You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Luca Cavanna <ja...@apache.org> on 2024/10/10 07:24:21 UTC
[VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC4
Please vote for release candidate 4 for Lucene 10.0.0
I published a draft of the release notes at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0 .
Feedback is welcome. Feel free to edit directly.
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2024-10-13 08:00 UTC.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Here is my +1
SUCCESS! [0:59:11.080740]
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC4
Posted by Luca Cavanna <ja...@apache.org>.
Thanks for the review Uwe!
I already pushed an update to the website, the updated release notes are
already live. I also updated the release content in github.
Cheers
Luca
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 6:02 PM Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> OK thanks, will check the webssite later unless you have pushed an update
> already!
>
> I have also seen this commit regarding the expressions in the
> lucene10-dev-branch of Elasticsearch, looks fine:
> https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/commit/98ea807e79a7e130830aa61d2bd537b1a626f1c9
>
> (the removed classloading is fine because all functions called by the
> script must be linked before using a MethodHandles.Lookup instance. The
> built-in functions are all hardcoded and safe.
>
> The previous commit with the IOException looks strange, because also in
> previous versions IOException could have been thrown, it just wasn't
> declared (a bug in expressions).
>
> Uwe
> Am 14.10.2024 um 17:03 schrieb Luca Cavanna:
>
> You were! :) We can always update the news page on the website with your
> additional content.
>
> Cheers
> Luca
>
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 4:52 PM Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>
>> Looks like I was one minute too late. 🥹
>>
>> Uwe
>>
>>
>> Am 14. Oktober 2024 15:05:03 MESZ schrieb Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de
>> >:
>>
>>> Done.
>>>
>>> Uwe
>>> Am 14.10.2024 um 11:13 schrieb Luca Cavanna:
>>>
>>>
>>> @Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de> we have adapted Elasticsearch to the
>>> expressions engine changes, no issues so far, that looked like a very nice
>>> simplification. Agreed that painless should also be updated to work
>>> similarly.
>>>
>>> Would you like to add the expressions changes to the release notes
>>> perhaps?
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0
>>> /
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 10:51 AM Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 SUCCESS! [0:48:05.011843]
>>>>
>>>> I also ran the "Search Benchmark, the Game" benchmark between Lucene
>>>> 9.12 and Lucene 10 (https://tantivy-search.github.io/bench/),
>>>> differences were just noise.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 8:00 PM Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> P.S.: I also noticed the copyright typo in the NOTICE.txt file. If we
>>>>> respin, let's fix it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Uwe
>>>>> Am 13.10.2024 um 19:49 schrieb Uwe Schindler:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I had not much time to look closely into the artifacts, but I let
>>>>> Policeman Jenkins run the smoke tester with Java 21, 22, 23:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-10.x-Release-Tester/1/console
>>>>>
>>>>> The system reported success, so in case of any doubt: The release
>>>>> looks ready for all three Java versions.
>>>>>
>>>>> I also opened existing indexes with Luke and it was successful. I was
>>>>> just wondering; this index with Codec Version Lucene80 opened successfully
>>>>> (I created it 3 years ago on my old laptop and it was lingering in some
>>>>> directory):
>>>>>
>>>>> I think this worked because the index was created with 9.0, but I
>>>>> wonder about codec format Lucene80.
>>>>>
>>>>> *One thing I am specially interested: *Did somebody already ported
>>>>> the expressions module changes in Elasticsearch? The new module no longer
>>>>> supports custom classloaders, but it is a much safer alternative than the
>>>>> old code as it requires "pre-linked" method handles (in fact it is 100%
>>>>> safe and cannot leak any custom function to unsafe script writers, because
>>>>> it is impossible to call any code from JDK without a pre-resolved
>>>>> MethodHandle in place). There is a deperecated API to convert custom
>>>>> function maps, but I'd liker to know if there were any problem (I checked
>>>>> Javadocs that nobody removed this API during deprecated API cleanup,
>>>>> because it was added to support backwards compatibility). My personal
>>>>> favourite in this release is next to the changes in MMapDirectory abot
>>>>> preloading (thanks Adrien!) is the updated expressions module because it
>>>>> uses the latest and greatest way to compile code using dynamic constants to
>>>>> effectively call static methods from the APIs - Lucene is the first dynamic
>>>>> language external to JDK using this. I am just interested if some
>>>>> Elasticsearch security people complained about the missing classloader
>>>>> support (which is inappropriate now as the MethodHandles provided by dnamic
>>>>> constants in the java files with a dynamic lookup at runtime offer much
>>>>> more safety to invalid invocations; I'd suggest to rewrite painless to use
>>>>> it, too). If they do, bring them in contact with me!
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is my +1 to release!
>>>>>
>>>>> Uwe
>>>>> Am 10.10.2024 um 09:24 schrieb Luca Cavanna:
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote for release candidate 4 for Lucene 10.0.0
>>>>>
>>>>> I published a draft of the release notes at
>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0 .
>>>>> Feedback is welcome. Feel free to edit directly.
>>>>>
>>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>>>>>
>>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>>>
>>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>>>
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>>>>>
>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2024-10-13
>>>>> 08:00 UTC.
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is my +1
>>>>>
>>>>> SUCCESS! [0:59:11.080740]
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Uwe Schindler
>>>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremenhttps://www.thetaphi.de
>>>>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Uwe Schindler
>>>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremenhttps://www.thetaphi.de
>>>>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Adrien
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Uwe Schindler
>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremenhttps://www.thetaphi.de
>>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>>
>>> --
>> Uwe Schindler
>> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen
>> https://www.thetaphi.de
>>
> --
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremenhttps://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC4
Posted by Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de>.
OK thanks, will check the webssite later unless you have pushed an
update already!
I have also seen this commit regarding the expressions in the
lucene10-dev-branch of Elasticsearch, looks fine:
https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/commit/98ea807e79a7e130830aa61d2bd537b1a626f1c9
(the removed classloading is fine because all functions called by the
script must be linked before using a MethodHandles.Lookup instance. The
built-in functions are all hardcoded and safe.
