You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to apache-bugdb@apache.org by Michael Handler <ha...@sub-rosa.com> on 2000/12/07 03:28:33 UTC
general/6942: LoadModule statements inside VirtualHost cause SEGV during config parsing/module loading
>Number: 6942
>Category: general
>Synopsis: LoadModule statements inside VirtualHost cause SEGV during config parsing/module loading
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: apache
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: apache
>Arrival-Date: Wed Dec 06 18:30:01 PST 2000
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: handler-web-apache@sub-rosa.com
>Release: 1.3.14
>Organization:
apache
>Environment:
Compiled on:
SunOS build1.ofc1.va.gemnets.com 5.6 Generic_105181-22 sun4u sparc SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIi-cEngine
Bug discovered on:
SunOS cust-web1.dc1.va.bbops.net 5.8 Generic_108528-03 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-60
gcc version 2.95.2
>Description:
Config excerpt:
<VirtualHost 66.18.15.110:8001>
LoadModule jk_module /dist/pkg/jakarta-tomcat/3.2/lib/mod_jk.so
JkWorkersFile /local/service/jakarta-tomcat/3.2/tomcat/conf/workers.properties
JkLogFile /local/service/jakarta-tomcat/3.2/tomcat/logs/mod_jk.log
JkLogLevel error
[...]
Running httpd -t on this config file results in a segmentation fault. I don't
have gdb available tonight, but the core file is saved, and I can provide full
backtraces if requested.
This configuration is indeed most likely completely bogus, but I would much
rather see Apache throw an error in this condition than segfault mysteriously. :)
Full configuration file available as well, if necessary.
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
I reported this problem to Manoj via *cough* IRC, and he implemented a fix in
his local copy, but requested that I submit this bug report for formal
documentation of the problem.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, you need]
[to include <ap...@Apache.Org> in the Cc line and make sure the]
[subject line starts with the report component and number, with ]
[or without any 'Re:' prefixes (such as "general/1098:" or ]
["Re: general/1098:"). If the subject doesn't match this ]
[pattern, your message will be misfiled and ignored. The ]
["apbugs" address is not added to the Cc line of messages from ]
[the database automatically because of the potential for mail ]
[loops. If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ]
[nored unless you are responding to an explicit request from a ]
[developer. Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ]