You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to c-dev@xerces.apache.org by Martin Vallée <ma...@rvbs.com> on 2001/02/23 23:21:50 UTC
Look this !!!
Hello gang,
very good work !!
i just want to know if we can use xerces system without
the xercesXXX.dll
can i use only the lib in my project ???
yes i know my executable will be huge but i can't use
dll.
if not tell me why please
Thanks for your help
Martin
Re: Searching old threads
Posted by Bob Kline <bk...@rksystems.com>.
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, Charlie Hart wrote:
> Bob Kline wrote:
>
> > By the way, use of subject lines which reflect the general topic of a
> > thread you are creating helps other list members find the answers when
> > they have questions which have come up before.
>
> Is there a way to search old threads? I didn't see it in the FAQs.
> thanks...charlie
Unfortunately not. The best you can get is a list of messages showing
the subject line and author (and even that's got a delay of a month or
so). Under these conditions, it's starkly apparent how much more useful
subject lines like "Problems linking sample code on Solaris" or "SAX
'characters' method and ignoring whitespace" are than "HELP!" or "Read
this!".
--
Bob Kline
mailto:bkline@rksystems.com
http://www.rksystems.com
Searching old threads
Posted by Charlie Hart <ch...@nc.rr.com>.
Is there a way to search old threads? I didn't see it in the FAQs.
thanks...charlie
Bob Kline wrote:
>
> By the way, use of subject lines which reflect the general topic of a
> thread you are creating helps other list members find the answers when
> they have questions which have come up before.
>
> --
> Bob Kline
> mailto:bkline@rksystems.com
> http://www.rksystems.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-help@xml.apache.org
Re: PlatformUtils::Initialize()
Posted by Joe Polastre <jp...@apache.org>.
It is reference counted now, this is something I did quite a few months ago
for people that wanted to call init/term multiple times. As far as I know,
term() still doesn't really do very much at all. The ref count is
definitely a very weak reference count though. Like simon said, the best
bet is to do it once in dllmain.
-Joe
www.polastre.com
At 09:44 AM 2/25/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>i believe that internally now Init / Term is ref counted. However if
>you're doing a win32 dll, by far the easiest approach is to just call
>Init / Term once in dllmain.
>
>Cheers
>Simon
RE: PlatformUtils::Initialize()
Posted by Clint Phillips <cp...@apriva.com>.
Come to think of it, PlatformUtils::Initialize doesn't call LoadLibrary,
right? That is where WSAStartup problems stem from(calling LoadLibrary in
DllMain).
-Clint
-----Original Message-----
From: Clint Phillips [mailto:cphillips@apriva.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 10:56 AM
To: xerces-c-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: RE: PlatformUtils::Initialize()
Thanks,
I think I was blocking that option out as I can't run WSAStartup() in
DllMain. Completely different I know, thanks for clearing my head out.
Clint
-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Fell [mailto:xml@zaks.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 10:45 AM
To: xerces-c-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: PlatformUtils::Initialize()
i believe that internally now Init / Term is ref counted. However if
you're doing a win32 dll, by far the easiest approach is to just call
Init / Term once in dllmain.
Cheers
Simon
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001 10:35:48 -0700, in xml you wrote:
>Hi all,
> If I'm understanding correctly PlatformUtils::Initialize() can only be
>called once per process, and doing so more than once will cause issues. I'm
>using Xercies in a multithreaded dll and this is a little bit of a pain.
I'm
>planning on using a flag with one of the interlocked functions(Win32) if
>this is truely the case. PlatformUtils is required, right?(I couldn't get
>things working w/o it.)
>
>Thanks, Clint
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-help@xml.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-help@xml.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-help@xml.apache.org
RE: PlatformUtils::Initialize()
Posted by Clint Phillips <cp...@apriva.com>.
Thanks,
I think I was blocking that option out as I can't run WSAStartup() in
DllMain. Completely different I know, thanks for clearing my head out.
Clint
-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Fell [mailto:xml@zaks.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 10:45 AM
To: xerces-c-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: PlatformUtils::Initialize()
i believe that internally now Init / Term is ref counted. However if
you're doing a win32 dll, by far the easiest approach is to just call
Init / Term once in dllmain.
Cheers
Simon
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001 10:35:48 -0700, in xml you wrote:
>Hi all,
> If I'm understanding correctly PlatformUtils::Initialize() can only be
>called once per process, and doing so more than once will cause issues. I'm
>using Xercies in a multithreaded dll and this is a little bit of a pain.