The previous commit with the IOException looks strange, because also in
previous versions IOException could have been thrown, it just wasn't
declared (a bug in expressions).
Uwe
Am 14.10.2024 um 17:03 schrieb Luca Cavanna:
> You were! :) We can always update the news page on the website with
> your additional content.
>
> Cheers
> Luca
>
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 4:52 PM Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>
> Looks like I was one minute too late. 🥹
>
> Uwe
>
>
> Am 14. Oktober 2024 15:05:03 MESZ schrieb Uwe Schindler
> <uw...@thetaphi.de>:
>
> Done.
>
> Uwe
>
> Am 14.10.2024 um 11:13 schrieb Luca Cavanna:
>>
>> @Uwe Schindler <ma...@thetaphi.de> we have adapted
>> Elasticsearch to the expressions engine changes, no issues so
>> far, that looked like a very nice simplification. Agreed that
>> painless should also be updated to work similarly.
>>
>> Would you like to add the expressions changes to the release
>> notes perhaps?
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0
>> /
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 10:51 AM Adrien Grand
>> <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1 SUCCESS! [0:48:05.011843]
>>
>> I also ran the "Search Benchmark, the Game" benchmark
>> between Lucene 9.12 and Lucene 10
>> (https://tantivy-search.github.io/bench/), differences
>> were just noise.
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 8:00 PM Uwe Schindler
>> <uw...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>>
>> P.S.: I also noticed the copyright typo in the
>> NOTICE.txt file. If we respin, let's fix it.
>>
>> Uwe
>>
>> Am 13.10.2024 um 19:49 schrieb Uwe Schindler:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I had not much time to look closely into the
>>> artifacts, but I let Policeman Jenkins run the smoke
>>> tester with Java 21, 22, 23:
>>>
>>> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-10.x-Release-Tester/1/console
>>>
>>> The system reported success, so in case of any
>>> doubt: The release looks ready for all three Java
>>> versions.
>>>
>>> I also opened existing indexes with Luke and it was
>>> successful. I was just wondering; this index with
>>> Codec Version Lucene80 opened successfully (I
>>> created it 3 years ago on my old laptop and it was
>>> lingering in some directory):
>>>
>>> I think this worked because the index was created
>>> with 9.0, but I wonder about codec format Lucene80.
>>>
>>> *One thing I am specially interested: *Did somebody
>>> already ported the expressions module changes in
>>> Elasticsearch? The new module no longer supports
>>> custom classloaders, but it is a much safer
>>> alternative than the old code as it requires
>>> "pre-linked" method handles (in fact it is 100% safe
>>> and cannot leak any custom function to unsafe script
>>> writers, because it is impossible to call any code
>>> from JDK without a pre-resolved MethodHandle in
>>> place). There is a deperecated API to convert custom
>>> function maps, but I'd liker to know if there were
>>> any problem (I checked Javadocs that nobody removed
>>> this API during deprecated API cleanup, because it
>>> was added to support backwards compatibility). My
>>> personal favourite in this release is next to the
>>> changes in MMapDirectory abot preloading (thanks
>>> Adrien!) is the updated expressions module because
>>> it uses the latest and greatest way to compile code
>>> using dynamic constants to effectively call static
>>> methods from the APIs - Lucene is the first dynamic
>>> language external to JDK using this. I am just
>>> interested if some Elasticsearch security people
>>> complained about the missing classloader support
>>> (which is inappropriate now as the MethodHandles
>>> provided by dnamic constants in the java files with
>>> a dynamic lookup at runtime offer much more safety
>>> to invalid invocations; I'd suggest to rewrite
>>> painless to use it, too). If they do, bring them in
>>> contact with me!
>>>
>>> Here is my +1 to release!
>>>
>>> Uwe
>>>
>>> Am 10.10.2024 um 09:24 schrieb Luca Cavanna:
>>>> Please vote for release candidate 4 for Lucene 10.0.0
>>>>
>>>> I published a draft of the release notes at
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0 .
>>>> Feedback is welcome. Feel free to edit directly.
>>>>
>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>>>>
>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this
>>>> command:
>>>>
>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>>>>
>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e.
>>>> until 2024-10-13 08:00 UTC.
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>
>>>> Here is my +1
>>>>
>>>> SUCCESS! [0:59:11.080740]
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Uwe Schindler
>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>>> https://www.thetaphi.de
>>> eMail:uwe@thetaphi.de
>>
>> --
>> Uwe Schindler
>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>> https://www.thetaphi.de
>> eMail:uwe@thetaphi.de
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Adrien
>>
> --
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> https://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail:uwe@thetaphi.de
>
> --
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen
> https://www.thetaphi.de
>
--
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
https://www.thetaphi.de
eMail:uwe@thetaphi.de
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC4
Posted by Luca Cavanna <ja...@apache.org>.
You were! :) We can always update the news page on the website with your
additional content.
Cheers
Luca
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 4:52 PM Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> Looks like I was one minute too late. 🥹
>
> Uwe
>
>
> Am 14. Oktober 2024 15:05:03 MESZ schrieb Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de>:
>
>> Done.
>>
>> Uwe
>> Am 14.10.2024 um 11:13 schrieb Luca Cavanna:
>>
>>
>> @Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de> we have adapted Elasticsearch to the
>> expressions engine changes, no issues so far, that looked like a very nice
>> simplification. Agreed that painless should also be updated to work
>> similarly.
>>
>> Would you like to add the expressions changes to the release notes
>> perhaps?
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0
>> /
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 10:51 AM Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 SUCCESS! [0:48:05.011843]
>>>
>>> I also ran the "Search Benchmark, the Game" benchmark between Lucene
>>> 9.12 and Lucene 10 (https://tantivy-search.github.io/bench/),
>>> differences were just noise.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 8:00 PM Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> P.S.: I also noticed the copyright typo in the NOTICE.txt file. If we
>>>> respin, let's fix it.
