You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> on 2009/07/25 06:49:44 UTC
[VOTE] jaxb 2.1 spec jar 1.0
Hi,
Scout is upgrading their maven build and wants to use our spec jars,
and we need to get several released for 2.2. The one scout needs now
is jaxb 2.1.
We've run the jaxb 2.1 tck on it and it works.
This is the first release of this spec jar from geronimo.
I'm having a bit of trouble promoting the uploads in apache nexus so
for now I put them on people.apache.org: when I figure out how to
promote them I'll post an updated location.
Staging site for artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging/
Staging site for stie:
http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/maven/specs/geronimo-jaxb_2.1_spec/1.0/
Voting will remain open for 72 hours.
many thanks
david jencks
Re: [VOTE] jaxb 2.1 spec jar 1.0
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
+1
Donald
David Jencks wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Scout is upgrading their maven build and wants to use our spec jars, and
> we need to get several released for 2.2. The one scout needs now is
> jaxb 2.1.
>
> We've run the jaxb 2.1 tck on it and it works.
>
> This is the first release of this spec jar from geronimo.
>
> I'm having a bit of trouble promoting the uploads in apache nexus so for
> now I put them on people.apache.org: when I figure out how to promote
> them I'll post an updated location.
>
> Staging site for artifacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging/
>
> Staging site for stie:
> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/maven/specs/geronimo-jaxb_2.1_spec/1.0/
>
>
>
> Voting will remain open for 72 hours.
>
> many thanks
> david jencks
>
>
Re: [VOTE] jaxb 2.1 spec jar 1.0
Posted by Jarek Gawor <jg...@gmail.com>.
+1
Jarek
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:49 AM, David Jencks<da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Scout is upgrading their maven build and wants to use our spec jars, and we
> need to get several released for 2.2. The one scout needs now is jaxb 2.1.
>
> We've run the jaxb 2.1 tck on it and it works.
>
> This is the first release of this spec jar from geronimo.
>
> I'm having a bit of trouble promoting the uploads in apache nexus so for now
> I put them on people.apache.org: when I figure out how to promote them I'll
> post an updated location.
>
> Staging site for artifacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging/
>
> Staging site for stie:
> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/maven/specs/geronimo-jaxb_2.1_spec/1.0/
>
>
> Voting will remain open for 72 hours.
>
> many thanks
> david jencks
>
>
Re: [VOTE] jaxb 2.1 spec jar 1.0
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
This morning I was able to get into nexus and close the staging repo
so the artifacts are visible....
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jaxb_2.1_spec/1.0/
thanks
david jencks
On Jul 24, 2009, at 9:49 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Scout is upgrading their maven build and wants to use our spec jars,
> and we need to get several released for 2.2. The one scout needs
> now is jaxb 2.1.
>
> We've run the jaxb 2.1 tck on it and it works.
>
> This is the first release of this spec jar from geronimo.
>
> I'm having a bit of trouble promoting the uploads in apache nexus so
> for now I put them on people.apache.org: when I figure out how to
> promote them I'll post an updated location.
>
> Staging site for artifacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging/
>
> Staging site for stie:
> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/maven/specs/geronimo-jaxb_2.1_spec/1.0/
>
>
> Voting will remain open for 72 hours.
>
> many thanks
> david jencks
>
CANCELLED [VOTE] jaxb 2.1 spec jar 1.0
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
The scout folks are OK with concurrent votes. I've fixed the legal
files, re-staged the artifacts and will call a new vote.
thanks
david jencks
On Jul 27, 2009, at 11:01 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Jul 27, 2009, at 1:13 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 27, 2009, at 5:18 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 25, 2009, at 12:49 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Scout is upgrading their maven build and wants to use our spec
>>>> jars, and we need to get several released for 2.2. The one scout
>>>> needs now is jaxb 2.1.
>>>>
>>>> We've run the jaxb 2.1 tck on it and it works.
>>>>
>>>> This is the first release of this spec jar from geronimo.
>>>>
>>>> I'm having a bit of trouble promoting the uploads in apache nexus
>>>> so for now I put them on people.apache.org: when I figure out how
>>>> to promote them I'll post an updated location.
