You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to server-dev@james.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2002/10/12 02:32:24 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13564] New: -
Assorted NNTP Protocol Bugs
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13564>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13564
Assorted NNTP Protocol Bugs
Summary: Assorted NNTP Protocol Bugs
Product: James
Version: 2.0a3
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severity: Normal
Priority: Other
Component: NNTPServer & Repository
AssignedTo: james-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: farsight@alum.mit.edu
There are a bunch of outstanding NNTP protocol bugs.
1. Use of STAT, ARTICLE, HEAD, or BODY with an article number argument does
not properly set the current article pointer to the current value.
2. For empty groups the current article pointer is set to 0 rather than being
left invalid when the LISTGROUP or GROUP commands are used. This is contrary
to RFC 2980.
3. For the NEWNEWS or NEWNEWSGROUP commands an absent or ill-formed date
parameter is improperly handled. A response indicating data will be sent is
delivered to the client, and then a NPE is generated, resulting in a close of
the connection. Instead, the server should return a 501 syntax error
4. OVER/XOVER is provided by the server, but the LIST OVERVIEW.FMT is not
supported, contrary to the strong recommendations of RFC 2980
I've got fixes for all of these - am waiting for the current discussion of
server architecture to resolve before I post them.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13564] New: - Assorted NNTP Protocol Bugs
Posted by Harmeet Bedi <ha...@kodemuse.com>.
----- Original Message -----
From: <bu...@apache.org>
> Summary: Assorted NNTP Protocol Bugs
> ReportedBy: farsight@alum.mit.edu
...
> I've got fixes for all of these - am waiting for the current discussion of
> server architecture to resolve before I post them.
Peter,
If these bugs can be resolved without restructuring code, you should check
them in.
If you need to rearchitect or refactor for these fixes, you should post your
proposal and your fixes.
Harmeet
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>