You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Joshua McKenzie (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/06/01 19:35:17 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-9342) Remove
WrappingCompactionStrategy
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14567618#comment-14567618 ]
Joshua McKenzie commented on CASSANDRA-9342:
--------------------------------------------
In CompactionStrategyManager.getCompactionTask, why accept a Set<SSTableReader> when we only have the 1 caller that has to Collections.singleton() to match the signature?
Comment in WrappingCompactionStrategy appears incorrect re: filterSSTablesForReads:
{noformat}
/**
* TODO: remove, unused
*/
{noformat}
The method is referenced in a couple of places.
Fix spacing and comment why 15 in CompactionStrategyManager.getSSTableCountPerLevel:
{noformat}
int [] res = new int[15]
{noformat}
As a sanity check, I went ahead and ran unit tests on Windows and they look good.
With the above minor changes / nits, I'm +1. Clean refactor.
> Remove WrappingCompactionStrategy
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-9342
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9342
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Marcus Eriksson
> Assignee: Marcus Eriksson
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.x
>
>
> We should remove the WrappingCompactionStrategy as it is quite confusing (ie, not being a real compaction strategy that you can select when creating a table)
> It should be renamed and stop extending AbstractCompactionStrategy.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)