
>> >>> > problem:
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> http://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1082-redirectresponse-duplicates-contextpath
>> >>> >
>> >>> > There were many reports and question on StackOverflow regarding this
>> >>> issue.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Vladimir
>> >>> >
>> >>> > 2011/9/10 Vassil Dichev <vd...@apache.org>
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> It should fix the long-standing ESME-307 (Textile and punctuation)
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Richard Hirsch <
>> hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> wrote:
>> >>> >> > Thanks for the update.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > Are there any new features in the release that might be of
>> interest to
>> >>> >> ESME?
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > D.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >>> lester.mail@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> wrote:
>> >>> >> >> Below is an small update on current status for Lift 2.4 branch.
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> Lift-2.4M4 was announced yesterday:
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/f695772c254219b2
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> I've updated project files to new version, but it doesn't compile
>> due
>> >>> to
>> >>> >> >> changes in Loc.Snippet class (it's neccessary to explicitly
>> specify _
>> >>> in
>> >>> >> >> order to compiler recognize that Snippet's parameter is a
>> function).
>> >>> See
>> >>> >> >> following link for more details:
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply()+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1
>> <
>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply%28%29+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1
>> >
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> I suppose this issue is easy to fix, but it will take some time
>> for
>> >>> me
>> >>> >> due
>> >>> >> >> to extremly high workload (even on this weekend :s( ).
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> M4 will also make possible moving to 2.9.1 Scala version (after
>> all
>> >>> >> >> dependencies are updated accordingly).
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> Vladimir
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> 2011/7/27 <in...@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>> Going by the content of the discussion on this topic for the
>> last
>> >>> >> couple of
>> >>> >> >>> days, it should be possible for Vladimir to implement the
>> >>> replacement,
>> >>> >> if
>> >>> >> >>> not just port the code from the old Ostrich code base.
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> Hope he finds the time and the inclination!
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> Imtiaz
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" <
>> >>> >> hirsch.dick@gmail.com
>> >>> >> >>> >
>> >>> >> >>> To: <de...@esme.apache.org>
>> >>> >> >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8:33 PM
>> >>> >> >>> Subject: Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>>  I think they (twitter) decided that the HTTP-based stats was
>> enough
>> >>> or
>> >>> >> >>>> the JMX scala code conflicted with the new Scala version.
>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >>> >> lester.mail@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>>> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>> Yes, I wasn't able to find any replacement too. I also tried
>> to
>> >>> find
>> >>> >> any
>> >>> >> >>>>> forum or group to ask about this modification, but it seems
>> >>> there's
>> >>> >> no
>> >>> >> >>>>> other
>> >>> >> >>>>> resources dedicated to this project besides GitHub.
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>> Next step is to find the reason of failed tests.
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>>> OK - sounds good
>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>> Vladimir
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>> 2011/7/27 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>  Looked at the code last night and this morning. The JMX
>> support
>> >>> has
>> >>> >> >>>>>> been totally removed.
>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> I had a quick look and didn't find anything that might be a
>> >>> >> >>>>>> replacement. In the meantime, we'll have to just use the
>> >>> HTTP-based
>> >>> >> >>>>>> interface.
>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> D.
>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >>> >> lester.mail@gmail.com
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>>>>> > Thank you, Dick!
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> > Here is the link to Ostrich's GitHub repo changeset with
>> >>> >> StatsMBean >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> class
>> >>> >> >>>>>> > removed:
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> https://github.com/twitter/**ostrich/commit/**
>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> 5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78**309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/**
>> >>> >> >>>>>> twitter/ostrich<
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> https://github.com/twitter/ostrich/commit/5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/twitter/ostrich
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> > May be it helps somehow.
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> OK - I'll take a look at it tonight
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov >> <
>> >>> >> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Yes, I had to comment it out.
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> Great.
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> Let me take a look for the StatsMBean replacement. Did
>> you
>> >>> >> comment
>> >>> >> >>>>>> out
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> the usage of StatsMBean to get ESME to compile?
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> D.
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >>> >> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > Configgy is not used for configuration anymore
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - Package and method names were changed
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - There's no more StatsMBean class (and I have no
>> idea
>> >>> >> whether
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > any
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > replacement is available).
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > --
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Best Regards,
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >>
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>> > --
>> >>> >> >>>>>> > Best Regards,
>> >>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>> --
>> >>> >> >>>>> Best Regards,
>> >>> >> >>>>> Vladimir Ivanov
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>>>
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> --
>> >>> >> >> Best Regards,
>> >>> >> >> Vladimir Ivanov
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > --
>> >>> > Best Regards,
>> >>> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Best Regards,
>> >> Vladimir Ivanov
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Vladimir Ivanov
>

Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x

[Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>]

Ok, if you guys don't mind I'll merge Lift 2.4 branch back into trunk
(hopefully this evening).

