You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@hive.apache.org by John Sichi <js...@fb.com> on 2011/10/20 23:00:03 UTC
testing out Phabricator for code review
Hey all,
Earlier this year, Facebook released a bunch of its code browsing/review tools as a new (and independent) open source project called Phabricator:
http://phabricator.org/
We're currently experimenting with using it for improving the developer experience when contributing and reviewing Hive and HBase patches. (Also for eliminating committer confusion from different patch versions submitted to Review Board and JIRA, something which has bitten us a few times already.)
You may notice some of this activity showing up in JIRA, e.g.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2515
I'll be sending out a lot more info once we've finished some of the setup and validation, but I just wanted to send out a heads-up for those who are already familiar with using the existing Review Board setup. Once validation is done, we'll publish instructions so that everyone can test it out for themselves as a potential alternative to Review Board.
JVS
Re: testing out Phabricator for code review
Posted by John Sichi <js...@fb.com>.
If you want, you'll be able to use the instance we're setting up at reviews.facebook.net; it supports authentication via either an existing Github or Facebook account.
Marek Sapota is working on making the JIRA integration reusable across projects; I'll put you in touch with him for getting HCatalog added once we're a little further along.
JVS
On Oct 20, 2011, at 3:01 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan wrote:
> Hey John,
>
> Thanks for the heads up. I am interested in phabricator especially since I am thinking of setting up some review tool for HCatalog too. I have couple of questions:
> a) I can configure RB to use apache email address (or any email for that matter). Is that possible with Phabricator. Looks like I need to have an account in Phabricator ?
> b) If I need to set it up for HCatalog, how do I go about doing it?
>
> Thanks,
> Ashutosh
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 14:00, John Sichi <js...@fb.com> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Earlier this year, Facebook released a bunch of its code browsing/review tools as a new (and independent) open source project called Phabricator:
>
> http://phabricator.org/
>
> We're currently experimenting with using it for improving the developer experience when contributing and reviewing Hive and HBase patches. (Also for eliminating committer confusion from different patch versions submitted to Review Board and JIRA, something which has bitten us a few times already.)
>
> You may notice some of this activity showing up in JIRA, e.g.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2515
>
> I'll be sending out a lot more info once we've finished some of the setup and validation, but I just wanted to send out a heads-up for those who are already familiar with using the existing Review Board setup. Once validation is done, we'll publish instructions so that everyone can test it out for themselves as a potential alternative to Review Board.
>
> JVS
>
>
Re: testing out Phabricator for code review
Posted by John Sichi <js...@fb.com>.
If you want, you'll be able to use the instance we're setting up at reviews.facebook.net; it supports authentication via either an existing Github or Facebook account.
Marek Sapota is working on making the JIRA integration reusable across projects; I'll put you in touch with him for getting HCatalog added once we're a little further along.
JVS
On Oct 20, 2011, at 3:01 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan wrote:
> Hey John,
>
> Thanks for the heads up. I am interested in phabricator especially since I am thinking of setting up some review tool for HCatalog too. I have couple of questions:
> a) I can configure RB to use apache email address (or any email for that matter). Is that possible with Phabricator. Looks like I need to have an account in Phabricator ?
> b) If I need to set it up for HCatalog, how do I go about doing it?
>
> Thanks,
> Ashutosh
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 14:00, John Sichi <js...@fb.com> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Earlier this year, Facebook released a bunch of its code browsing/review tools as a new (and independent) open source project called Phabricator:
>
> http://phabricator.org/
>
> We're currently experimenting with using it for improving the developer experience when contributing and reviewing Hive and HBase patches. (Also for eliminating committer confusion from different patch versions submitted to Review Board and JIRA, something which has bitten us a few times already.)
>
> You may notice some of this activity showing up in JIRA, e.g.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2515
>
> I'll be sending out a lot more info once we've finished some of the setup and validation, but I just wanted to send out a heads-up for those who are already familiar with using the existing Review Board setup. Once validation is done, we'll publish instructions so that everyone can test it out for themselves as a potential alternative to Review Board.
>
> JVS
>
>
Re: testing out Phabricator for code review
Posted by Ashutosh Chauhan <ha...@apache.org>.
Hey John,
Thanks for the heads up. I am interested in phabricator especially since I
am thinking of setting up some review tool for HCatalog too. I have couple
of questions:
a) I can configure RB to use apache email address (or any email for that
matter). Is that possible with Phabricator. Looks like I need to have an
account in Phabricator ?
b) If I need to set it up for HCatalog, how do I go about doing it?
Thanks,
Ashutosh
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 14:00, John Sichi <js...@fb.com> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Earlier this year, Facebook released a bunch of its code browsing/review
> tools as a new (and independent) open source project called Phabricator:
>
> http://phabricator.org/
>
> We're currently experimenting with using it for improving the developer
> experience when contributing and reviewing Hive and HBase patches. (Also
> for eliminating committer confusion from different patch versions submitted
> to Review Board and JIRA, something which has bitten us a few times
> already.)
>
> You may notice some of this activity showing up in JIRA, e.g.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2515
>
> I'll be sending out a lot more info once we've finished some of the setup
> and validation, but I just wanted to send out a heads-up for those who are
> already familiar with using the existing Review Board setup. Once
> validation is done, we'll publish instructions so that everyone can test it
> out for themselves as a potential alternative to Review Board.
>
> JVS
>
>
Re: testing out Phabricator for code review
Posted by Ashutosh Chauhan <ha...@apache.org>.
Hey John,
Thanks for the heads up. I am interested in phabricator especially since I
am thinking of setting up some review tool for HCatalog too. I have couple
of questions:
a) I can configure RB to use apache email address (or any email for that
matter). Is that possible with Phabricator. Looks like I need to have an
account in Phabricator ?
b) If I need to set it up for HCatalog, how do I go about doing it?
