You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tika.apache.org by "Chris A. Mattmann (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/08/20 16:02:19 UTC

[jira] Commented: (TIKA-488) Add alternative search provider on site

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12900695#action_12900695 ] 

Chris A. Mattmann commented on TIKA-488:
----------------------------------------

Hi Alex,

Thanks for this patch! I'm wondering -- why keep the choice for a year? I don't really get that. How about we just expose a select list or something and let the user explicitly choose?

Cheers,
Chris


> Add alternative search provider on site
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TIKA-488
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-488
>             Project: Tika
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: documentation
>            Reporter: Alex Baranau
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: adding_alternative_search_provider.patch
>
>
> Add additional search provider (to existed Lucid Find) search-lucene.com.
> Initiated in discussion: http://www.search-lucene.com/m/uTJxE2kcRv1
> Requirements (copied from discussion):
> Jukka Zitting: "Ideally the search box would allow the user to choose which provider
> to use. Something like a cookie that remembers the user's selection
> would be nice. If the user doesn't make an explicit selection of the
> provider, then one should be selected randomly for the first search
> and remembered afterwards for consistency.
> It would be great if the required logic was implemented on the client
> side using javascript, as otherwise we'd need to start messing up with
> CGI scripts, etc."

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.