Vladimir

2011/9/13 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>

> I agree - work in the trunk - I assume that Lift 2.4 should be
> finished by the time we release 1.4.
>
> D
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Vladimir and all,
> >
> > Hmmm, I guess it depends on whether or not upgrading is required for
> > our 1.4 release. Personally, I think that because of the Textile fixes
> > (at least) we should shoot to include it, in which case we could merge
> > it back in without waiting. This would result in it getting more
> > testing from me, since I at least am developing on trunk and not the
> > Lift 2.4 branch.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Ethan
> >
> > 2011/9/13 Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>:
> >> Hi Ethan,
> >>
> >> Sorry for the late response.
> >>
> >> I've fixed сompile-time errors and commited changes, but I think we need
> >> more time to test it. Moreover I had to remove some members from
> MsgParser
> >> class because they dublicated definitions in Textile's superclass (in
> its
> >> new version). Some of them were exactly the same, other were slightly
> >> different. So it would be ideal if Vassil find time to review it.
> >>
> >> I would wait for at least RC, but if you guys decide that it's
> neccessary
> >> right now - why not?
> >>
> >> Vladimir
> >>
> >> 2011/9/11 Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>
> >>
> >>> Hi Vladimir,
> >>>
> >>> Seems like we should get the branch merged back in to trunk soon. Do
> >>> you think it would be best to do that on the current 2.4M4, or would
> >>> it be wiser to wait until later?
> >>>
> >>> Ethan
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> lester.mail@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > As Vassil noted, the most important one is Textile update.
> >>> >
> >>> > Among other fixes I would also mention fix for dublicated context
> path
> >>> > problem:
> >>> >
> >>>
> http://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1082-redirectresponse-duplicates-contextpath
> >>> >
> >>> > There were many reports and question on StackOverflow regarding this
> >>> issue.
> >>> >
> >>> > Vladimir
> >>> >
> >>> > 2011/9/10 Vassil Dichev <vd...@apache.org>
> >>> >
> >>> >> It should fix the long-standing ESME-307 (Textile and punctuation)
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Richard Hirsch <
> hirsch.dick@gmail.com>
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >> > Thanks for the update.
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > Are there any new features in the release that might be of
> interest to
> >>> >> ESME?
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > D.
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> >>> lester.mail@gmail.com>
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >> Below is an small update on current status for Lift 2.4 branch.
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> Lift-2.4M4 was announced yesterday:
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/f695772c254219b2
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> I've updated project files to new version, but it doesn't compile
> due
> >>> to
> >>> >> >> changes in Loc.Snippet class (it's neccessary to explicitly
> specify _
> >>> in
> >>> >> >> order to compiler recognize that Snippet's parameter is a
> function).
> >>> See
> >>> >> >> following link for more details:
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply()+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1
> <
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply%28%29+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1
> >
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> I suppose this issue is easy to fix, but it will take some time
> for
> >>> me
> >>> >> due
> >>> >> >> to extremly high workload (even on this weekend :s( ).
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> M4 will also make possible moving to 2.9.1 Scala version (after
> all
> >>> >> >> dependencies are updated accordingly).
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> Vladimir
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> 2011/7/27 <in...@gmail.com>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>> Going by the content of the discussion on this topic for the
> last
> >>> >> couple of
> >>> >> >>> days, it should be possible for Vladimir to implement the
> >>> replacement,
> >>> >> if
> >>> >> >>> not just port the code from the old Ostrich code base.
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>> Hope he finds the time and the inclination!
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>> Imtiaz
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" <
> >>> >> hirsch.dick@gmail.com
> >>> >> >>> >
> >>> >> >>> To: <de...@esme.apache.org>
> >>> >> >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8:33 PM
> >>> >> >>> Subject: Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>>  I think they (twitter) decided that the HTTP-based stats was
> enough
> >>> or
> >>> >> >>>> the JMX scala code conflicted with the new Scala version.
> >>> >> >>>>
> >>> >> >>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> >>> >> lester.mail@gmail.com>
> >>> >> >>>> wrote:
> >>> >> >>>>
> >>> >> >>>>> Yes, I wasn't able to find any replacement too. I also tried
> to
> >>> find
> >>> >> any
> >>> >> >>>>> forum or group to ask about this modification, but it seems
> >>> there's
> >>> >> no
> >>> >> >>>>> other
> >>> >> >>>>> resources dedicated to this project besides GitHub.
> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>> Next step is to find the reason of failed tests.
> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>
> >>> >> >>>> OK - sounds good
> >>> >> >>>>
> >>> >> >>>>
> >>> >> >>>>> Vladimir
> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>> 2011/7/27 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>>  Looked at the code last night and this morning. The JMX
> support
> >>> has
> >>> >> >>>>>> been totally removed.
> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>>> I had a quick look and didn't find anything that might be a
> >>> >> >>>>>> replacement. In the meantime, we'll have to just use the
> >>> HTTP-based
> >>> >> >>>>>> interface.
> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>>> D.
> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> >>> >> lester.mail@gmail.com
> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >>> >> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>> >> >>>>>> > Thank you, Dick!
> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >>> >> >>>>>> > Here is the link to Ostrich's GitHub repo changeset with
> >>> >> StatsMBean >
> >>> >> >>>>>> class
> >>> >> >>>>>> > removed:
> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >>> >> >>>>>> https://github.com/twitter/**ostrich/commit/**
> >>> >> >>>>>>
> 5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78**309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/**
> >>> >> >>>>>> twitter/ostrich<
> >>> >>
> >>>
> https://github.com/twitter/ostrich/commit/5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/twitter/ostrich
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >>> >> >>>>>> > May be it helps somehow.
> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir
> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >>> >> >>>>>> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >>> >> >>>>>> >> OK - I'll take a look at it tonight
> >>> >> >>>>>> >>
> >>> >> >>>>>> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov >> <
> >>> >> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >>> >> >>>>>> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Yes, I had to comment it out.
> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> Great.
> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> Let me take a look for the StatsMBean replacement. Did
> you
> >>> >> comment
> >>> >> >>>>>> out
> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> the usage of StatsMBean to get ESME to compile?
> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> D.
> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> >>> >> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > Configgy is not used for configuration anymore
> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - Package and method names were changed
> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - There's no more StatsMBean class (and I have no
> idea
> >>> >> whether
> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > any
> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > replacement is available).
> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > --
> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Best Regards,
> >>> >> >>>>>> >> > Vladimir Ivanov
> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >>> >> >>>>>> >>
> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >>> >> >>>>>> > --
> >>> >> >>>>>> > Best Regards,
> >>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir Ivanov
> >>> >> >>>>>> >
> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>> --
> >>> >> >>>>> Best Regards,
> >>> >> >>>>> Vladimir Ivanov
> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>> >> >>>>>
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> --
> >>> >> >> Best Regards,
> >>> >> >> Vladimir Ivanov
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > Best Regards,
> >>> > Vladimir Ivanov
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Vladimir Ivanov
> >>
> >
>



-- 
Best Regards,
Vladimir Ivanov

Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x

[Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>]

I agree - work in the trunk - I assume that Lift 2.4 should be
finished by the time we release 1.4.