>>>>
>>>> Staging site for artifacts:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging/
>>>>
>>>> Staging site for stie:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/maven/specs/geronimo-jaxb_2.1_spec/1.0/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Voting will remain open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>>
>>> Source and signatures look good.
>>>
>>> The LICENSE and NOTICE file in the source and binary are
>>> different. The source versions contains license and notice
>>> information that is not contained in the binary version. I don't
>>> see how that can be correct. One of the pairs must be wrong. Until
>>> this is resolved, I'm -1.
>>
>> I looked at svn history. This spec came from servicemix where it
>> was written entirely by gnodet. The servicemix svn contains the
>> smaller generic LICENSE and NOTICE files. Someone added the
>> expanded ones to all our spec projects at some point.
>>
>> So my conclusion is that the plain vanilla LICENSE and NOTICE files
>> are more correct for this spec project. I'll update them in trunk.
>>
>> Now, Apache has a long and unfortunate tradition of including extra
>> crud in LICENSE and NOTICE files. Much as I don't like
>> participating in this tradition I'm not sure I think this one is
>> worth rerolling the release for.
>>
>> I'll ask the scout folks if they can run their release vote
>> concurrently with this vote -- if they can I'll re-roll this one.
>
> Thanks a bunch for digging through svn history. That makes sense.
> I'd prefer to see updated license/notice files. If only license/
> notice are being updated, I'm not sure a new, full 72-hour vote
> would be required.
>
> --kevan
Re: [VOTE] jaxb 2.1 spec jar 1.0
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Jul 27, 2009, at 1:13 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Jul 27, 2009, at 5:18 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 25, 2009, at 12:49 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Scout is upgrading their maven build and wants to use our spec
>>> jars, and we need to get several released for 2.2. The one scout
>>> needs now is jaxb 2.1.
>>>
>>> We've run the jaxb 2.1 tck on it and it works.
>>>
>>> This is the first release of this spec jar from geronimo.
>>>
>>> I'm having a bit of trouble promoting the uploads in apache nexus
>>> so for now I put them on people.apache.org: when I figure out how
>>> to promote them I'll post an updated location.
>>>
>>> Staging site for artifacts:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging/
>>>
>>> Staging site for stie:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/maven/specs/geronimo-jaxb_2.1_spec/1.0/
>>>
>>>
>>> Voting will remain open for 72 hours.
>>
>>
>> Source and signatures look good.
>>
>> The LICENSE and NOTICE file in the source and binary are different.
>> The source versions contains license and notice information that is
>> not contained in the binary version. I don't see how that can be
>> correct. One of the pairs must be wrong. Until this is resolved,
>> I'm -1.
>
> I looked at svn history. This spec came from servicemix where it
> was written entirely by gnodet. The servicemix svn contains the
> smaller generic LICENSE and NOTICE files. Someone added the
> expanded ones to all our spec projects at some point.
>
> So my conclusion is that the plain vanilla LICENSE and NOTICE files
> are more correct for this spec project. I'll update them in trunk.
>
> Now, Apache has a long and unfortunate tradition of including extra
> crud in LICENSE and NOTICE files. Much as I don't like
> participating in this tradition I'm not sure I think this one is
> worth rerolling the release for.
>
> I'll ask the scout folks if they can run their release vote
> concurrently with this vote -- if they can I'll re-roll this one.
Thanks a bunch for digging through svn history. That makes sense. I'd
prefer to see updated license/notice files. If only license/notice are
being updated, I'm not sure a new, full 72-hour vote would be required.
--kevan
Re: [VOTE] jaxb 2.1 spec jar 1.0
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
On Jul 27, 2009, at 5:18 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Jul 25, 2009, at 12:49 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Scout is upgrading their maven build and wants to use our spec
>> jars, and we need to get several released for 2.2. The one scout
>> needs now is jaxb 2.1.
>>
>> We've run the jaxb 2.1 tck on it and it works.
>>
>> This is the first release of this spec jar from geronimo.