>>>>
>>>> Uwe
>>>> Am 13.10.2024 um 19:49 schrieb Uwe Schindler:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I had not much time to look closely into the artifacts, but I let
>>>> Policeman Jenkins run the smoke tester with Java 21, 22, 23:
>>>>
>>>> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-10.x-Release-Tester/1/console
>>>>
>>>> The system reported success, so in case of any doubt: The release looks
>>>> ready for all three Java versions.
>>>>
>>>> I also opened existing indexes with Luke and it was successful. I was
>>>> just wondering; this index with Codec Version Lucene80 opened successfully
>>>> (I created it 3 years ago on my old laptop and it was lingering in some
>>>> directory):
>>>>
>>>> I think this worked because the index was created with 9.0, but I
>>>> wonder about codec format Lucene80.
>>>>
>>>> *One thing I am specially interested: *Did somebody already ported the
>>>> expressions module changes in Elasticsearch? The new module no longer
>>>> supports custom classloaders, but it is a much safer alternative than the
>>>> old code as it requires "pre-linked" method handles (in fact it is 100%
>>>> safe and cannot leak any custom function to unsafe script writers, because
>>>> it is impossible to call any code from JDK without a pre-resolved
>>>> MethodHandle in place). There is a deperecated API to convert custom
>>>> function maps, but I'd liker to know if there were any problem (I checked
>>>> Javadocs that nobody removed this API during deprecated API cleanup,
>>>> because it was added to support backwards compatibility). My personal
>>>> favourite in this release is next to the changes in MMapDirectory abot
>>>> preloading (thanks Adrien!) is the updated expressions module because it
>>>> uses the latest and greatest way to compile code using dynamic constants to
>>>> effectively call static methods from the APIs - Lucene is the first dynamic
>>>> language external to JDK using this. I am just interested if some
>>>> Elasticsearch security people complained about the missing classloader
>>>> support (which is inappropriate now as the MethodHandles provided by dnamic
>>>> constants in the java files with a dynamic lookup at runtime offer much
>>>> more safety to invalid invocations; I'd suggest to rewrite painless to use
>>>> it, too). If they do, bring them in contact with me!
>>>>
>>>> Here is my +1 to release!
>>>>
>>>> Uwe
>>>> Am 10.10.2024 um 09:24 schrieb Luca Cavanna:
>>>>
>>>> Please vote for release candidate 4 for Lucene 10.0.0
>>>>
>>>> I published a draft of the release notes at
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0 .
>>>> Feedback is welcome. Feel free to edit directly.
>>>>
>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>>>>
>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>>
>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>>>>
>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2024-10-13 08:00
>>>> UTC.
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>
>>>> Here is my +1
>>>>
>>>> SUCCESS! [0:59:11.080740]
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Uwe Schindler
>>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremenhttps://www.thetaphi.de
>>>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Uwe Schindler
>>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremenhttps://www.thetaphi.de
>>>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Adrien
>>>
>> --
>> Uwe Schindler
>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremenhttps://www.thetaphi.de
>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>
>> --
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen
> https://www.thetaphi.de
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC4
Posted by Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de>.
Looks like I was one minute too late. 🥹
Uwe
Am 14. Oktober 2024 15:05:03 MESZ schrieb Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de>:
>Done.
>
>Uwe
>
>Am 14.10.2024 um 11:13 schrieb Luca Cavanna:
>>
>> @Uwe Schindler <ma...@thetaphi.de> we have adapted Elasticsearch to the expressions engine changes, no issues so far, that looked like a very nice simplification. Agreed that painless should also be updated to work similarly.
>>
>> Would you like to add the expressions changes to the release notes perhaps? https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0 /
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 10:51 AM Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1 SUCCESS! [0:48:05.011843]
>>
>> I also ran the "Search Benchmark, the Game" benchmark between
>> Lucene 9.12 and Lucene 10
>> (https://tantivy-search.github.io/bench/), differences were just
>> noise.
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 8:00 PM Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>>
>> P.S.: I also noticed the copyright typo in the NOTICE.txt
>> file. If we respin, let's fix it.
>>
>> Uwe
>>
>> Am 13.10.2024 um 19:49 schrieb Uwe Schindler:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I had not much time to look closely into the artifacts, but I
>>> let Policeman Jenkins run the smoke tester with Java 21, 22, 23:
>>>
>>> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-10.x-Release-Tester/1/console
>>>
>>> The system reported success, so in case of any doubt: The
>>> release looks ready for all three Java versions.
>>>
>>> I also opened existing indexes with Luke and it was
>>> successful. I was just wondering; this index with Codec
>>> Version Lucene80 opened successfully (I created it 3 years
>>> ago on my old laptop and it was lingering in some directory):
>>>
>>> I think this worked because the index was created with 9.0,
>>> but I wonder about codec format Lucene80.
>>>
>>> *One thing I am specially interested: *Did somebody already
>>> ported the expressions module changes in Elasticsearch? The
>>> new module no longer supports custom classloaders, but it is
>>> a much safer alternative than the old code as it requires
>>> "pre-linked" method handles (in fact it is 100% safe and
>>> cannot leak any custom function to unsafe script writers,
>>> because it is impossible to call any code from JDK without a
>>> pre-resolved MethodHandle in place). There is a deperecated
>>> API to convert custom function maps, but I'd liker to know if
>>> there were any problem (I checked Javadocs that nobody
>>> removed this API during deprecated API cleanup, because it
>>> was added to support backwards compatibility). My personal
>>> favourite in this release is next to the changes in
>>> MMapDirectory abot preloading (thanks Adrien!) is the updated
>>> expressions module because it uses the latest and greatest
>>> way to compile code using dynamic constants to effectively
>>> call static methods from the APIs - Lucene is the first
>>> dynamic language external to JDK using this. I am just
>>> interested if some Elasticsearch security people complained
>>> about the missing classloader support (which is inappropriate
>>> now as the MethodHandles provided by dnamic constants in the
>>> java files with a dynamic lookup at runtime offer much more
>>> safety to invalid invocations; I'd suggest to rewrite
>>> painless to use it, too). If they do, bring them in contact
>>> with me!
>>>
>>> Here is my +1 to release!