D


On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Vladimir and all,
>
> Hmmm, I guess it depends on whether or not upgrading is required for
> our 1.4 release. Personally, I think that because of the Textile fixes
> (at least) we should shoot to include it, in which case we could merge
> it back in without waiting. This would result in it getting more
> testing from me, since I at least am developing on trunk and not the
> Lift 2.4 branch.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Ethan
>
> 2011/9/13 Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>:
>> Hi Ethan,
>>
>> Sorry for the late response.
>>
>> I've fixed сompile-time errors and commited changes, but I think we need
>> more time to test it. Moreover I had to remove some members from MsgParser
>> class because they dublicated definitions in Textile's superclass (in its
>> new version). Some of them were exactly the same, other were slightly
>> different. So it would be ideal if Vassil find time to review it.
>>
>> I would wait for at least RC, but if you guys decide that it's neccessary
>> right now - why not?
>>
>> Vladimir
>>
>> 2011/9/11 Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>
>>
>>> Hi Vladimir,
>>>
>>> Seems like we should get the branch merged back in to trunk soon. Do
>>> you think it would be best to do that on the current 2.4M4, or would
>>> it be wiser to wait until later?
>>>
>>> Ethan
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > As Vassil noted, the most important one is Textile update.
>>> >
>>> > Among other fixes I would also mention fix for dublicated context path
>>> > problem:
>>> >
>>> http://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1082-redirectresponse-duplicates-contextpath
>>> >
>>> > There were many reports and question on StackOverflow regarding this
>>> issue.
>>> >
>>> > Vladimir
>>> >
>>> > 2011/9/10 Vassil Dichev <vd...@apache.org>
>>> >
>>> >> It should fix the long-standing ESME-307 (Textile and punctuation)
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> > Thanks for the update.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Are there any new features in the release that might be of interest to
>>> >> ESME?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > D.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>>> lester.mail@gmail.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> >> Below is an small update on current status for Lift 2.4 branch.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Lift-2.4M4 was announced yesterday:
>>> >> >>
>>> >>
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/f695772c254219b2
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> I've updated project files to new version, but it doesn't compile due
>>> to
>>> >> >> changes in Loc.Snippet class (it's neccessary to explicitly specify _
>>> in
>>> >> >> order to compiler recognize that Snippet's parameter is a function).
>>> See
>>> >> >> following link for more details:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >>
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply()+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1<http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply%28%29+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> I suppose this issue is easy to fix, but it will take some time for
>>> me
>>> >> due
>>> >> >> to extremly high workload (even on this weekend :s( ).
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> M4 will also make possible moving to 2.9.1 Scala version (after all
>>> >> >> dependencies are updated accordingly).
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Vladimir
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> 2011/7/27 <in...@gmail.com>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>> Going by the content of the discussion on this topic for the last
>>> >> couple of
>>> >> >>> days, it should be possible for Vladimir to implement the
>>> replacement,
>>> >> if
>>> >> >>> not just port the code from the old Ostrich code base.
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> Hope he finds the time and the inclination!
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> Imtiaz
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" <
>>> >> hirsch.dick@gmail.com
>>> >> >>> >
>>> >> >>> To: <de...@esme.apache.org>
>>> >> >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8:33 PM
>>> >> >>> Subject: Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>  I think they (twitter) decided that the HTTP-based stats was enough
>>> or
>>> >> >>>> the JMX scala code conflicted with the new Scala version.
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>>> >> lester.mail@gmail.com>
>>> >> >>>> wrote:
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>>> Yes, I wasn't able to find any replacement too. I also tried to
>>> find
>>> >> any
>>> >> >>>>> forum or group to ask about this modification, but it seems
>>> there's
>>> >> no
>>> >> >>>>> other
>>> >> >>>>> resources dedicated to this project besides GitHub.
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>> Next step is to find the reason of failed tests.
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>> OK - sounds good
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>>> Vladimir
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>> 2011/7/27 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>  Looked at the code last night and this morning. The JMX support
>>> has
>>> >> >>>>>> been totally removed.
>>> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>> I had a quick look and didn't find anything that might be a
>>> >> >>>>>> replacement. In the meantime, we'll have to just use the
>>> HTTP-based
>>> >> >>>>>> interface.
>>> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>> D.
>>> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>>> >> lester.mail@gmail.com
>>> >> >>>>>> >
>>> >> >>>>>> wrote:
>>> >> >>>>>> > Thank you, Dick!
>>> >> >>>>>> >
>>> >> >>>>>> > Here is the link to Ostrich's GitHub repo changeset with
>>> >> StatsMBean >
>>> >> >>>>>> class
>>> >> >>>>>> > removed:
>>> >> >>>>>> >
>>> >> >>>>>> https://github.com/twitter/**ostrich/commit/**
>>> >> >>>>>> 5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78**309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/**
>>> >> >>>>>> twitter/ostrich<
>>> >>
>>> https://github.com/twitter/ostrich/commit/5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/twitter/ostrich
>>> >> >
>>> >> >>>>>> >
>>> >> >>>>>> > May be it helps somehow.
>>> >> >>>>>> >
>>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir
>>> >> >>>>>> >
>>> >> >>>>>> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>>> >> >>>>>> >
>>> >> >>>>>> >> OK - I'll take a look at it tonight
>>> >> >>>>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>>> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov >> <
>>> >> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
>>> >> >>>>>> >
>>> >> >>>>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> >>>>>> >> > Yes, I had to comment it out.
>>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>>> >> >>>>>> >> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>>> >> >>>>>> >> >> Great.
>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>>>>> >> >> Let me take a look for the StatsMBean replacement. Did you
>>> >> comment
>>> >> >>>>>> out
>>> >> >>>>>> >> >> the usage of StatsMBean to get ESME to compile?
>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>>>>> >> >> D.
>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>>>>> >> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>>> >> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
>>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>>> >> >>>>>> >> >> wrote:
>>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > Configgy is not used for configuration anymore
>>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - Package and method names were changed
>>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - There's no more StatsMBean class (and I have no idea
>>> >> whether
>>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > any
>>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > replacement is available).
>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>>> >> >>>>>> >> > --
>>> >> >>>>>> >> > Best Regards,
>>> >> >>>>>> >> > Vladimir Ivanov
>>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>>> >> >>>>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>>> >
>>> >> >>>>>> >
>>> >> >>>>>> >
>>> >> >>>>>> > --
>>> >> >>>>>> > Best Regards,
>>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir Ivanov
>>> >> >>>>>> >
>>> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>> --
>>> >> >>>>> Best Regards,
>>> >> >>>>> Vladimir Ivanov
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> --
>>> >> >> Best Regards,
>>> >> >> Vladimir Ivanov
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Best Regards,
>>> > Vladimir Ivanov
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Vladimir Ivanov
>>
>

Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x

[Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>]

Hi Vladimir and all,

Hmmm, I guess it depends on whether or not upgrading is required for
our 1.4 release. Personally, I think that because of the Textile fixes
(at least) we should shoot to include it, in which case we could merge
it back in without waiting. This would result in it getting more
testing from me, since I at least am developing on trunk and not the
Lift 2.4 branch.

Thoughts?