>>
>> I'm having a bit of trouble promoting the uploads in apache nexus
>> so for now I put them on people.apache.org: when I figure out how
>> to promote them I'll post an updated location.
>>
>> Staging site for artifacts:
>> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging/
>>
>> Staging site for stie:
>> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/maven/specs/geronimo-jaxb_2.1_spec/1.0/
>>
>>
>> Voting will remain open for 72 hours.
>
>
> Source and signatures look good.
>
> The LICENSE and NOTICE file in the source and binary are different.
> The source versions contains license and notice information that is
> not contained in the binary version. I don't see how that can be
> correct. One of the pairs must be wrong. Until this is resolved, I'm
> -1.
I looked at svn history. This spec came from servicemix where it was
written entirely by gnodet. The servicemix svn contains the smaller
generic LICENSE and NOTICE files. Someone added the expanded ones to
all our spec projects at some point.
So my conclusion is that the plain vanilla LICENSE and NOTICE files
are more correct for this spec project. I'll update them in trunk.
Now, Apache has a long and unfortunate tradition of including extra
crud in LICENSE and NOTICE files. Much as I don't like participating
in this tradition I'm not sure I think this one is worth rerolling the
release for.
I'll ask the scout folks if they can run their release vote
concurrently with this vote -- if they can I'll re-roll this one.
thanks
david jencks
>
> --kevan
Re: [VOTE] jaxb 2.1 spec jar 1.0
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Jul 25, 2009, at 12:49 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Scout is upgrading their maven build and wants to use our spec jars,
> and we need to get several released for 2.2. The one scout needs
> now is jaxb 2.1.
>
> We've run the jaxb 2.1 tck on it and it works.
>
> This is the first release of this spec jar from geronimo.
>
> I'm having a bit of trouble promoting the uploads in apache nexus so
> for now I put them on people.apache.org: when I figure out how to
> promote them I'll post an updated location.
>
> Staging site for artifacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging/
>
> Staging site for stie:
> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/maven/specs/geronimo-jaxb_2.1_spec/1.0/
>
>
> Voting will remain open for 72 hours.
Source and signatures look good.
The LICENSE and NOTICE file in the source and binary are different.
The source versions contains license and notice information that is
not contained in the binary version. I don't see how that can be
correct. One of the pairs must be wrong. Until this is resolved, I'm -1.
--kevan
Re: [VOTE] jaxb 2.1 spec jar 1.0
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me.
-- dims
On 07/25/2009 01:55 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> Here's my +1
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Jul 24, 2009, at 9:49 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Scout is upgrading their maven build and wants to use our spec jars,
>> and we need to get several released for 2.2. The one scout needs now
>> is jaxb 2.1.
>>
>> We've run the jaxb 2.1 tck on it and it works.
>>
>> This is the first release of this spec jar from geronimo.
>>
>> I'm having a bit of trouble promoting the uploads in apache nexus so
>> for now I put them on people.apache.org: when I figure out how to
>> promote them I'll post an updated location.
>>
>> Staging site for artifacts:
>> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging/
>>
>> Staging site for stie:
>> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/maven/specs/geronimo-jaxb_2.1_spec/1.0/
>>
>>
>>
>> Voting will remain open for 72 hours.
>>
>> many thanks
>> david jencks
>>
Re: [VOTE] jaxb 2.1 spec jar 1.0
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
Here's my +1
thanks
david jencks
On Jul 24, 2009, at 9:49 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Scout is upgrading their maven build and wants to use our spec jars,
> and we need to get several released for 2.2. The one scout needs
> now is jaxb 2.1.
>
> We've run the jaxb 2.1 tck on it and it works.
>
> This is the first release of this spec jar from geronimo.
>
> I'm having a bit of trouble promoting the uploads in apache nexus so
> for now I put them on people.apache.org: when I figure out how to
> promote them I'll post an updated location.
>
> Staging site for artifacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging/
>
> Staging site for stie:
> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/maven/specs/geronimo-jaxb_2.1_spec/1.0/
>
>
> Voting will remain open for 72 hours.
>
> many thanks
> david jencks
>