>>>
>>> Uwe
>>>
>>> Am 10.10.2024 um 09:24 schrieb Luca Cavanna:
>>>> Please vote for release candidate 4 for Lucene 10.0.0
>>>>
>>>> I published a draft of the release notes at
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0 .
>>>> Feedback is welcome. Feel free to edit directly.
>>>>
>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>>>>
>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>>
>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>>>>
>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until
>>>> 2024-10-13 08:00 UTC.
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>
>>>> Here is my +1
>>>>
>>>> SUCCESS! [0:59:11.080740]
>>>>
>>> -- Uwe Schindler
>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>>> https://www.thetaphi.de
>>> eMail:uwe@thetaphi.de
>>
>> -- Uwe Schindler
>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>> https://www.thetaphi.de
>> eMail:uwe@thetaphi.de
>>
>>
>>
>> -- Adrien
>>
>--
>Uwe Schindler
>Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>https://www.thetaphi.de
>eMail:uwe@thetaphi.de
--
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen
https://www.thetaphi.de
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC4
Posted by Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de>.
Done.
Uwe
Am 14.10.2024 um 11:13 schrieb Luca Cavanna:
>
> @Uwe Schindler <ma...@thetaphi.de> we have adapted Elasticsearch
> to the expressions engine changes, no issues so far, that looked like
> a very nice simplification. Agreed that painless should also be
> updated to work similarly.
>
> Would you like to add the expressions changes to the release notes
> perhaps?
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0 /
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 10:51 AM Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 SUCCESS! [0:48:05.011843]
>
> I also ran the "Search Benchmark, the Game" benchmark between
> Lucene 9.12 and Lucene 10
> (https://tantivy-search.github.io/bench/), differences were just
> noise.
>
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 8:00 PM Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>
> P.S.: I also noticed the copyright typo in the NOTICE.txt
> file. If we respin, let's fix it.
>
> Uwe
>
> Am 13.10.2024 um 19:49 schrieb Uwe Schindler:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I had not much time to look closely into the artifacts, but I
>> let Policeman Jenkins run the smoke tester with Java 21, 22, 23:
>>
>> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-10.x-Release-Tester/1/console
>>
>> The system reported success, so in case of any doubt: The
>> release looks ready for all three Java versions.
>>
>> I also opened existing indexes with Luke and it was
>> successful. I was just wondering; this index with Codec
>> Version Lucene80 opened successfully (I created it 3 years
>> ago on my old laptop and it was lingering in some directory):
>>
>> I think this worked because the index was created with 9.0,
>> but I wonder about codec format Lucene80.
>>
>> *One thing I am specially interested: *Did somebody already
>> ported the expressions module changes in Elasticsearch? The
>> new module no longer supports custom classloaders, but it is
>> a much safer alternative than the old code as it requires
>> "pre-linked" method handles (in fact it is 100% safe and
>> cannot leak any custom function to unsafe script writers,
>> because it is impossible to call any code from JDK without a
>> pre-resolved MethodHandle in place). There is a deperecated
>> API to convert custom function maps, but I'd liker to know if
>> there were any problem (I checked Javadocs that nobody
>> removed this API during deprecated API cleanup, because it
>> was added to support backwards compatibility). My personal
>> favourite in this release is next to the changes in
>> MMapDirectory abot preloading (thanks Adrien!) is the updated
>> expressions module because it uses the latest and greatest
>> way to compile code using dynamic constants to effectively
>> call static methods from the APIs - Lucene is the first
>> dynamic language external to JDK using this. I am just
>> interested if some Elasticsearch security people complained
>> about the missing classloader support (which is inappropriate
>> now as the MethodHandles provided by dnamic constants in the
>> java files with a dynamic lookup at runtime offer much more
>> safety to invalid invocations; I'd suggest to rewrite
>> painless to use it, too). If they do, bring them in contact
>> with me!
>>
>> Here is my +1 to release!
>>
>> Uwe
>>
>> Am 10.10.2024 um 09:24 schrieb Luca Cavanna:
>>> Please vote for release candidate 4 for Lucene 10.0.0
>>>
>>> I published a draft of the release notes at
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0 .
>>> Feedback is welcome. Feel free to edit directly.
>>>
>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>>>
>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>
>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until
>>> 2024-10-13 08:00 UTC.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>> Here is my +1
>>>
>>> SUCCESS! [0:59:11.080740]
>>>
>> --
>> Uwe Schindler
>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>> https://www.thetaphi.de
>> eMail:uwe@thetaphi.de
>
> --
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> https://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail:uwe@thetaphi.de
>
>
>
> --
> Adrien
>
--
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
https://www.thetaphi.de
eMail:uwe@thetaphi.de
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC4
Posted by Luca Cavanna <ja...@apache.org>.
@Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de> we have adapted Elasticsearch to the
expressions engine changes, no issues so far, that looked like a very nice
simplification. Agreed that painless should also be updated to work
similarly.
Would you like to add the expressions changes to the release notes perhaps?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0 /
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 10:51 AM Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 SUCCESS! [0:48:05.011843]
>
> I also ran the "Search Benchmark, the Game" benchmark between Lucene 9.12
> and Lucene 10 (https://tantivy-search.github.io/bench/), differences were
> just noise.
>
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 8:00 PM Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>
>> P.S.: I also noticed the copyright typo in the NOTICE.txt file. If we
>> respin, let's fix it.
>>
>> Uwe
>> Am 13.10.2024 um 19:49 schrieb Uwe Schindler:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I had not much time to look closely into the artifacts, but I let
>> Policeman Jenkins run the smoke tester with Java 21, 22, 23:
>>
>> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-10.x-Release-Tester/1/console
>>
>> The system reported success, so in case of any doubt: The release looks
>> ready for all three Java versions.
>>
>> I also opened existing indexes with Luke and it was successful. I was
>> just wondering; this index with Codec Version Lucene80 opened successfully
>> (I created it 3 years ago on my old laptop and it was lingering in some
>> directory):
>>
>> I think this worked because the index was created with 9.0, but I wonder
>> about codec format Lucene80.