Ethan

2011/9/13 Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Ethan,
>
> Sorry for the late response.
>
> I've fixed сompile-time errors and commited changes, but I think we need
> more time to test it. Moreover I had to remove some members from MsgParser
> class because they dublicated definitions in Textile's superclass (in its
> new version). Some of them were exactly the same, other were slightly
> different. So it would be ideal if Vassil find time to review it.
>
> I would wait for at least RC, but if you guys decide that it's neccessary
> right now - why not?
>
> Vladimir
>
> 2011/9/11 Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>
>
>> Hi Vladimir,
>>
>> Seems like we should get the branch merged back in to trunk soon. Do
>> you think it would be best to do that on the current 2.4M4, or would
>> it be wiser to wait until later?
>>
>> Ethan
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > As Vassil noted, the most important one is Textile update.
>> >
>> > Among other fixes I would also mention fix for dublicated context path
>> > problem:
>> >
>> http://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1082-redirectresponse-duplicates-contextpath
>> >
>> > There were many reports and question on StackOverflow regarding this
>> issue.
>> >
>> > Vladimir
>> >
>> > 2011/9/10 Vassil Dichev <vd...@apache.org>
>> >
>> >> It should fix the long-standing ESME-307 (Textile and punctuation)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Thanks for the update.
>> >> >
>> >> > Are there any new features in the release that might be of interest to
>> >> ESME?
>> >> >
>> >> > D.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> lester.mail@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >> Below is an small update on current status for Lift 2.4 branch.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Lift-2.4M4 was announced yesterday:
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/f695772c254219b2
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I've updated project files to new version, but it doesn't compile due
>> to
>> >> >> changes in Loc.Snippet class (it's neccessary to explicitly specify _
>> in
>> >> >> order to compiler recognize that Snippet's parameter is a function).
>> See
>> >> >> following link for more details:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply()+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1<http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply%28%29+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I suppose this issue is easy to fix, but it will take some time for
>> me
>> >> due
>> >> >> to extremly high workload (even on this weekend :s( ).
>> >> >>
>> >> >> M4 will also make possible moving to 2.9.1 Scala version (after all
>> >> >> dependencies are updated accordingly).
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Vladimir
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2011/7/27 <in...@gmail.com>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> Going by the content of the discussion on this topic for the last
>> >> couple of
>> >> >>> days, it should be possible for Vladimir to implement the
>> replacement,
>> >> if
>> >> >>> not just port the code from the old Ostrich code base.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Hope he finds the time and the inclination!
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Imtiaz
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" <
>> >> hirsch.dick@gmail.com
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> To: <de...@esme.apache.org>
>> >> >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8:33 PM
>> >> >>> Subject: Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>  I think they (twitter) decided that the HTTP-based stats was enough
>> or
>> >> >>>> the JMX scala code conflicted with the new Scala version.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >> lester.mail@gmail.com>
>> >> >>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>> Yes, I wasn't able to find any replacement too. I also tried to
>> find
>> >> any
>> >> >>>>> forum or group to ask about this modification, but it seems
>> there's
>> >> no
>> >> >>>>> other
>> >> >>>>> resources dedicated to this project besides GitHub.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Next step is to find the reason of failed tests.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> OK - sounds good
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>> Vladimir
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> 2011/7/27 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>  Looked at the code last night and this morning. The JMX support
>> has
>> >> >>>>>> been totally removed.
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> I had a quick look and didn't find anything that might be a
>> >> >>>>>> replacement. In the meantime, we'll have to just use the
>> HTTP-based
>> >> >>>>>> interface.
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> D.
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >> lester.mail@gmail.com
>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>> > Thank you, Dick!
>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>>>>> > Here is the link to Ostrich's GitHub repo changeset with
>> >> StatsMBean >
>> >> >>>>>> class
>> >> >>>>>> > removed:
>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>>>>> https://github.com/twitter/**ostrich/commit/**
>> >> >>>>>> 5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78**309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/**
>> >> >>>>>> twitter/ostrich<
>> >>
>> https://github.com/twitter/ostrich/commit/5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/twitter/ostrich
>> >> >
>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>>>>> > May be it helps somehow.
>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir
>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>>>>> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>>>>> >> OK - I'll take a look at it tonight
>> >> >>>>>> >>
>> >> >>>>>> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov >> <
>> >> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>>>>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>> >> > Yes, I had to comment it out.
>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >>>>>> >> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> Great.
>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> Let me take a look for the StatsMBean replacement. Did you
>> >> comment
>> >> >>>>>> out
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> the usage of StatsMBean to get ESME to compile?
>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> D.
>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > Configgy is not used for configuration anymore
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - Package and method names were changed
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - There's no more StatsMBean class (and I have no idea
>> >> whether
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > any
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > replacement is available).
>> >> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >>>>>> >> > --
>> >> >>>>>> >> > Best Regards,
>> >> >>>>>> >> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >> >>>>>> >> >
>> >> >>>>>> >>
>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>>>>> > --
>> >> >>>>>> > Best Regards,
>> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >> >>>>>> >
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> --
>> >> >>>>> Best Regards,
>> >> >>>>> Vladimir Ivanov
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Best Regards,
>> >> >> Vladimir Ivanov
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Vladimir Ivanov
>

Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x

[Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>]

Hi Ethan,

Sorry for the late response.

I've fixed сompile-time errors and commited changes, but I think we need
more time to test it. Moreover I had to remove some members from MsgParser
class because they dublicated definitions in Textile's superclass (in its
new version). Some of them were exactly the same, other were slightly
different. So it would be ideal if Vassil find time to review it.

I would wait for at least RC, but if you guys decide that it's neccessary
right now - why not?

Vladimir

2011/9/11 Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>

> Hi Vladimir,
>
> Seems like we should get the branch merged back in to trunk soon. Do
> you think it would be best to do that on the current 2.4M4, or would
> it be wiser to wait until later?
>
> Ethan
>
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > As Vassil noted, the most important one is Textile update.
> >
> > Among other fixes I would also mention fix for dublicated context path
> > problem:
> >
> http://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1082-redirectresponse-duplicates-contextpath
> >
> > There were many reports and question on StackOverflow regarding this
> issue.
> >
> > Vladimir
> >
> > 2011/9/10 Vassil Dichev <vd...@apache.org>
> >
> >> It should fix the long-standing ESME-307 (Textile and punctuation)
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Thanks for the update.
> >> >
> >> > Are there any new features in the release that might be of interest to
> >> ESME?
> >> >
> >> > D.
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> lester.mail@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> Below is an small update on current status for Lift 2.4 branch.
> >> >>
> >> >> Lift-2.4M4 was announced yesterday:
> >> >>
> >>
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/f695772c254219b2
> >> >>
> >> >> I've updated project files to new version, but it doesn't compile due
> to
> >> >> changes in Loc.Snippet class (it's neccessary to explicitly specify _
> in
> >> >> order to compiler recognize that Snippet's parameter is a function).
> See
> >> >> following link for more details:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply()+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1<http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply%28%29+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1>
> >> >>
> >> >> I suppose this issue is easy to fix, but it will take some time for
> me
> >> due
> >> >> to extremly high workload (even on this weekend :s( ).
> >> >>
> >> >> M4 will also make possible moving to 2.9.1 Scala version (after all
> >> >> dependencies are updated accordingly).
> >> >>
> >> >> Vladimir
> >> >>
> >> >> 2011/7/27 <in...@gmail.com>
> >> >>
> >> >>> Going by the content of the discussion on this topic for the last
> >> couple of
> >> >>> days, it should be possible for Vladimir to implement the
> replacement,
> >> if
> >> >>> not just port the code from the old Ostrich code base.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Hope he finds the time and the inclination!
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Imtiaz
> >> >>>
> >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" <
> >> hirsch.dick@gmail.com
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> To: <de...@esme.apache.org>
> >> >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8:33 PM
> >> >>> Subject: Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>  I think they (twitter) decided that the HTTP-based stats was enough
> or
> >> >>>> the JMX scala code conflicted with the new Scala version.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> >> lester.mail@gmail.com>
> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> Yes, I wasn't able to find any replacement too. I also tried to
> find
> >> any
> >> >>>>> forum or group to ask about this modification, but it seems
> there's
> >> no
> >> >>>>> other
> >> >>>>> resources dedicated to this project besides GitHub.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Next step is to find the reason of failed tests.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> OK - sounds good
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> Vladimir
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> 2011/7/27 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>  Looked at the code last night and this morning. The JMX support
> has
> >> >>>>>> been totally removed.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> I had a quick look and didn't find anything that might be a
> >> >>>>>> replacement. In the meantime, we'll have to just use the
> HTTP-based
> >> >>>>>> interface.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> D.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> >> lester.mail@gmail.com
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>> > Thank you, Dick!
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>> > Here is the link to Ostrich's GitHub repo changeset with
> >> StatsMBean >
> >> >>>>>> class
> >> >>>>>> > removed:
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>> https://github.com/twitter/**ostrich/commit/**
> >> >>>>>> 5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78**309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/**
> >> >>>>>> twitter/ostrich<
> >>
> https://github.com/twitter/ostrich/commit/5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/twitter/ostrich
> >> >
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>> > May be it helps somehow.
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>> >> OK - I'll take a look at it tonight
> >> >>>>>> >>
> >> >>>>>> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov >> <
> >> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>> >> wrote:
> >> >>>>>> >> > Yes, I had to comment it out.
> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >>>>>> >> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >>>>>> >> >> Great.
> >> >>>>>> >> >>
> >> >>>>>> >> >> Let me take a look for the StatsMBean replacement. Did you
> >> comment
> >> >>>>>> out
> >> >>>>>> >> >> the usage of StatsMBean to get ESME to compile?
> >> >>>>>> >> >>
> >> >>>>>> >> >> D.
> >> >>>>>> >> >>
> >> >>>>>> >> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> >> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >>>>>> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>>>>> >> >> > Configgy is not used for configuration anymore
> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - Package and method names were changed
> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - There's no more StatsMBean class (and I have no idea
> >> whether
> >> >>>>>> >> >> > any
> >> >>>>>> >> >> > replacement is available).
> >> >>>>>> >> >>
> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >>>>>> >> > --
> >> >>>>>> >> > Best Regards,
> >> >>>>>> >> > Vladimir Ivanov
> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >>>>>> >>
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>> > --
> >> >>>>>> > Best Regards,
> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir Ivanov
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> --
> >> >>>>> Best Regards,
> >> >>>>> Vladimir Ivanov
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Best Regards,
> >> >> Vladimir Ivanov
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> > Vladimir Ivanov
> >
>



