You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@continuum.apache.org by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net> on 2006/04/14 15:28:50 UTC
[vote] Release Continuum 1.0.3
Hi,
I've fixed some issues since latest RC (memory leak, performance...)
Here is the latest RC. Please give it a try before voting.
http://www.codehaus.org/~evenisse/continuum/
Let's do another 72h round of voting.
+1/+0/-1
Here's my +1.
Thanks,
Emmanuel
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.0.3
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>.
During continuum build? Do you have define MAVEN_OPTS env var? You need to assign at least 128M to
the build. Personally, I build Continuum on Win XP with 256M allowed.
Emmanuel
Rinku a écrit :
> Just did a latest SVN checkout of the 1.0.x branch and ran a build - I
> get OutOfMemoryErrors (noticed these with Tests). My PC is running
> decent specs - 800MB RAM, enough free space ( >10GB) and Windows XP.
> Are these not good enough for the build?
>
> Rahul
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Emmanuel Venisse"
> <em...@venisse.net>
> To: <co...@maven.apache.org>; <co...@maven.apache.org>
> Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2006 1:28 AM
> Subject: [vote] Release Continuum 1.0.3
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've fixed some issues since latest RC (memory leak, performance...)
>>
>> Here is the latest RC. Please give it a try before voting.
>> http://www.codehaus.org/~evenisse/continuum/
>>
>> Let's do another 72h round of voting.
>>
>> +1/+0/-1
>>
>> Here's my +1.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Emmanuel
>>
>
>
>
>
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.0.3
Posted by Rinku <ra...@gmail.com>.
Just did a latest SVN checkout of the 1.0.x branch and ran a build - I
get OutOfMemoryErrors (noticed these with Tests). My PC is running
decent specs - 800MB RAM, enough free space ( >10GB) and Windows XP.
Are these not good enough for the build?
Rahul
----- Original Message -----
From: "Emmanuel Venisse" <em...@venisse.net>
To: <co...@maven.apache.org>; <co...@maven.apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2006 1:28 AM
Subject: [vote] Release Continuum 1.0.3
> Hi,
>
> I've fixed some issues since latest RC (memory leak, performance...)
>
> Here is the latest RC. Please give it a try before voting.
> http://www.codehaus.org/~evenisse/continuum/
>
> Let's do another 72h round of voting.
>
> +1/+0/-1
>
> Here's my +1.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Emmanuel
>
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.0.3
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
+1
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've fixed some issues since latest RC (memory leak, performance...)
>
> Here is the latest RC. Please give it a try before voting.
> http://www.codehaus.org/~evenisse/continuum/
>
> Let's do another 72h round of voting.
>
> +1/+0/-1
>
> Here's my +1.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Emmanuel
>
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.0.3
Posted by Jason van Zyl <ja...@maven.org>.
+1
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've fixed some issues since latest RC (memory leak, performance...)
>
> Here is the latest RC. Please give it a try before voting.
> http://www.codehaus.org/~evenisse/continuum/
>
> Let's do another 72h round of voting.
>
> +1/+0/-1
>
> Here's my +1.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Emmanuel
>
>
>
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
jason at maven.org
http://maven.apache.org
We all have problems. How we deal with them is a measure of our worth.
-- Unknown
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.0.3
Posted by Arnaud HERITIER <ah...@gmail.com>.
+1
I'm testing it for some days and the memory leak seems to be fixed.
thx
arnaud
On 4/14/06, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've fixed some issues since latest RC (memory leak, performance...)
>
> Here is the latest RC. Please give it a try before voting.
> http://www.codehaus.org/~evenisse/continuum/
>
> Let's do another 72h round of voting.
>
> +1/+0/-1
>
> Here's my +1.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Emmanuel
>
>
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.0.3
Posted by Jason van Zyl <ja...@maven.org>.
+1
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've fixed some issues since latest RC (memory leak, performance...)
>
> Here is the latest RC. Please give it a try before voting.
> http://www.codehaus.org/~evenisse/continuum/
>
> Let's do another 72h round of voting.
>
> +1/+0/-1
>
> Here's my +1.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Emmanuel
>
>
>
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
jason at maven.org
http://maven.apache.org
People develop abstractions by generalizing from concrete examples.