>>
>> *One thing I am specially interested: *Did somebody already ported the
>> expressions module changes in Elasticsearch? The new module no longer
>> supports custom classloaders, but it is a much safer alternative than the
>> old code as it requires "pre-linked" method handles (in fact it is 100%
>> safe and cannot leak any custom function to unsafe script writers, because
>> it is impossible to call any code from JDK without a pre-resolved
>> MethodHandle in place). There is a deperecated API to convert custom
>> function maps, but I'd liker to know if there were any problem (I checked
>> Javadocs that nobody removed this API during deprecated API cleanup,
>> because it was added to support backwards compatibility). My personal
>> favourite in this release is next to the changes in MMapDirectory abot
>> preloading (thanks Adrien!) is the updated expressions module because it
>> uses the latest and greatest way to compile code using dynamic constants to
>> effectively call static methods from the APIs - Lucene is the first dynamic
>> language external to JDK using this. I am just interested if some
>> Elasticsearch security people complained about the missing classloader
>> support (which is inappropriate now as the MethodHandles provided by dnamic
>> constants in the java files with a dynamic lookup at runtime offer much
>> more safety to invalid invocations; I'd suggest to rewrite painless to use
>> it, too). If they do, bring them in contact with me!
>>
>> Here is my +1 to release!
>>
>> Uwe
>> Am 10.10.2024 um 09:24 schrieb Luca Cavanna:
>>
>> Please vote for release candidate 4 for Lucene 10.0.0
>>
>> I published a draft of the release notes at
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0 .
>> Feedback is welcome. Feel free to edit directly.
>>
>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>>
>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>
>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2024-10-13 08:00
>> UTC.
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> Here is my +1
>>
>> SUCCESS! [0:59:11.080740]
>>
>> --
>> Uwe Schindler
>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremenhttps://www.thetaphi.de
>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>
>> --
>> Uwe Schindler
>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremenhttps://www.thetaphi.de
>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>
>>
>
> --
> Adrien
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC4
Posted by Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>.
+1 SUCCESS! [0:48:05.011843]
I also ran the "Search Benchmark, the Game" benchmark between Lucene 9.12
and Lucene 10 (https://tantivy-search.github.io/bench/), differences were
just noise.
On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 8:00 PM Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> P.S.: I also noticed the copyright typo in the NOTICE.txt file. If we
> respin, let's fix it.
>
> Uwe
> Am 13.10.2024 um 19:49 schrieb Uwe Schindler:
>
> Hi,
>
> I had not much time to look closely into the artifacts, but I let
> Policeman Jenkins run the smoke tester with Java 21, 22, 23:
>
> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-10.x-Release-Tester/1/console
>
> The system reported success, so in case of any doubt: The release looks
> ready for all three Java versions.
>
> I also opened existing indexes with Luke and it was successful. I was just
> wondering; this index with Codec Version Lucene80 opened successfully (I
> created it 3 years ago on my old laptop and it was lingering in some
> directory):
>
> I think this worked because the index was created with 9.0, but I wonder
> about codec format Lucene80.
>
> *One thing I am specially interested: *Did somebody already ported the
> expressions module changes in Elasticsearch? The new module no longer
> supports custom classloaders, but it is a much safer alternative than the
> old code as it requires "pre-linked" method handles (in fact it is 100%
> safe and cannot leak any custom function to unsafe script writers, because
> it is impossible to call any code from JDK without a pre-resolved
> MethodHandle in place). There is a deperecated API to convert custom
> function maps, but I'd liker to know if there were any problem (I checked
> Javadocs that nobody removed this API during deprecated API cleanup,
> because it was added to support backwards compatibility). My personal
> favourite in this release is next to the changes in MMapDirectory abot
> preloading (thanks Adrien!) is the updated expressions module because it
> uses the latest and greatest way to compile code using dynamic constants to
> effectively call static methods from the APIs - Lucene is the first dynamic
> language external to JDK using this. I am just interested if some
> Elasticsearch security people complained about the missing classloader
> support (which is inappropriate now as the MethodHandles provided by dnamic
> constants in the java files with a dynamic lookup at runtime offer much
> more safety to invalid invocations; I'd suggest to rewrite painless to use
> it, too). If they do, bring them in contact with me!
>
> Here is my +1 to release!
>
> Uwe
> Am 10.10.2024 um 09:24 schrieb Luca Cavanna:
>
> Please vote for release candidate 4 for Lucene 10.0.0
>
> I published a draft of the release notes at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0 .
> Feedback is welcome. Feel free to edit directly.
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2024-10-13 08:00
> UTC.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Here is my +1
>
> SUCCESS! [0:59:11.080740]
>
> --
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremenhttps://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>
> --
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremenhttps://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>
>
--
Adrien
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC4
Posted by Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de>.
P.S.: I also noticed the copyright typo in the NOTICE.txt file. If we
respin, let's fix it.
Uwe
Am 13.10.2024 um 19:49 schrieb Uwe Schindler:
>
> Hi,
>
> I had not much time to look closely into the artifacts, but I let
> Policeman Jenkins run the smoke tester with Java 21, 22, 23:
>
> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-10.x-Release-Tester/1/console
>
> The system reported success, so in case of any doubt: The release
> looks ready for all three Java versions.
>
> I also opened existing indexes with Luke and it was successful. I was
> just wondering; this index with Codec Version Lucene80 opened
> successfully (I created it 3 years ago on my old laptop and it was
> lingering in some directory):
>
> I think this worked because the index was created with 9.0, but I
> wonder about codec format Lucene80.