-- 
Best Regards,
Vladimir Ivanov

Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x

[Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>]

Hi Vladimir,

Seems like we should get the branch merged back in to trunk soon. Do
you think it would be best to do that on the current 2.4M4, or would
it be wiser to wait until later?

Ethan

On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As Vassil noted, the most important one is Textile update.
>
> Among other fixes I would also mention fix for dublicated context path
> problem:
> http://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1082-redirectresponse-duplicates-contextpath
>
> There were many reports and question on StackOverflow regarding this issue.
>
> Vladimir
>
> 2011/9/10 Vassil Dichev <vd...@apache.org>
>
>> It should fix the long-standing ESME-307 (Textile and punctuation)
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Thanks for the update.
>> >
>> > Are there any new features in the release that might be of interest to
>> ESME?
>> >
>> > D.
>> >
>> > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> Below is an small update on current status for Lift 2.4 branch.
>> >>
>> >> Lift-2.4M4 was announced yesterday:
>> >>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/f695772c254219b2
>> >>
>> >> I've updated project files to new version, but it doesn't compile due to
>> >> changes in Loc.Snippet class (it's neccessary to explicitly specify _ in
>> >> order to compiler recognize that Snippet's parameter is a function). See
>> >> following link for more details:
>> >>
>> >>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply()+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1
>> >>
>> >> I suppose this issue is easy to fix, but it will take some time for me
>> due
>> >> to extremly high workload (even on this weekend :s( ).
>> >>
>> >> M4 will also make possible moving to 2.9.1 Scala version (after all
>> >> dependencies are updated accordingly).
>> >>
>> >> Vladimir
>> >>
>> >> 2011/7/27 <in...@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >>> Going by the content of the discussion on this topic for the last
>> couple of
>> >>> days, it should be possible for Vladimir to implement the replacement,
>> if
>> >>> not just port the code from the old Ostrich code base.
>> >>>
>> >>> Hope he finds the time and the inclination!
>> >>>
>> >>> Imtiaz
>> >>>
>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" <
>> hirsch.dick@gmail.com
>> >>> >
>> >>> To: <de...@esme.apache.org>
>> >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8:33 PM
>> >>> Subject: Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>  I think they (twitter) decided that the HTTP-based stats was enough or
>> >>>> the JMX scala code conflicted with the new Scala version.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> lester.mail@gmail.com>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Yes, I wasn't able to find any replacement too. I also tried to find
>> any
>> >>>>> forum or group to ask about this modification, but it seems there's
>> no
>> >>>>> other
>> >>>>> resources dedicated to this project besides GitHub.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Next step is to find the reason of failed tests.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> OK - sounds good
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Vladimir
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> 2011/7/27 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>  Looked at the code last night and this morning. The JMX support has
>> >>>>>> been totally removed.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I had a quick look and didn't find anything that might be a
>> >>>>>> replacement. In the meantime, we'll have to just use the HTTP-based
>> >>>>>> interface.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> D.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> lester.mail@gmail.com
>> >>>>>> >
>> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>> > Thank you, Dick!
>> >>>>>> >
>> >>>>>> > Here is the link to Ostrich's GitHub repo changeset with
>> StatsMBean >
>> >>>>>> class
>> >>>>>> > removed:
>> >>>>>> >
>> >>>>>> https://github.com/twitter/**ostrich/commit/**
>> >>>>>> 5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78**309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/**
>> >>>>>> twitter/ostrich<
>> https://github.com/twitter/ostrich/commit/5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/twitter/ostrich
>> >
>> >>>>>> >
>> >>>>>> > May be it helps somehow.
>> >>>>>> >
>> >>>>>> > Vladimir
>> >>>>>> >
>> >>>>>> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>> >
>> >>>>>> >> OK - I'll take a look at it tonight
>> >>>>>> >>
>> >>>>>> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov >> <
>> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
>> >>>>>> >
>> >>>>>> >> wrote:
>> >>>>>> >> > Yes, I had to comment it out.
>> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>>>>> >> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>>>>> >> >> Great.
>> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >>>>>> >> >> Let me take a look for the StatsMBean replacement. Did you
>> comment
>> >>>>>> out
>> >>>>>> >> >> the usage of StatsMBean to get ESME to compile?
>> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >>>>>> >> >> D.
>> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >>>>>> >> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
>> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>>>>> >> >> wrote:
>> >>>>>> >> >> > Configgy is not used for configuration anymore
>> >>>>>> >> >> > - Package and method names were changed
>> >>>>>> >> >> > - There's no more StatsMBean class (and I have no idea
>> whether
>> >>>>>> >> >> > any
>> >>>>>> >> >> > replacement is available).
>> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>>>>> >> > --
>> >>>>>> >> > Best Regards,
>> >>>>>> >> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>>>>> >>
>> >>>>>> >
>> >>>>>> >
>> >>>>>> >
>> >>>>>> > --
>> >>>>>> > Best Regards,
>> >>>>>> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >>>>>> >
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> Best Regards,
>> >>>>> Vladimir Ivanov
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Best Regards,
>> >> Vladimir Ivanov
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Vladimir Ivanov
>

Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x

[Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>]

Richard,

I think not in this case - it was introduced in 2.4-M3.