Every attempt to determine the correct abstraction on paper without
actually developing a running system is doomed to failure. No one
is that smart. A framework is a resuable design, so you develop it by
looking at the things it is supposed to be a design of. The more examples
you look at, the more general your framework will be.
-- Ralph Johnson & Don Roberts, Patterns for Evolving Frameworks
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.0.3
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>.
Yes, it's fixed.
Emmanuel
Martin van den Bemt a écrit :
> Have you solved the xmlrpc problems with jpox ?
> A build from 2 days ago still had that problem..
>
> Mvgr,
> Martin
>
> Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've fixed some issues since latest RC (memory leak, performance...)
>>
>> Here is the latest RC. Please give it a try before voting.
>> http://www.codehaus.org/~evenisse/continuum/
>>
>> Let's do another 72h round of voting.
>>
>> +1/+0/-1
>>
>> Here's my +1.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Emmanuel
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.0.3
Posted by Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net>.
Have you solved the xmlrpc problems with jpox ?
A build from 2 days ago still had that problem..
Mvgr,
Martin
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've fixed some issues since latest RC (memory leak, performance...)
>
> Here is the latest RC. Please give it a try before voting.
> http://www.codehaus.org/~evenisse/continuum/
>
> Let's do another 72h round of voting.
>
> +1/+0/-1
>
> Here's my +1.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Emmanuel
>
>
>
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.0.3
Posted by Kaare Nilsen <ka...@gmail.com>.
On 14/04/06, Brett Porter <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> agreed, let's make it 120h. That's not really a reason to vote
> negatively, however.
10-4. But it was just a little negative though ;)
> - Brett
>
> On 4/14/06, Kaare Nilsen <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > -0 from me.
> > Given the history of the snapshots I would have liked to test it
> > first. But giving it is easter, and friday, I will not be able to test
> > it before tuesday, which is past the end of the vote.
> > So actually I think we should postpont the vote until tuesday morning
> > giving all of us using it at work the ability to test it at our
> > projects.
> >
> > /Kaare
> >
> > On 14/04/06, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've fixed some issues since latest RC (memory leak, performance...)
> > >
> > > Here is the latest RC. Please give it a try before voting.
> > > http://www.codehaus.org/~evenisse/continuum/
> > >
> > > Let's do another 72h round of voting.
> > >
> > > +1/+0/-1
> > >
> > > Here's my +1.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Emmanuel
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.0.3
Posted by Punkin Head <pu...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 4/14/06, Brett Porter <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> agreed, let's make it 120h. That's not really a reason to vote
> negatively, however.
>
> - Brett
>
> On 4/14/06, Kaare Nilsen <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > -0 from me.
> > Given the history of the snapshots I would have liked to test it
> > first. But giving it is easter, and friday, I will not be able to test
> > it before tuesday, which is past the end of the vote.
> > So actually I think we should postpont the vote until tuesday morning
> > giving all of us using it at work the ability to test it at our
> > projects.
> >
> > /Kaare
> >
> > On 14/04/06, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've fixed some issues since latest RC (memory leak, performance...)
> > >
> > > Here is the latest RC. Please give it a try before voting.
> > > http://www.codehaus.org/~evenisse/continuum/
> > >
> > > Let's do another 72h round of voting.
> > >
> > > +1/+0/-1
> > >
> > > Here's my +1.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Emmanuel
> > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Adam Altemus
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.0.3
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@gmail.com>.
agreed, let's make it 120h. That's not really a reason to vote
negatively, however.
- Brett
On 4/14/06, Kaare Nilsen <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> -0 from me.
> Given the history of the snapshots I would have liked to test it
> first. But giving it is easter, and friday, I will not be able to test
> it before tuesday, which is past the end of the vote.
> So actually I think we should postpont the vote until tuesday morning
> giving all of us using it at work the ability to test it at our
> projects.
>
> /Kaare
>
> On 14/04/06, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've fixed some issues since latest RC (memory leak, performance...)
> >
> > Here is the latest RC. Please give it a try before voting.
> > http://www.codehaus.org/~evenisse/continuum/
> >
> > Let's do another 72h round of voting.
> >
> > +1/+0/-1
> >
> > Here's my +1.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Emmanuel
> >
> >
>
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.0.3
Posted by Kaare Nilsen <ka...@gmail.com>.
-0 from me.
