You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by dad <gn...@gmail.com> on 2014/09/22 15:35:54 UTC
geronimo websocket
Hi,
We are doing osgi development on geronimo 3.01 currently and we need to be
able to use websocket. We understand the current tomcat bundled with
geronimo does not have websocket implementation. So we'd like to know what
the plans are to make websocket available in geronimo.
If it's not any time soon, could you please advise what alternatives we can
consider.
Many thanks
Re: geronimo websocket
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
I don't think anyone is actively working on the geronimo server at the moment (happy to be proven wrong….). Options I can think of are:
- integrate a more recent tomcat yourself, hopefully providing patches.
- use karaf with jetty
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 22, 2014, at 6:35 AM, dad <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are doing osgi development on geronimo 3.01 currently and we need to be able to use websocket. We understand the current tomcat bundled with geronimo does not have websocket implementation. So we'd like to know what the plans are to make websocket available in geronimo.
>
> If it's not any time soon, could you please advise what alternatives we can consider.
>
> Many thanks
>
Re: geronimo websocket
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
That would certainly be the place to start. I don't know anything about web sockets in tomcat, do you have to configure tomcat to turn on the support? Geronimo rewrote the tomcat configuration mechanism so most likely the method of configuration would have to be added to the geronimo config code.
thanks
david jencks
On Oct 29, 2014, at 1:48 AM, Zhi Xie <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi,David. Tomcat support WebSocket from 7.0.27. The Tomcat in Geronimo 3.0.1 is 7.0.39. So it means geronimo can support WebSocket. Just there are some work in geronimo side to do, such as geronimo-tomcat7 module. Right?
>
> 2014-09-23 19:18 GMT+08:00 dad <gn...@gmail.com>:
> Thanks David,
>
> Can you please provide some guide on how to go about doing the integration? Excuse my apparent ignorance, but this area is completely new to me.
>
> 1. where/which/what are the integration points for tomcat?
> E.g any initialization/routines/library calls aside the vanila tomcat itself?
> 2. Gotchas to be aware of
> 3. Tips to ensure standards compliance
>
> Many thanks
>
>
>
> From David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>
> Subject Re: geronimo websocket
> Date Mon, 22 Sep 2014 17:54:15 GMT
> I don't think anyone is actively working on the geronimo server at the moment (happy to be
> proven wrong….). Options I can think of are:
>
> - integrate a more recent tomcat yourself, hopefully providing patches.
>
> - use karaf with jetty
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 2:35 PM, dad <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are doing osgi development on geronimo 3.01 currently and we need to be able to use websocket. We understand the current tomcat bundled with geronimo does not have websocket implementation. So we'd like to know what the plans are to make websocket available in geronimo.
>
> If it's not any time soon, could you please advise what alternatives we can consider.
>
> Many thanks
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Gary
Re: geronimo websocket
Posted by Zhi Xie <da...@gmail.com>.
hi,David. Tomcat support WebSocket from 7.0.27. The Tomcat in Geronimo
3.0.1 is 7.0.39. So it means geronimo can support WebSocket. Just there are
some work in geronimo side to do, such as geronimo-tomcat7 module. Right?
2014-09-23 19:18 GMT+08:00 dad <gn...@gmail.com>:
> Thanks David,
>
> Can you please provide some guide on how to go about doing the
> integration? Excuse my apparent ignorance, but this area is completely new
> to me.
>
> 1. where/which/what are the integration points for tomcat?
> E.g any initialization/routines/library calls aside the vanila tomcat
> itself?
> 2. Gotchas to be aware of
> 3. Tips to ensure standards compliance
>
> Many thanks
>
>
>
> From David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>
> Subject Re: geronimo websocket
> Date Mon, 22 Sep 2014 17:54:15 GMT
> I don't think anyone is actively working on the geronimo server at the
> moment (happy to be
> proven wrong….). Options I can think of are:
>
> - integrate a more recent tomcat yourself, hopefully providing patches.
>
> - use karaf with jetty
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 2:35 PM, dad <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are doing osgi development on geronimo 3.01 currently and we need to
>> be able to use websocket. We understand the current tomcat bundled with
>> geronimo does not have websocket implementation. So we'd like to know what
>> the plans are to make websocket available in geronimo.
>>
>> If it's not any time soon, could you please advise what alternatives we
>> can consider.
>>
>> Many thanks
>>
>>
>
--
Best Regards
Gary
Re: geronimo websocket
Posted by dad <gn...@gmail.com>.
Thanks David,
Can you please provide some guide on how to go about doing the integration?
Excuse my apparent ignorance, but this area is completely new to me.
1. where/which/what are the integration points for tomcat?
E.g any initialization/routines/library calls aside the vanila tomcat
itself?
2. Gotchas to be aware of
3. Tips to ensure standards compliance
Many thanks
>From David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: geronimo websocket
Date Mon, 22 Sep 2014 17:54:15 GMT
I don't think anyone is actively working on the geronimo server at the
moment (happy to be
proven wrong….). Options I can think of are:
- integrate a more recent tomcat yourself, hopefully providing patches.
- use karaf with jetty
thanks
david jencks
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 2:35 PM, dad <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are doing osgi development on geronimo 3.01 currently and we need to be
> able to use websocket. We understand the current tomcat bundled with
> geronimo does not have websocket implementation. So we'd like to know what
> the plans are to make websocket available in geronimo.
>
> If it's not any time soon, could you please advise what alternatives we
> can consider.
>
> Many thanks
>
>