Thanks,
Ashutosh
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 14:00, John Sichi <js...@fb.com> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Earlier this year, Facebook released a bunch of its code browsing/review
> tools as a new (and independent) open source project called Phabricator:
>
> http://phabricator.org/
>
> We're currently experimenting with using it for improving the developer
> experience when contributing and reviewing Hive and HBase patches. (Also
> for eliminating committer confusion from different patch versions submitted
> to Review Board and JIRA, something which has bitten us a few times
> already.)
>
> You may notice some of this activity showing up in JIRA, e.g.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2515
>
> I'll be sending out a lot more info once we've finished some of the setup
> and validation, but I just wanted to send out a heads-up for those who are
> already familiar with using the existing Review Board setup. Once
> validation is done, we'll publish instructions so that everyone can test it
> out for themselves as a potential alternative to Review Board.
>
> JVS
>
>
Re: testing out Phabricator for code review
Posted by John Sichi <js...@fb.com>.
Marek added support for svn, so that is working now too...give it a try! Instructions updated at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/PhabricatorCodeReview
JVS
On Oct 26, 2011, at 10:49 PM, wrote:
> I've put up instructions for how anyone can start using Phabricator for code review:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/PhabricatorCodeReview
>
> We've tested out the git workflows; still working on svn.
>
> Feedback on how it works for you, anything you noticed missing, etc is appreciated.
>
> JVS
>
> On Oct 20, 2011, at 2:00 PM, wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> Earlier this year, Facebook released a bunch of its code browsing/review tools as a new (and independent) open source project called Phabricator:
>>
>> http://phabricator.org/
>>
>> We're currently experimenting with using it for improving the developer experience when contributing and reviewing Hive and HBase patches. (Also for eliminating committer confusion from different patch versions submitted to Review Board and JIRA, something which has bitten us a few times already.)
>>
>> You may notice some of this activity showing up in JIRA, e.g.
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2515
>>
>> I'll be sending out a lot more info once we've finished some of the setup and validation, but I just wanted to send out a heads-up for those who are already familiar with using the existing Review Board setup. Once validation is done, we'll publish instructions so that everyone can test it out for themselves as a potential alternative to Review Board.
>>
>> JVS
>>
>
Re: testing out Phabricator for code review
Posted by John Sichi <js...@fb.com>.
Marek added support for svn, so that is working now too...give it a try! Instructions updated at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/PhabricatorCodeReview
JVS
On Oct 26, 2011, at 10:49 PM, wrote:
> I've put up instructions for how anyone can start using Phabricator for code review:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/PhabricatorCodeReview
>
> We've tested out the git workflows; still working on svn.
>
> Feedback on how it works for you, anything you noticed missing, etc is appreciated.
>
> JVS
>
> On Oct 20, 2011, at 2:00 PM, wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> Earlier this year, Facebook released a bunch of its code browsing/review tools as a new (and independent) open source project called Phabricator:
>>
>> http://phabricator.org/
>>
>> We're currently experimenting with using it for improving the developer experience when contributing and reviewing Hive and HBase patches. (Also for eliminating committer confusion from different patch versions submitted to Review Board and JIRA, something which has bitten us a few times already.)
>>
>> You may notice some of this activity showing up in JIRA, e.g.
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2515
>>
>> I'll be sending out a lot more info once we've finished some of the setup and validation, but I just wanted to send out a heads-up for those who are already familiar with using the existing Review Board setup. Once validation is done, we'll publish instructions so that everyone can test it out for themselves as a potential alternative to Review Board.
>>
>> JVS
>>
>
Re: testing out Phabricator for code review
Posted by John Sichi <js...@fb.com>.
I've put up instructions for how anyone can start using Phabricator for code review:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/PhabricatorCodeReview
We've tested out the git workflows; still working on svn.
Feedback on how it works for you, anything you noticed missing, etc is appreciated.
JVS
On Oct 20, 2011, at 2:00 PM, wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Earlier this year, Facebook released a bunch of its code browsing/review tools as a new (and independent) open source project called Phabricator:
>
> http://phabricator.org/
>
> We're currently experimenting with using it for improving the developer experience when contributing and reviewing Hive and HBase patches. (Also for eliminating committer confusion from different patch versions submitted to Review Board and JIRA, something which has bitten us a few times already.)
>
> You may notice some of this activity showing up in JIRA, e.g.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2515
>
> I'll be sending out a lot more info once we've finished some of the setup and validation, but I just wanted to send out a heads-up for those who are already familiar with using the existing Review Board setup. Once validation is done, we'll publish instructions so that everyone can test it out for themselves as a potential alternative to Review Board.
>
> JVS
>
Re: testing out Phabricator for code review
Posted by John Sichi <js...@fb.com>.
I've put up instructions for how anyone can start using Phabricator for code review:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/PhabricatorCodeReview
We've tested out the git workflows; still working on svn.
Feedback on how it works for you, anything you noticed missing, etc is appreciated.
JVS
On Oct 20, 2011, at 2:00 PM, wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Earlier this year, Facebook released a bunch of its code browsing/review tools as a new (and independent) open source project called Phabricator:
>
> http://phabricator.org/
>
> We're currently experimenting with using it for improving the developer experience when contributing and reviewing Hive and HBase patches. (Also for eliminating committer confusion from different patch versions submitted to Review Board and JIRA, something which has bitten us a few times already.)
>
> You may notice some of this activity showing up in JIRA, e.g.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2515
>
> I'll be sending out a lot more info once we've finished some of the setup and validation, but I just wanted to send out a heads-up for those who are already familiar with using the existing Review Board setup. Once validation is done, we'll publish instructions so that everyone can test it out for themselves as a potential alternative to Review Board.
>
> JVS
>