Given the history of the snapshots I would have liked to test it
first. But giving it is easter, and friday, I will not be able to test
it before tuesday, which is past the end of the vote.
So actually I think we should postpont the vote until tuesday morning
giving all of us using it at work the ability to test it at our
projects.
/Kaare
On 14/04/06, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've fixed some issues since latest RC (memory leak, performance...)
>
> Here is the latest RC. Please give it a try before voting.
> http://www.codehaus.org/~evenisse/continuum/
>
> Let's do another 72h round of voting.
>
> +1/+0/-1
>
> Here's my +1.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Emmanuel
>
>
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.0.3
Posted by Thomas Recloux <tr...@w3sys.net>.
Hi,
+1 for me.
Thanks for the speed improvements.
2006/4/14, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>:
> Hi,
>
> I've fixed some issues since latest RC (memory leak, performance...)
>
> Here is the latest RC. Please give it a try before voting.
> http://www.codehaus.org/~evenisse/continuum/
>
> Let's do another 72h round of voting.
>
> +1/+0/-1
>
> Here's my +1.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Emmanuel
>
>
--
Thomas Recloux a.k.a Karmelitre
http://karmelitre.tartachuc.org
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.0.3
Posted by Kaare Nilsen <ka...@gmail.com>.
On 20/04/06, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> My bug (641) is probably not a blocker, as it was only on improper
> shutdown and probably existed in 1.0.2.
>
> I haven't reproduced 660 - is it reliably reproduced?
>
Well it happens each time in my project.
> At this point, I would like to go ahead with the release as it is still
> significantly better than 1.0.2, and then worry about straightening out
> jpox (again) in 1.1.
>
> WDYT?
Well. I also agree that 1.0.3 is a significant improvement over 1.0.2
(which is practically not usable at all) and should be released. But I
also think that Continuum has few "flawed" releases left before no one
would try out the new bugfixes. So in the future (1.1) we should make
extra care of the quality before released.
>
> - Brett
>
> Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 20:31 +0200, Kaare Nilsen wrote:
> >> The speed improvements are impressive.. thanx for that !!
> >> I still would like to have my instance running for a couple of days to
> >> test the memoryleak in more detail, and also i have found a bug that
> >> when importing a multiproject one or more of the modules are added
> >> twice (dupplicates), and then it is not possible to delete one of them
> >> (I am going to file a jira issue tomorrow when i have the stacktrace
> >> available).
> >
> > I'm voting -0 on this release as there seems to be new issue that has
> > come up lately which I at least would like Emmanuel to take a look at
> > before continuing with the release.
> >
> > The issue is the one reported by Kaare Nilsen and Jorg (and possibly
> > related to 641[1]).
> >
> > [1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-641
> >
> > --
> > Trygve
> >
>
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.0.3
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
My bug (641) is probably not a blocker, as it was only on improper
shutdown and probably existed in 1.0.2.
I haven't reproduced 660 - is it reliably reproduced?
At this point, I would like to go ahead with the release as it is still
significantly better than 1.0.2, and then worry about straightening out
jpox (again) in 1.1.
WDYT?
- Brett
Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 20:31 +0200, Kaare Nilsen wrote:
>> The speed improvements are impressive.. thanx for that !!
>> I still would like to have my instance running for a couple of days to
>> test the memoryleak in more detail, and also i have found a bug that
>> when importing a multiproject one or more of the modules are added
>> twice (dupplicates), and then it is not possible to delete one of them
>> (I am going to file a jira issue tomorrow when i have the stacktrace
>> available).
>
> I'm voting -0 on this release as there seems to be new issue that has
> come up lately which I at least would like Emmanuel to take a look at
> before continuing with the release.
>
> The issue is the one reported by Kaare Nilsen and Jorg (and possibly
> related to 641[1]).
>
> [1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-641
>
> --
> Trygve
>
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.0.3
Posted by Kaare Nilsen <ka...@gmail.com>.
On 19/04/06, Trygve Laugstøl <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 20:31 +0200, Kaare Nilsen wrote:
> > The speed improvements are impressive.. thanx for that !!
> > I still would like to have my instance running for a couple of days to
> > test the memoryleak in more detail, and also i have found a bug that
> > when importing a multiproject one or more of the modules are added
> > twice (dupplicates), and then it is not possible to delete one of them
> > (I am going to file a jira issue tomorrow when i have the stacktrace
> > available).
