You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Jerry He (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/07/10 04:17:04 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-11488) cancelTasks in SubprocedurePool can hang during task error

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14057046#comment-14057046 ] 

Jerry He commented on HBASE-11488:
----------------------------------

Another symptom is stopping the region server may hang after the above happened.

> cancelTasks in SubprocedurePool can hang during task error
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-11488
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11488
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: snapshots
>    Affects Versions: 0.96.1, 0.99.0, 0.98.3
>            Reporter: Jerry He
>            Assignee: Jerry He
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: HBASE-11488-master.patch
>
>
> During snapshot on the region server side, if one RegionSnapshotTask throws exception, we will cancel other tasks.
> In RegionServerSnapshotManager.SnapshotSubprocedurePool.waitForOutstandingTasks():
> {code}
>       LOG.debug("Waiting for local region snapshots to finish.");
>       int sz = futures.size();
>       try {
>         // Using the completion service to process the futures that finish first first.
>         for (int i = 0; i < sz; i++) {
>           Future<Void> f = taskPool.take();
>           f.get();
>           if (!futures.remove(f)) {
>             LOG.warn("unexpected future" + f);
>           }
>           LOG.debug("Completed " + (i+1) + "/" + sz +  " local region snapshots.");
>         }
>         LOG.debug("Completed " + sz +  " local region snapshots.");
>         return true;
>       } catch (InterruptedException e) {
>         LOG.warn("Got InterruptedException in SnapshotSubprocedurePool", e);
>         if (!stopped) {
>           Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
>           throw new ForeignException("SnapshotSubprocedurePool", e);
>         }
>         // we are stopped so we can just exit.
>       } catch (ExecutionException e) {
>         if (e.getCause() instanceof ForeignException) {
>           LOG.warn("Rethrowing ForeignException from SnapshotSubprocedurePool", e);
>           throw (ForeignException)e.getCause();
>         }
>         LOG.warn("Got Exception in SnapshotSubprocedurePool", e);
>         throw new ForeignException(name, e.getCause());
>       } finally {
>         cancelTasks();
>       }
> {code}
> If  f.get() throws ExecutionException (for example, caused by NotServingRegionException), we will call cancelTasks().
> In cancelTasks():
> {code}
>      ...
>      // evict remaining tasks and futures from taskPool.
>      while (!futures.isEmpty()) {
>         // block to remove cancelled futures;
>         LOG.warn("Removing cancelled elements from taskPool");
>         futures.remove(taskPool.take());
>       }
> {code}
> For example, suppose we have 3 tasks, the first one fails and we get an exception when we do:
> {code}
>           Future<Void> f = taskPool.take();
>           f.get();
> {code}
> We didn't remove the 'f' from the 'futures' list yet, but we already take one from taskPool.
> As a result, there are 3 in 'futures' list, but only 2 remain in taskPool.
> We'll block on taskPool.take() in the above cancelTasks() code.
> The end result is that the procedure will always fail timeout exception in the end. 
> We could have bailed out earlier with the real cause.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)