You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org on 2015/06/01 11:51:26 UTC
[Bug 7203] New: Erroneous 1.0 BODY_URI_ONLY
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7203
Bug ID: 7203
Summary: Erroneous 1.0 BODY_URI_ONLY
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.4.0
Hardware: PC
OS: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Rules
Assignee: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Reporter: yuri@tsoft.com
I am seeing legit messages from tor-talk ML going to spam.
One particular message from May 18, 2015 got labeled with:
> 1.0 BODY_URI_ONLY Message body is only a URI in one line of text or for an image
Its body says:
<<<<
Hi list,Imagine that the trickster god magically downgraded everyone running
Tor to the version of Tor from 2005. Additionally, the trickster god fixes any
bugs found in the past 10 years related to DOS but leaves everything else as it
was.
In such a system, would users of such a Tor network who try to browse
anonymously still be protected against deanonymization?
-Jonathan
-- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or
change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>>>
So it isn't only URL in one line.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7203] Erroneous 1.0 BODY_URI_ONLY
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7203
RW <rw...@googlemail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rwmaillists@googlemail.com
--- Comment #1 from RW <rw...@googlemail.com> ---
It's a line in the normalized body, which is a paragraph. The above contains no
blank lines, so it's a single paragraph.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7203] Erroneous 1.0 BODY_URI_ONLY
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7203
--- Comment #4 from Kevin A. McGrail <km...@pccc.com> ---
The rules are designed for 5.0. 1.5 is pretty aggressive. You might want to
look at adding KAM.cf and raising your score. And discussing what's getting
through on the users list.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7203] Erroneous 1.0 BODY_URI_ONLY
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7203
Yuri <yu...@tsoft.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |yuri@tsoft.com
--- Comment #3 from Yuri <yu...@tsoft.com> ---
Kevin,
5.0 would cause the storm of spam going through. I run with 1.5.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7203] Erroneous 1.0 BODY_URI_ONLY
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7203
Kevin A. McGrail <km...@pccc.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kmcgrail@pccc.com
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #2 from Kevin A. McGrail <km...@pccc.com> ---
thanks RW. Yuri, the email is not going to hit a 5.0 threshold because of a
single 1.0 rule which appears to be firing correctly. Recommend you discuss
this on the SA users mail list.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.