>
> I'm voting -0 on this release as there seems to be new issue that has
> come up lately which I at least would like Emmanuel to take a look at
> before continuing with the release.
>
> The issue is the one reported by Kaare Nilsen and Jorg (and possibly
> related to 641[1]).
That would be http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-660
>
> [1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-641
>
> --
> Trygve
>
>
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.0.3
Posted by Trygve Laugstøl <tr...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 20:31 +0200, Kaare Nilsen wrote:
> The speed improvements are impressive.. thanx for that !!
> I still would like to have my instance running for a couple of days to
> test the memoryleak in more detail, and also i have found a bug that
> when importing a multiproject one or more of the modules are added
> twice (dupplicates), and then it is not possible to delete one of them
> (I am going to file a jira issue tomorrow when i have the stacktrace
> available).
I'm voting -0 on this release as there seems to be new issue that has
come up lately which I at least would like Emmanuel to take a look at
before continuing with the release.
The issue is the one reported by Kaare Nilsen and Jorg (and possibly
related to 641[1]).
[1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-641
--
Trygve
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.0.3
Posted by Kaare Nilsen <ka...@gmail.com>.
The speed improvements are impressive.. thanx for that !!
I still would like to have my instance running for a couple of days to
test the memoryleak in more detail, and also i have found a bug that
when importing a multiproject one or more of the modules are added
twice (dupplicates), and then it is not possible to delete one of them
(I am going to file a jira issue tomorrow when i have the stacktrace
available).
On 18/04/06, John Casey <jd...@commonjava.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've fixed some issues since latest RC (memory leak, performance...)
> >
> > Here is the latest RC. Please give it a try before voting.
> > http://www.codehaus.org/~evenisse/continuum/
> >
> > Let's do another 72h round of voting.
> >
> > +1/+0/-1
> >
> > Here's my +1.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Emmanuel
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.0.3
Posted by John Casey <jd...@commonjava.org>.
+1
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've fixed some issues since latest RC (memory leak, performance...)
>
> Here is the latest RC. Please give it a try before voting.
> http://www.codehaus.org/~evenisse/continuum/
>
> Let's do another 72h round of voting.
>
> +1/+0/-1
>
> Here's my +1.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Emmanuel
>
>
>
RE : [vote] Release Continuum 1.0.3
Posted by Olivier Lamy <ol...@accor.com>.
Very late but +1 (happy user vote).
I don't understand 72h vote, today it's one week more (maybe french
holidays ;-))
- Olivier
Note : a small trouble with using a database directory coming from an
older 1.0.3-SNAPSHOT (this cause start failed and a full database to
rebuild ;-))
Trace says :
xception : Wrong precision for column CHANGEFILE.MODEL_ENCODING : was
255 (according to the JDBC dr
iver) but should be 256 (based on the MetaData definition).
org.jpox.store.exceptions.WrongPrecisionException: Wrong precision for
column CHANGEFILE.MODEL_ENCOD
ING : was 255 (according to the JDBC driver) but should be 256 (based on
the MetaData definition).
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:emmanuel@venisse.net]
Envoyé : vendredi 14 avril 2006 15:29
À : continuum-dev@maven.apache.org; continuum-users@maven.apache.org
Objet : [vote] Release Continuum 1.0.3
Hi,
I've fixed some issues since latest RC (memory leak, performance...)
Here is the latest RC. Please give it a try before voting.
http://www.codehaus.org/~evenisse/continuum/
Let's do another 72h round of voting.
+1/+0/-1
Here's my +1.
Thanks,
Emmanuel
This e-mail, any attachments and the information contained therein ("this message") are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If you have received this message in error please send it back to the sender and delete it. Unauthorized publication, use, dissemination or disclosure of this message, either in whole or in part is strictly prohibited.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ce message électronique et tous les fichiers joints ainsi que les informations contenues dans ce message ( ci après "le message" ), sont confidentiels et destinés exclusivement à l'usage de la personne à laquelle ils sont adressés. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, merci de le renvoyer à son émetteur et de le détruire. Toutes diffusion, publication, totale ou partielle ou divulgation sous quelque forme que se soit non expressément autorisées de ce message, sont interdites.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------