Vladimir

2011/9/11 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>

> Sounds good - I think 1082 might be one reason why we always had
> problems when we deployed on Tomcat.
>
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > As Vassil noted, the most important one is Textile update.
> >
> > Among other fixes I would also mention fix for dublicated context path
> > problem:
> >
> http://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1082-redirectresponse-duplicates-contextpath
> >
> > There were many reports and question on StackOverflow regarding this
> issue.
> >
> > Vladimir
> >
> > 2011/9/10 Vassil Dichev <vd...@apache.org>
> >
> >> It should fix the long-standing ESME-307 (Textile and punctuation)
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Thanks for the update.
> >> >
> >> > Are there any new features in the release that might be of interest to
> >> ESME?
> >> >
> >> > D.
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> lester.mail@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> Below is an small update on current status for Lift 2.4 branch.
> >> >>
> >> >> Lift-2.4M4 was announced yesterday:
> >> >>
> >>
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/f695772c254219b2
> >> >>
> >> >> I've updated project files to new version, but it doesn't compile due
> to
> >> >> changes in Loc.Snippet class (it's neccessary to explicitly specify _
> in
> >> >> order to compiler recognize that Snippet's parameter is a function).
> See
> >> >> following link for more details:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply()+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1
> >> >>
> >> >> I suppose this issue is easy to fix, but it will take some time for
> me
> >> due
> >> >> to extremly high workload (even on this weekend :s( ).
> >> >>
> >> >> M4 will also make possible moving to 2.9.1 Scala version (after all
> >> >> dependencies are updated accordingly).
> >> >>
> >> >> Vladimir
> >> >>
> >> >> 2011/7/27 <in...@gmail.com>
> >> >>
> >> >>> Going by the content of the discussion on this topic for the last
> >> couple of
> >> >>> days, it should be possible for Vladimir to implement the
> replacement,
> >> if
> >> >>> not just port the code from the old Ostrich code base.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Hope he finds the time and the inclination!
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Imtiaz
> >> >>>
> >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" <
> >> hirsch.dick@gmail.com
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> To: <de...@esme.apache.org>
> >> >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8:33 PM
> >> >>> Subject: Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>  I think they (twitter) decided that the HTTP-based stats was enough
> or
> >> >>>> the JMX scala code conflicted with the new Scala version.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> >> lester.mail@gmail.com>
> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> Yes, I wasn't able to find any replacement too. I also tried to
> find
> >> any
> >> >>>>> forum or group to ask about this modification, but it seems
> there's
> >> no
> >> >>>>> other
> >> >>>>> resources dedicated to this project besides GitHub.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Next step is to find the reason of failed tests.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> OK - sounds good
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> Vladimir
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> 2011/7/27 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>  Looked at the code last night and this morning. The JMX support
> has
> >> >>>>>> been totally removed.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> I had a quick look and didn't find anything that might be a
> >> >>>>>> replacement. In the meantime, we'll have to just use the
> HTTP-based
> >> >>>>>> interface.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> D.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> >> lester.mail@gmail.com
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>> > Thank you, Dick!
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>> > Here is the link to Ostrich's GitHub repo changeset with
> >> StatsMBean >
> >> >>>>>> class
> >> >>>>>> > removed:
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>> https://github.com/twitter/**ostrich/commit/**
> >> >>>>>> 5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78**309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/**
> >> >>>>>> twitter/ostrich<
> >>
> https://github.com/twitter/ostrich/commit/5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/twitter/ostrich
> >> >
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>> > May be it helps somehow.
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>> >> OK - I'll take a look at it tonight
> >> >>>>>> >>
> >> >>>>>> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov >> <
> >> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>> >> wrote:
> >> >>>>>> >> > Yes, I had to comment it out.
> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >>>>>> >> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >>>>>> >> >> Great.
> >> >>>>>> >> >>
> >> >>>>>> >> >> Let me take a look for the StatsMBean replacement. Did you
> >> comment
> >> >>>>>> out
> >> >>>>>> >> >> the usage of StatsMBean to get ESME to compile?
> >> >>>>>> >> >>
> >> >>>>>> >> >> D.
> >> >>>>>> >> >>
> >> >>>>>> >> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> >> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >>>>>> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>>>>> >> >> > Configgy is not used for configuration anymore
> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - Package and method names were changed
> >> >>>>>> >> >> > - There's no more StatsMBean class (and I have no idea
> >> whether
> >> >>>>>> >> >> > any
> >> >>>>>> >> >> > replacement is available).
> >> >>>>>> >> >>
> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >>>>>> >> > --
> >> >>>>>> >> > Best Regards,
> >> >>>>>> >> > Vladimir Ivanov
> >> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >>>>>> >>
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>> > --
> >> >>>>>> > Best Regards,
> >> >>>>>> > Vladimir Ivanov
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> --
> >> >>>>> Best Regards,
> >> >>>>> Vladimir Ivanov
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Best Regards,
> >> >> Vladimir Ivanov
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> > Vladimir Ivanov
> >
>



-- 
Best Regards,
Vladimir Ivanov

Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x

[Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>]

Sounds good - I think 1082 might be one reason why we always had
problems when we deployed on Tomcat.

