[jira] Updated: (AMQ-1886) Transactions used in a JDBC store WITHOUT a journal will not commit the UOW in an atomic operation

["Gary Tully (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Gary Tully updated AMQ-1886:
----------------------------

    Fix Version/s: 5.3.0
                       (was: 5.2.0)

> Transactions used in a JDBC store WITHOUT a journal will not commit the UOW in an atomic operation
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-1886
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1886
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 5.1.0
>            Reporter: Hiram Chirino
>            Assignee: Hiram Chirino
>             Fix For: 5.3.0
>
>
> The JDBC store's primary use case has always been to be used in conjunction with the journal.  When the journal is in place it recovers any partially committed transaction and makes the JDBC store consistent.  When the journal is not used, for example when you are setting up an HA solution with an HA JDBC database, then it has been noticed that on a DB failure you may get partial commits of JMS transactions.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.