You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to c-dev@xerces.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2001/11/04 08:15:13 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4626] - samples/StdInParse insufficiently useful

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4626>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4626

samples/StdInParse insufficiently useful

jason@openinformatics.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX



------- Additional Comments From jason@openinformatics.com  2001-11-03 23:15 -------
I agree, StdInParse is not very useful. 

However, it's not meant to be. It's merely meant as an example of how to use the
StdInInputSource class. If you'd like a more generally useful utility look at
DOMCount, SAXCount, or SAX2Count. Or better yet, use nsgmls.

That said. I think it would be great if you submitted a better example. I'd
definately commit it into the project.

But as it stands, I think that StdInParse does what it was intended to do, be an
example of the API.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-help@xml.apache.org