On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As Vassil noted, the most important one is Textile update.
>
> Among other fixes I would also mention fix for dublicated context path
> problem:
> http://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1082-redirectresponse-duplicates-contextpath
>
> There were many reports and question on StackOverflow regarding this issue.
>
> Vladimir
>
> 2011/9/10 Vassil Dichev <vd...@apache.org>
>
>> It should fix the long-standing ESME-307 (Textile and punctuation)
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Thanks for the update.
>> >
>> > Are there any new features in the release that might be of interest to
>> ESME?
>> >
>> > D.
>> >
>> > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> Below is an small update on current status for Lift 2.4 branch.
>> >>
>> >> Lift-2.4M4 was announced yesterday:
>> >>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/f695772c254219b2
>> >>
>> >> I've updated project files to new version, but it doesn't compile due to
>> >> changes in Loc.Snippet class (it's neccessary to explicitly specify _ in
>> >> order to compiler recognize that Snippet's parameter is a function). See
>> >> following link for more details:
>> >>
>> >>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply()+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1
>> >>
>> >> I suppose this issue is easy to fix, but it will take some time for me
>> due
>> >> to extremly high workload (even on this weekend :s( ).
>> >>
>> >> M4 will also make possible moving to 2.9.1 Scala version (after all
>> >> dependencies are updated accordingly).
>> >>
>> >> Vladimir
>> >>
>> >> 2011/7/27 <in...@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >>> Going by the content of the discussion on this topic for the last
>> couple of
>> >>> days, it should be possible for Vladimir to implement the replacement,
>> if
>> >>> not just port the code from the old Ostrich code base.
>> >>>
>> >>> Hope he finds the time and the inclination!
>> >>>
>> >>> Imtiaz
>> >>>
>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" <
>> hirsch.dick@gmail.com
>> >>> >
>> >>> To: <de...@esme.apache.org>
>> >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8:33 PM
>> >>> Subject: Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>  I think they (twitter) decided that the HTTP-based stats was enough or
>> >>>> the JMX scala code conflicted with the new Scala version.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> lester.mail@gmail.com>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Yes, I wasn't able to find any replacement too. I also tried to find
>> any
>> >>>>> forum or group to ask about this modification, but it seems there's
>> no
>> >>>>> other
>> >>>>> resources dedicated to this project besides GitHub.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Next step is to find the reason of failed tests.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> OK - sounds good
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Vladimir
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> 2011/7/27 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>  Looked at the code last night and this morning. The JMX support has
>> >>>>>> been totally removed.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I had a quick look and didn't find anything that might be a
>> >>>>>> replacement. In the meantime, we'll have to just use the HTTP-based
>> >>>>>> interface.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> D.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> lester.mail@gmail.com
>> >>>>>> >
>> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>> > Thank you, Dick!
>> >>>>>> >
>> >>>>>> > Here is the link to Ostrich's GitHub repo changeset with
>> StatsMBean >
>> >>>>>> class
>> >>>>>> > removed:
>> >>>>>> >
>> >>>>>> https://github.com/twitter/**ostrich/commit/**
>> >>>>>> 5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78**309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/**
>> >>>>>> twitter/ostrich<
>> https://github.com/twitter/ostrich/commit/5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/twitter/ostrich
>> >
>> >>>>>> >
>> >>>>>> > May be it helps somehow.
>> >>>>>> >
>> >>>>>> > Vladimir
>> >>>>>> >
>> >>>>>> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>> >
>> >>>>>> >> OK - I'll take a look at it tonight
>> >>>>>> >>
>> >>>>>> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov >> <
>> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
>> >>>>>> >
>> >>>>>> >> wrote:
>> >>>>>> >> > Yes, I had to comment it out.
>> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>>>>> >> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>>>>> >> >> Great.
>> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >>>>>> >> >> Let me take a look for the StatsMBean replacement. Did you
>> comment
>> >>>>>> out
>> >>>>>> >> >> the usage of StatsMBean to get ESME to compile?
>> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >>>>>> >> >> D.
>> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >>>>>> >> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
>> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>>>>> >> >> wrote:
>> >>>>>> >> >> > Configgy is not used for configuration anymore
>> >>>>>> >> >> > - Package and method names were changed
>> >>>>>> >> >> > - There's no more StatsMBean class (and I have no idea
>> whether
>> >>>>>> >> >> > any
>> >>>>>> >> >> > replacement is available).
>> >>>>>> >> >>
>> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>>>>> >> > --
>> >>>>>> >> > Best Regards,
>> >>>>>> >> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >>>>>> >> >
>> >>>>>> >>
>> >>>>>> >
>> >>>>>> >
>> >>>>>> >
>> >>>>>> > --
>> >>>>>> > Best Regards,
>> >>>>>> > Vladimir Ivanov
>> >>>>>> >
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> Best Regards,
>> >>>>> Vladimir Ivanov
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Best Regards,
>> >> Vladimir Ivanov
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Vladimir Ivanov
>

Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x

[Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>]

As Vassil noted, the most important one is Textile update.

Among other fixes I would also mention fix for dublicated context path
problem:
http://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/1082-redirectresponse-duplicates-contextpath

There were many reports and question on StackOverflow regarding this issue.

Vladimir

2011/9/10 Vassil Dichev <vd...@apache.org>

> It should fix the long-standing ESME-307 (Textile and punctuation)
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Thanks for the update.
> >
> > Are there any new features in the release that might be of interest to
> ESME?
> >
> > D.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Below is an small update on current status for Lift 2.4 branch.
> >>
> >> Lift-2.4M4 was announced yesterday:
> >>
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/f695772c254219b2
> >>
> >> I've updated project files to new version, but it doesn't compile due to
> >> changes in Loc.Snippet class (it's neccessary to explicitly specify _ in
> >> order to compiler recognize that Snippet's parameter is a function). See
> >> following link for more details:
> >>
> >>
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply()+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1
> >>
> >> I suppose this issue is easy to fix, but it will take some time for me
> due
> >> to extremly high workload (even on this weekend :s( ).
> >>
> >> M4 will also make possible moving to 2.9.1 Scala version (after all
> >> dependencies are updated accordingly).
> >>
> >> Vladimir
> >>
> >> 2011/7/27 <in...@gmail.com>
> >>
> >>> Going by the content of the discussion on this topic for the last
> couple of
> >>> days, it should be possible for Vladimir to implement the replacement,
> if
> >>> not just port the code from the old Ostrich code base.
> >>>
> >>> Hope he finds the time and the inclination!
> >>>
> >>> Imtiaz
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" <
> hirsch.dick@gmail.com
> >>> >
> >>> To: <de...@esme.apache.org>
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8:33 PM
> >>> Subject: Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>  I think they (twitter) decided that the HTTP-based stats was enough or
> >>>> the JMX scala code conflicted with the new Scala version.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> lester.mail@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Yes, I wasn't able to find any replacement too. I also tried to find
> any
> >>>>> forum or group to ask about this modification, but it seems there's
> no
> >>>>> other
> >>>>> resources dedicated to this project besides GitHub.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Next step is to find the reason of failed tests.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> OK - sounds good
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Vladimir
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2011/7/27 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  Looked at the code last night and this morning. The JMX support has
> >>>>>> been totally removed.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I had a quick look and didn't find anything that might be a
> >>>>>> replacement. In the meantime, we'll have to just use the HTTP-based
> >>>>>> interface.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> D.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> lester.mail@gmail.com
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> > Thank you, Dick!
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > Here is the link to Ostrich's GitHub repo changeset with
> StatsMBean >
> >>>>>> class
> >>>>>> > removed:
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> https://github.com/twitter/**ostrich/commit/**
> >>>>>> 5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78**309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/**
> >>>>>> twitter/ostrich<
> https://github.com/twitter/ostrich/commit/5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/twitter/ostrich
> >
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > May be it helps somehow.
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > Vladimir
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> >> OK - I'll take a look at it tonight
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov >> <
> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> >> wrote:
> >>>>>> >> > Yes, I had to comment it out.
> >>>>>> >> >
> >>>>>> >> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> >> >
> >>>>>> >> >> Great.
> >>>>>> >> >>
> >>>>>> >> >> Let me take a look for the StatsMBean replacement. Did you
> comment
> >>>>>> out
> >>>>>> >> >> the usage of StatsMBean to get ESME to compile?
> >>>>>> >> >>
> >>>>>> >> >> D.
> >>>>>> >> >>
> >>>>>> >> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
> >>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
> >>>>>> >> >
> >>>>>> >> >> wrote:
> >>>>>> >> >> > Configgy is not used for configuration anymore
> >>>>>> >> >> > - Package and method names were changed
> >>>>>> >> >> > - There's no more StatsMBean class (and I have no idea
> whether
> >>>>>> >> >> > any
> >>>>>> >> >> > replacement is available).
> >>>>>> >> >>
> >>>>>> >> >
> >>>>>> >> >
> >>>>>> >> >
> >>>>>> >> > --
> >>>>>> >> > Best Regards,
> >>>>>> >> > Vladimir Ivanov
> >>>>>> >> >
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > --
> >>>>>> > Best Regards,
> >>>>>> > Vladimir Ivanov
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>> Vladimir Ivanov
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Vladimir Ivanov
> >>
> >
>