I'm
>planning on using a flag with one of the interlocked functions(Win32) if
>this is truely the case. PlatformUtils is required, right?(I couldn't get
>things working w/o it.)
>
>Thanks, Clint
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-help@xml.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-help@xml.apache.org
Re: PlatformUtils::Initialize()
Posted by Simon Fell <xm...@zaks.demon.co.uk>.
i believe that internally now Init / Term is ref counted. However if
you're doing a win32 dll, by far the easiest approach is to just call
Init / Term once in dllmain.
Cheers
Simon
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001 10:35:48 -0700, in xml you wrote:
>Hi all,
> If I'm understanding correctly PlatformUtils::Initialize() can only be
>called once per process, and doing so more than once will cause issues. I'm
>using Xercies in a multithreaded dll and this is a little bit of a pain. I'm
>planning on using a flag with one of the interlocked functions(Win32) if
>this is truely the case. PlatformUtils is required, right?(I couldn't get
>things working w/o it.)
>
>Thanks, Clint
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-help@xml.apache.org
PlatformUtils::Initialize()
Posted by Clint Phillips <cp...@apriva.com>.
Hi all,
If I'm understanding correctly PlatformUtils::Initialize() can only be
called once per process, and doing so more than once will cause issues. I'm
using Xercies in a multithreaded dll and this is a little bit of a pain. I'm
planning on using a flag with one of the interlocked functions(Win32) if
this is truely the case. PlatformUtils is required, right?(I couldn't get
things working w/o it.)
Thanks, Clint
RE: Static library [was: Look this !!!]
Posted by Peter Murphy <pe...@fast.fujitsu.com.au>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Kline [mailto:bkline@rksystems.com]
> Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2001 11:48 PM
> To: xerces-c-dev@xml.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Static library [was: Look this !!!]
>
>
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, [ISO-8859-1] Martin Vallée wrote:
>
> > i just want to know if we can use xerces system without the
> > xercesXXX.dll
> >
> > can i use only the lib in my project ??? yes i know my executable
> > will be huge but i can't use dll.
> >
> > if not tell me why please
>
> No problem. Just create makefiles which will build static libraries
> instead of dynamic and link them into your program.
>
Martin may need to tinker around with the following lines as well if he
wants to do a static build AND load messages:
...\c\src\util\Compilers\VCPPDefs.hpp(lines 149-153):
-------------------------------------------------------
#if defined(XERCES_DEBUG)
const char* const Xerces_DLLName = "xerces-c_" Xerces_DLLVersionStr "D";
#else
const char* const Xerces_DLLName = "xerces-c_" Xerces_DLLVersionStr;
#endif
-------------------------------------------------------
...\c\src\util\MsgLoaders\Win32\Win32MsgLoader.cpp(line 77-93):
-------------------------------------------------------
Win32MsgLoader::Win32MsgLoader(const XMLCh* const msgDomain) :
fDomainOfs(0)
, fModHandle(0)
, fMsgDomain(0)
{
// Try to get the module handle
fModHandle = ::GetModuleHandleA(Xerces_DLLName);
if (!fModHandle)
{
//
// If we didn't find it, its probably because its a development
// build which is built as separate DLLs, so lets look for the DLL
// that we are part of.
//
static const char* const privDLLName = "IXUTIL";
fModHandle = ::GetModuleHandleA(privDLLName);
-------------------------------------------------------
I think both GetModuleHandleA calls would fail, as they stand. I having
tried it, but would changing the privDLLName variable to the name of your
executable do the trick?
Regards,
Peter.
Re: Static library [was: Look this !!!]
Posted by Bob Kline <bk...@rksystems.com>.
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, [ISO-8859-1] Martin Vall�e wrote:
> i just want to know if we can use xerces system without the
> xercesXXX.dll
>
> can i use only the lib in my project ??? yes i know my executable
> will be huge but i can't use dll.
>
> if not tell me why please
No problem. Just create makefiles which will build static libraries
instead of dynamic and link them into your program.
By the way, use of subject lines which reflect the general topic of a
thread you are creating helps other list members find the answers when
they have questions which have come up before.
--
Bob Kline
mailto:bkline@rksystems.com
http://www.rksystems.com
XML to C++ data bindings and marshalling framework
Posted by Aleksandar Milanovic <am...@galdosinc.com>.
Hi All,
Sorry for this unrelated question, but I need some info that only C++ XML
developers may have so this mailing list seems to be the best place to ask.
I need a C++ implementation of XML to C++ data bindings and marshalling
framework, something analogous to JAXB or Castor for Java.
I am afraid this doesn't exist. Am I right?
thx
Alex