>
> *One thing I am specially interested: *Did somebody already ported the
> expressions module changes in Elasticsearch? The new module no longer
> supports custom classloaders, but it is a much safer alternative than
> the old code as it requires "pre-linked" method handles (in fact it is
> 100% safe and cannot leak any custom function to unsafe script
> writers, because it is impossible to call any code from JDK without a
> pre-resolved MethodHandle in place). There is a deperecated API to
> convert custom function maps, but I'd liker to know if there were any
> problem (I checked Javadocs that nobody removed this API during
> deprecated API cleanup, because it was added to support backwards
> compatibility). My personal favourite in this release is next to the
> changes in MMapDirectory abot preloading (thanks Adrien!) is the
> updated expressions module because it uses the latest and greatest way
> to compile code using dynamic constants to effectively call static
> methods from the APIs - Lucene is the first dynamic language external
> to JDK using this. I am just interested if some Elasticsearch security
> people complained about the missing classloader support (which is
> inappropriate now as the MethodHandles provided by dnamic constants in
> the java files with a dynamic lookup at runtime offer much more safety
> to invalid invocations; I'd suggest to rewrite painless to use it,
> too). If they do, bring them in contact with me!
>
> Here is my +1 to release!
>
> Uwe
>
> Am 10.10.2024 um 09:24 schrieb Luca Cavanna:
>> Please vote for release candidate 4 for Lucene 10.0.0
>>
>> I published a draft of the release notes at
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0 .
>> Feedback is welcome. Feel free to edit directly.
>>
>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>>
>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>
>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2024-10-13
>> 08:00 UTC.
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> Here is my +1
>>
>> SUCCESS! [0:59:11.080740]
>>
> --
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> https://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail:uwe@thetaphi.de
--
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
https://www.thetaphi.de
eMail:uwe@thetaphi.de
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC4
Posted by Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de>.
Hi,
I had not much time to look closely into the artifacts, but I let
Policeman Jenkins run the smoke tester with Java 21, 22, 23:
https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-10.x-Release-Tester/1/console
The system reported success, so in case of any doubt: The release looks
ready for all three Java versions.
I also opened existing indexes with Luke and it was successful. I was
just wondering; this index with Codec Version Lucene80 opened
successfully (I created it 3 years ago on my old laptop and it was
lingering in some directory):
I think this worked because the index was created with 9.0, but I wonder
about codec format Lucene80.
*One thing I am specially interested: *Did somebody already ported the
expressions module changes in Elasticsearch? The new module no longer
supports custom classloaders, but it is a much safer alternative than
the old code as it requires "pre-linked" method handles (in fact it is
100% safe and cannot leak any custom function to unsafe script writers,
because it is impossible to call any code from JDK without a
pre-resolved MethodHandle in place). There is a deperecated API to
convert custom function maps, but I'd liker to know if there were any
problem (I checked Javadocs that nobody removed this API during
deprecated API cleanup, because it was added to support backwards
compatibility). My personal favourite in this release is next to the
changes in MMapDirectory abot preloading (thanks Adrien!) is the updated
expressions module because it uses the latest and greatest way to
compile code using dynamic constants to effectively call static methods
from the APIs - Lucene is the first dynamic language external to JDK
using this. I am just interested if some Elasticsearch security people
complained about the missing classloader support (which is inappropriate
now as the MethodHandles provided by dnamic constants in the java files
with a dynamic lookup at runtime offer much more safety to invalid
invocations; I'd suggest to rewrite painless to use it, too). If they
do, bring them in contact with me!
Here is my +1 to release!
Uwe
Am 10.10.2024 um 09:24 schrieb Luca Cavanna:
> Please vote for release candidate 4 for Lucene 10.0.0
>
> I published a draft of the release notes at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0 .
> Feedback is welcome. Feel free to edit directly.
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2024-10-13
> 08:00 UTC.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Here is my +1
>
> SUCCESS! [0:59:11.080740]
>
--
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
https://www.thetaphi.de
eMail:uwe@thetaphi.de
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC4
Posted by Patrick Zhai <zh...@gmail.com>.
SUCCESS! [1:13:39.316068]
+1
I also have run an extra knn benchmark with 9.12 and 10.0, verified no
recall degradation
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 1:51 PM Benjamin Trent <be...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> SUCCESS! [0:56:23.261438]
>
> + 1!
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 1:16 PM Dawid Weiss <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > SUCCESS! [1:20:05.964755]
> >
> > +1.
> >
> > I've reviewed the artifacts, ran Luke, etc. Nothing caught my attention
> other than the NOTICE.txt file -
> >
> > Apache Lucene
> > Copyright 2001-2022 The Apache Software Foundation
> >
> > Don't know if this should be updated (perhaps). Not a blocker,
> definitely.
> >
> > Dawid
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 9:26 AM Luca Cavanna <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Please vote for release candidate 4 for Lucene 10.0.0
> >>
> >> I published a draft of the release notes at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0 .
> Feedback is welcome. Feel free to edit directly.
> >>
> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
> >>
> >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> >>
> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
> >>
> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2024-10-13 08:00
> UTC.
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 approve
> >> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >>
> >> Here is my +1
> >>
> >> SUCCESS! [0:59:11.080740]
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC4
Posted by Benjamin Trent <be...@gmail.com>.
SUCCESS! [0:56:23.261438]
+ 1!
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 1:16 PM Dawid Weiss <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> SUCCESS! [1:20:05.964755]
>
> +1.
>
> I've reviewed the artifacts, ran Luke, etc. Nothing caught my attention other than the NOTICE.txt file -
>
> Apache Lucene
> Copyright 2001-2022 The Apache Software Foundation
>
> Don't know if this should be updated (perhaps). Not a blocker, definitely.
>
> Dawid
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 9:26 AM Luca Cavanna <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Please vote for release candidate 4 for Lucene 10.0.0
>>
>> I published a draft of the release notes at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0 . Feedback is welcome. Feel free to edit directly.
>>
>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>>
>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>
>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2024-10-13 08:00 UTC.
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> Here is my +1
>>
>> SUCCESS! [0:59:11.080740]
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC4
Posted by Dawid Weiss <da...@gmail.com>.
SUCCESS! [1:20:05.964755]
+1.
I've reviewed the artifacts, ran Luke, etc. Nothing caught my attention
other than the NOTICE.txt file -
Apache Lucene
Copyright 2001-2022 The Apache Software Foundation
Don't know if this should be updated (perhaps). Not a blocker, definitely.