-- 
Best Regards,
Vladimir Ivanov

Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x

[Vassil Dichev <vd...@apache.org>]

It should fix the long-standing ESME-307 (Textile and punctuation)


On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the update.
>
> Are there any new features in the release that might be of interest to ESME?
>
> D.
>
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Below is an small update on current status for Lift 2.4 branch.
>>
>> Lift-2.4M4 was announced yesterday:
>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/f695772c254219b2
>>
>> I've updated project files to new version, but it doesn't compile due to
>> changes in Loc.Snippet class (it's neccessary to explicitly specify _ in
>> order to compiler recognize that Snippet's parameter is a function). See
>> following link for more details:
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply()+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1
>>
>> I suppose this issue is easy to fix, but it will take some time for me due
>> to extremly high workload (even on this weekend :s( ).
>>
>> M4 will also make possible moving to 2.9.1 Scala version (after all
>> dependencies are updated accordingly).
>>
>> Vladimir
>>
>> 2011/7/27 <in...@gmail.com>
>>
>>> Going by the content of the discussion on this topic for the last couple of
>>> days, it should be possible for Vladimir to implement the replacement, if
>>> not just port the code from the old Ostrich code base.
>>>
>>> Hope he finds the time and the inclination!
>>>
>>> Imtiaz
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" <hirsch.dick@gmail.com
>>> >
>>> To: <de...@esme.apache.org>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8:33 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  I think they (twitter) decided that the HTTP-based stats was enough or
>>>> the JMX scala code conflicted with the new Scala version.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I wasn't able to find any replacement too. I also tried to find any
>>>>> forum or group to ask about this modification, but it seems there's no
>>>>> other
>>>>> resources dedicated to this project besides GitHub.
>>>>>
>>>>> Next step is to find the reason of failed tests.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> OK - sounds good
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Vladimir
>>>>>
>>>>> 2011/7/27 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>  Looked at the code last night and this morning. The JMX support has
>>>>>> been totally removed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I had a quick look and didn't find anything that might be a
>>>>>> replacement. In the meantime, we'll have to just use the HTTP-based
>>>>>> interface.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> D.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <lester.mail@gmail.com
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> > Thank you, Dick!
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Here is the link to Ostrich's GitHub repo changeset with StatsMBean >
>>>>>> class
>>>>>> > removed:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> https://github.com/twitter/**ostrich/commit/**
>>>>>> 5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78**309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/**
>>>>>> twitter/ostrich<https://github.com/twitter/ostrich/commit/5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/twitter/ostrich>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > May be it helps somehow.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Vladimir
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >> OK - I'll take a look at it tonight
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov >> <
>>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>>> >> > Yes, I had to comment it out.
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >> Great.
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> Let me take a look for the StatsMBean replacement. Did you comment
>>>>>> out
>>>>>> >> >> the usage of StatsMBean to get ESME to compile?
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> D.
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >> wrote:
>>>>>> >> >> > Configgy is not used for configuration anymore
>>>>>> >> >> > - Package and method names were changed
>>>>>> >> >> > - There's no more StatsMBean class (and I have no idea whether
>>>>>> >> >> > any
>>>>>> >> >> > replacement is available).
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > --
>>>>>> >> > Best Regards,
>>>>>> >> > Vladimir Ivanov
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > --
>>>>>> > Best Regards,
>>>>>> > Vladimir Ivanov
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>> Vladimir Ivanov
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Vladimir Ivanov
>>
>

Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x

[Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>]

Thanks for the update.

Are there any new features in the release that might be of interest to ESME?

D.

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Below is an small update on current status for Lift 2.4 branch.
>
> Lift-2.4M4 was announced yesterday:
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/f695772c254219b2
>
> I've updated project files to new version, but it doesn't compile due to
> changes in Loc.Snippet class (it's neccessary to explicitly specify _ in
> order to compiler recognize that Snippet's parameter is a function). See
> following link for more details:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/1bf211102812615b/816299dd5a4dbff1?lnk=gst&q=Updated+object+Snippet+apply()+causing#816299dd5a4dbff1
>
> I suppose this issue is easy to fix, but it will take some time for me due
> to extremly high workload (even on this weekend :s( ).
>
> M4 will also make possible moving to 2.9.1 Scala version (after all
> dependencies are updated accordingly).
>
> Vladimir
>
> 2011/7/27 <in...@gmail.com>
>
>> Going by the content of the discussion on this topic for the last couple of
>> days, it should be possible for Vladimir to implement the replacement, if
>> not just port the code from the old Ostrich code base.
>>
>> Hope he finds the time and the inclination!
>>
>> Imtiaz
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" <hirsch.dick@gmail.com
>> >
>> To: <de...@esme.apache.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8:33 PM
>> Subject: Re: Lift 2.4 and Scala 2.9.x
>>
>>
>>
>>  I think they (twitter) decided that the HTTP-based stats was enough or
>>> the JMX scala code conflicted with the new Scala version.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <le...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, I wasn't able to find any replacement too. I also tried to find any
>>>> forum or group to ask about this modification, but it seems there's no
>>>> other
>>>> resources dedicated to this project besides GitHub.
>>>>
>>>> Next step is to find the reason of failed tests.
>>>>
>>>
>>> OK - sounds good
>>>
>>>
>>>> Vladimir
>>>>
>>>> 2011/7/27 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>>  Looked at the code last night and this morning. The JMX support has
>>>>> been totally removed.
>>>>>
>>>>> I had a quick look and didn't find anything that might be a
>>>>> replacement. In the meantime, we'll have to just use the HTTP-based
>>>>> interface.
>>>>>
>>>>> D.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <lester.mail@gmail.com
>>>>> >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > Thank you, Dick!
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Here is the link to Ostrich's GitHub repo changeset with StatsMBean >
>>>>> class
>>>>> > removed:
>>>>> >
>>>>> https://github.com/twitter/**ostrich/commit/**
>>>>> 5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78**309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/**
>>>>> twitter/ostrich<https://github.com/twitter/ostrich/commit/5e6e557f0fab77282bc7ccd2113a78309db908b0#src/main/scala/com/twitter/ostrich>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > May be it helps somehow.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Vladimir
>>>>> >
>>>>> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> OK - I'll take a look at it tonight
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov >> <
>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>> >> > Yes, I had to comment it out.
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > 2011/7/26 Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >> Great.
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> Let me take a look for the StatsMBean replacement. Did you comment
>>>>> out
>>>>> >> >> the usage of StatsMBean to get ESME to compile?
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> D.
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Vladimir Ivanov <
>>>>> lester.mail@gmail.com
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >> wrote:
>>>>> >> >> > Configgy is not used for configuration anymore
>>>>> >> >> > - Package and method names were changed
>>>>> >> >> > - There's no more StatsMBean class (and I have no idea whether
>>>>> >> >> > any
>>>>> >> >> > replacement is available).
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > --
>>>>> >> > Best Regards,
>>>>> >> > Vladimir Ivanov
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>> > Best Regards,
>>>>> > Vladimir Ivanov
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Vladimir Ivanov
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Vladimir Ivanov
>