You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@netbeans.apache.org by Christian Lenz <ch...@gmx.net> on 2017/11/02 14:56:25 UTC

Java 18.3 and IntelliJ

As someone said, it would be great that NetBeans could be the first DIE to Support Java 18.3, well, to late: https://blog.jetbrains.com/idea/2017/11/intellij-idea-2017-3-eap-brings-support-for-local-variable-type-inference/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+jetbrains_intellijidea+%28JetBrains+IntelliJ+IDEA+Blog%29

I mean yeah not to late but there are already News for the next Version of Java in the blog of IntelliJ. Only to let you know that fact.


Regards

Chris

AW: Java 18.3 and IntelliJ

Posted by Christian Lenz <ch...@gmx.net>.
It wasn’t about the Name, only that they are still working on Features of the upcoming Java Version (10 or 2018 or 18.3 or whatever)

Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10

Von: Victor Williams Stafusa da Silva
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. November 2017 17:17
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Java 18.3 and IntelliJ

I know that my opinion is probably irrelevant to those guys, but I think
that if they want to name the version that way, they should at least use
four digit years. This would:

* Avoid some confusion from people asking "we had Java 9 and now Java 18,
where are 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17?"

* Show that we learned a lession from the nasty Y2K bug. Who knows if Java
would still be around in 2100? Few to no people seriously think that it
will, but many software solutions end living way longer than what it is
antecipated and still getting updates and improvements for quite a long
time.

Victor Williams Stafusa da Silva

2017-11-02 12:56 GMT-02:00 Christian Lenz <ch...@gmx.net>:

> As someone said, it would be great that NetBeans could be the first DIE to
> Support Java 18.3, well, to late: https://blog.jetbrains.com/
> idea/2017/11/intellij-idea-2017-3-eap-brings-support-for-
> local-variable-type-inference/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_
> medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+jetbrains_intellijidea+%
> 28JetBrains+IntelliJ+IDEA+Blog%29
>
> I mean yeah not to late but there are already News for the next Version of
> Java in the blog of IntelliJ. Only to let you know that fact.
>
>
> Regards
>
> Chris
>
>

Re: Java 18.3 and IntelliJ

Posted by Victor Williams Stafusa da Silva <vi...@gmail.com>.
I know that my opinion is probably irrelevant to those guys, but I think
that if they want to name the version that way, they should at least use
four digit years. This would:

* Avoid some confusion from people asking "we had Java 9 and now Java 18,
where are 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17?"

* Show that we learned a lession from the nasty Y2K bug. Who knows if Java
would still be around in 2100? Few to no people seriously think that it
will, but many software solutions end living way longer than what it is
antecipated and still getting updates and improvements for quite a long
time.

Victor Williams Stafusa da Silva

2017-11-02 12:56 GMT-02:00 Christian Lenz <ch...@gmx.net>:

> As someone said, it would be great that NetBeans could be the first DIE to
> Support Java 18.3, well, to late: https://blog.jetbrains.com/
> idea/2017/11/intellij-idea-2017-3-eap-brings-support-for-
> local-variable-type-inference/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_
> medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+jetbrains_intellijidea+%
> 28JetBrains+IntelliJ+IDEA+Blog%29
>
> I mean yeah not to late but there are already News for the next Version of
> Java in the blog of IntelliJ. Only to let you know that fact.
>
>
> Regards
>
> Chris
>
>