Dawid
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 9:26 AM Luca Cavanna <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> Please vote for release candidate 4 for Lucene 10.0.0
>
> I published a draft of the release notes at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0 .
> Feedback is welcome. Feel free to edit directly.
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2024-10-13 08:00
> UTC.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Here is my +1
>
> SUCCESS! [0:59:11.080740]
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC4
Posted by Gautam Worah <wo...@gmail.com>.
+1 SUCCESS! [0:52:03.740190]
Best,
Gautam Worah.
On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 2:35 PM Shubham Chaudhary <sh...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 SUCCESS! [0:40:49.312888]
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 7:16 PM Stefan Vodita <st...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you Chris!
>>
>> On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 at 01:43, Chris Hegarty
>> <ch...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Stefan,
>>>
>>> > On 11 Oct 2024, at 08:09, Stefan Vodita <st...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > No worries at all Chris, I didn't know we could retroactively
>>> > edit the release notes for 9.12. I've gone ahead and added
>>> > an entry for the aggregation engine.
>>>
>>> I’ve taken the update that you made to the draft notes on the wiki, and
>>> updated the website [1].
>>>
>>> You can see Match-time aggregation engine now listed under the new
>>> features section of the 9.12.0 release announcement. See,
>>>
>>> https://lucene.apache.org/core/corenews.html#apache-lucenetm-9120-available
>>>
>>> -Chris.
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-site/commit/c93f74f4a622f3810f0feeb002834db80a13bb78
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC4
Posted by Shubham Chaudhary <sh...@gmail.com>.
+1 SUCCESS! [0:40:49.312888]
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 7:16 PM Stefan Vodita <st...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thank you Chris!
>
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 at 01:43, Chris Hegarty
> <ch...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>> > On 11 Oct 2024, at 08:09, Stefan Vodita <st...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > No worries at all Chris, I didn't know we could retroactively
>> > edit the release notes for 9.12. I've gone ahead and added
>> > an entry for the aggregation engine.
>>
>> I’ve taken the update that you made to the draft notes on the wiki, and
>> updated the website [1].
>>
>> You can see Match-time aggregation engine now listed under the new
>> features section of the 9.12.0 release announcement. See,
>>
>> https://lucene.apache.org/core/corenews.html#apache-lucenetm-9120-available
>>
>> -Chris.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-site/commit/c93f74f4a622f3810f0feeb002834db80a13bb78
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC4
Posted by Stefan Vodita <st...@gmail.com>.
Thank you Chris!
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 at 01:43, Chris Hegarty
<ch...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> > On 11 Oct 2024, at 08:09, Stefan Vodita <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > No worries at all Chris, I didn't know we could retroactively
> > edit the release notes for 9.12. I've gone ahead and added
> > an entry for the aggregation engine.
>
> I’ve taken the update that you made to the draft notes on the wiki, and
> updated the website [1].
>
> You can see Match-time aggregation engine now listed under the new
> features section of the 9.12.0 release announcement. See,
> https://lucene.apache.org/core/corenews.html#apache-lucenetm-9120-available
>
> -Chris.
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-site/commit/c93f74f4a622f3810f0feeb002834db80a13bb78
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC4
Posted by Ignacio Vera <iv...@gmail.com>.
+1
SUCCESS! [1:04:06.286446]
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 9:43 AM Chris Hegarty
<ch...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote:
>
> Hi Stefan,
>
> > On 11 Oct 2024, at 08:09, Stefan Vodita <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > No worries at all Chris, I didn't know we could retroactively
> > edit the release notes for 9.12. I've gone ahead and added
> > an entry for the aggregation engine.
>
> I’ve taken the update that you made to the draft notes on the wiki, and updated the website [1].
>
> You can see Match-time aggregation engine now listed under the new features section of the 9.12.0 release announcement. See,
> https://lucene.apache.org/core/corenews.html#apache-lucenetm-9120-available
>
> -Chris.
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/lucene-site/commit/c93f74f4a622f3810f0feeb002834db80a13bb78
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC4
Posted by Chris Hegarty <ch...@elastic.co.INVALID>.
Hi Stefan,
> On 11 Oct 2024, at 08:09, Stefan Vodita <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> No worries at all Chris, I didn't know we could retroactively
> edit the release notes for 9.12. I've gone ahead and added
> an entry for the aggregation engine.
I’ve taken the update that you made to the draft notes on the wiki, and updated the website [1].
You can see Match-time aggregation engine now listed under the new features section of the 9.12.0 release announcement. See,
https://lucene.apache.org/core/corenews.html#apache-lucenetm-9120-available
-Chris.
[1] https://github.com/apache/lucene-site/commit/c93f74f4a622f3810f0feeb002834db80a13bb78
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC4
Posted by Stefan Vodita <st...@gmail.com>.
No worries at all Chris, I didn't know we could retroactively
edit the release notes for 9.12. I've gone ahead and added
an entry for the aggregation engine.
Thank you,
Stefan
On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 at 09:56, Chris Hegarty
<ch...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> > On 10 Oct 2024, at 16:41, Stefan Vodita <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > We didn't mention the new aggregation engine [1] in the release notes
> for 9.12
> > and that seems like a missed opportunity. It's a significant change,
> which
> > improves over the existing faceting functionality in terms of
> flexibility and
> > performance.
>
> Well… that’s on me. As release manager for 9.12, I overlooked this as a
> significant feature. We can add it to the 9.12 release highlights if you
> think it worth it now.
>
> -Chris.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC4
Posted by Chris Hegarty <ch...@elastic.co.INVALID>.
Hi Stefan,
> On 10 Oct 2024, at 16:41, Stefan Vodita <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> We didn't mention the new aggregation engine [1] in the release notes for 9.12
> and that seems like a missed opportunity. It's a significant change, which
> improves over the existing faceting functionality in terms of flexibility and
> performance.
Well… that’s on me. As release manager for 9.12, I overlooked this as a significant feature. We can add it to the 9.12 release highlights if you think it worth it now.
-Chris.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC4
Posted by Michael Sokolov <ms...@gmail.com>.
+1
SUCCESS! [1:25:19.133719]
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 9:42 AM Stefan Vodita <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 SUCCESS! [0:35:35.851448]
>
> We didn't mention the new aggregation engine [1] in the release notes for 9.12
> and that seems like a missed opportunity. It's a significant change, which
> improves over the existing faceting functionality in terms of flexibility and
> performance.
>
> What do we think about mentioning it in the 10.0.0 release notes with a
> disclaimer that it's actually been out since 9.12?
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13568
>
> On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 at 01:26, Luca Cavanna <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Please vote for release candidate 4 for Lucene 10.0.0
>>
>> I published a draft of the release notes at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0 . Feedback is welcome. Feel free to edit directly.
>>
>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>>
>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>
>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2024-10-13 08:00 UTC.
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> Here is my +1
>>
>> SUCCESS! [0:59:11.080740]
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC4
Posted by Stefan Vodita <st...@gmail.com>.
+1 SUCCESS! [0:35:35.851448]
We didn't mention the new aggregation engine [1
<https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13568>] in the release notes for 9.12
and that seems like a missed opportunity. It's a significant change, which
improves over the existing faceting functionality in terms of flexibility
and
performance.
What do we think about mentioning it in the 10.0.0 release notes with a
disclaimer that it's actually been out since 9.12?
[1] https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13568
On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 at 01:26, Luca Cavanna <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> Please vote for release candidate 4 for Lucene 10.0.0
>
> I published a draft of the release notes at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0 .
> Feedback is welcome. Feel free to edit directly.
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2024-10-13 08:00
> UTC.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Here is my +1
>
> SUCCESS! [0:59:11.080740]
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC4
Posted by Tomás Fernández Löbbe <to...@gmail.com>.
+1
SUCCESS! [1:07:20.700731]
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 7:03 AM Chris Hegarty
<ch...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote:
> +1
>
> SUCCESS! [3:08:50.803948]
>
> I ran the smoktester with JDK 21.0.x, 22.0.x, and 23. Hence the long run
> time :-)
>
> -Chris.
>
> > On 10 Oct 2024, at 08:24, Luca Cavanna <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Please vote for release candidate 4 for Lucene 10.0.0
> >
> > I published a draft of the release notes at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0 .
> Feedback is welcome. Feel free to edit directly.
> >
> > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
> >
> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> >
> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2024-10-13 08:00
> UTC.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Here is my +1
> >
> > SUCCESS! [0:59:11.080740]
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC4
Posted by Chris Hegarty <ch...@elastic.co.INVALID>.
+1
SUCCESS! [3:08:50.803948]
I ran the smoktester with JDK 21.0.x, 22.0.x, and 23. Hence the long run time :-)
-Chris.
> On 10 Oct 2024, at 08:24, Luca Cavanna <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Please vote for release candidate 4 for Lucene 10.0.0
>
> I published a draft of the release notes at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0 . Feedback is welcome. Feel free to edit directly.
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2024-10-13 08:00 UTC.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Here is my +1
>
> SUCCESS! [0:59:11.080740]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC4
Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
+1
SUCCESS! [0:18:16.706133]
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 1:26 AM Luca Cavanna <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> Please vote for release candidate 4 for Lucene 10.0.0
>
> I published a draft of the release notes at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0 .
> Feedback is welcome. Feel free to edit directly.
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2024-10-13 08:00
> UTC.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Here is my +1
>
> SUCCESS! [0:59:11.080740]
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC4
Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.
I just realized that my email got sent today :)
It was in the outbox but guess I just didn't connect to the internet,
delaying the sending.
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 11:21 AM Luca Cavanna <lu...@elastic.co.invalid>
wrote:
> Hey Anshum,
> thanks for casting your vote!
>
> This vote is closed, Lucene 10 has been released ;) I sent a vote
> summary to the list earlier today, perhaps I should have been more
> explicit in this thread too. Sorry if that caused confusion.
>
> Cheers
> Luca
>
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 7:48 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > SUCCESS! [0:41:46.212386]
> >
> > Ran the smoke tester and some sample test code. All looks good.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 12:25 AM Luca Cavanna <ja...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Please vote for release candidate 4 for Lucene 10.0.0
> >>
> >> I published a draft of the release notes at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0 .
> Feedback is welcome. Feel free to edit directly.
> >>
> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
> >>
> >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> >>
> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
> >>
> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2024-10-13 08:00
> UTC.
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 approve
> >> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >>
> >> Here is my +1
> >>
> >> SUCCESS! [0:59:11.080740]
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Anshum Gupta
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
--
Anshum Gupta
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC4
Posted by Luca Cavanna <lu...@elastic.co.INVALID>.
Hey Anshum,
thanks for casting your vote!
This vote is closed, Lucene 10 has been released ;) I sent a vote
summary to the list earlier today, perhaps I should have been more
explicit in this thread too. Sorry if that caused confusion.
Cheers
Luca
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 7:48 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> SUCCESS! [0:41:46.212386]
>
> Ran the smoke tester and some sample test code. All looks good.
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 12:25 AM Luca Cavanna <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Please vote for release candidate 4 for Lucene 10.0.0
>>
>> I published a draft of the release notes at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0 . Feedback is welcome. Feel free to edit directly.
>>
>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>>
>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>
>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2024-10-13 08:00 UTC.
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> Here is my +1
>>
>> SUCCESS! [0:59:11.080740]
>>
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC4
Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.
+1 (binding)
SUCCESS! [0:41:46.212386]
Ran the smoke tester and some sample test code. All looks good.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 12:25 AM Luca Cavanna <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> Please vote for release candidate 4 for Lucene 10.0.0
>
> I published a draft of the release notes at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+10.0.0 .
> Feedback is welcome. Feel free to edit directly.
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-10.0.0-RC4-rev-eadc07cc6a17f9cfea81f3e82ec06164014232fb
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2024-10-13 08:00
> UTC.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Here is my +1
>
> SUCCESS! [0:59:11.080740]
>
>
--
Anshum Gupta