You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@parquet.apache.org by Andrew Lamb <an...@gmail.com> on 2024/05/11 18:52:25 UTC
[DISCUSS] Propose changing the default branch of the parquet-site repo
Hello,
I would like to propose changing the default branch of the parquet-site
repo from `asf-site` to `production`
The `asf-site` branch hosts the static files of the site (aka what is built
from the source in the `development` branch). Thus since it is the default
branch that is what appears when people open the parquet-site[1] repo
I made a PR to update the readme in the asf-site branch[2] but I think it
would be better if we changed the default branch to production. This
requires an INFRA JIRA ticket[2], which I am happy to file, but wanted to
discuss here first.
Andrew Lamb
(Apache DataFusion/Arrow PMC, ASF member)
p.s. my not-so-secret agenda is to improve the adoption of the parquet
file format by helping with communication and coordination. The
parquet.apache.org website plays a key role in this, and thus I want to
help lower the barrier to help maintain (and update) it.
[1]: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site
[2]: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/57
[2]:
https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-asfyaml?tab=readme-ov-file#default_branch
Re: [DISCUSS] Propose changing the default branch of the parquet-site repo
Posted by Andrew Lamb <an...@gmail.com>.
I have filed an issue[1] with this request
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-25801
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 6:54 PM Julien Le Dem <ju...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 4:15 AM Andrew Lamb <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I plan to wait until next week to allow any one else who has an opinion
> to
> > share it here and then assuming no objections will file a ticket with ASF
> > Infra.
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> > On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 3:57 AM Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Sun, May 12, 2024, at 9:31 AM, Gang Wu wrote:
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > This makes sense. I was also confused when I had access to
> > > > parquet-site for the first time.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Andrew!
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Gang
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 3:15 AM Vinoo Ganesh <vinoo.ganesh@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +1, this would be great. It's something Xinli and I discussed when
> we
> > > first
> > > >> made the website updates, but it ended up falling off of the list.
> It
> > > would
> > > >> be great to have this updated.
> > > >>
> > > >> <Vi...@gmail.com>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 8:52 PM Andrew Lamb <andrewlamb11@gmail.com
> >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hello,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I would like to propose changing the default branch of the
> > > parquet-site
> > > >> > repo from `asf-site` to `production`
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The `asf-site` branch hosts the static files of the site (aka what
> > is
> > > >> built
> > > >> > from the source in the `development` branch). Thus since it is the
> > > >> default
> > > >> > branch that is what appears when people open the parquet-site[1]
> > repo
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I made a PR to update the readme in the asf-site branch[2] but I
> > > think it
> > > >> > would be better if we changed the default branch to production.
> This
> > > >> > requires an INFRA JIRA ticket[2], which I am happy to file, but
> > > wanted to
> > > >> > discuss here first.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Andrew Lamb
> > > >> > (Apache DataFusion/Arrow PMC, ASF member)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > p.s. my not-so-secret agenda is to improve the adoption of the
> > > parquet
> > > >> > file format by helping with communication and coordination. The
> > > >> > parquet.apache.org website plays a key role in this, and thus I
> > want
> > > to
> > > >> > help lower the barrier to help maintain (and update) it.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [1]: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site
> > > >> > [2]: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/57
> > > >> > [2]:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-asfyaml?tab=readme-ov-file#default_branch
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Propose changing the default branch of the parquet-site repo
Posted by Julien Le Dem <ju...@apache.org>.
+1
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 4:15 AM Andrew Lamb <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I plan to wait until next week to allow any one else who has an opinion to
> share it here and then assuming no objections will file a ticket with ASF
> Infra.
>
> Andrew
>
> On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 3:57 AM Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Sun, May 12, 2024, at 9:31 AM, Gang Wu wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > This makes sense. I was also confused when I had access to
> > > parquet-site for the first time.
> > >
> > > Thanks Andrew!
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Gang
> > >
> > > On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 3:15 AM Vinoo Ganesh <vi...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1, this would be great. It's something Xinli and I discussed when we
> > first
> > >> made the website updates, but it ended up falling off of the list. It
> > would
> > >> be great to have this updated.
> > >>
> > >> <Vi...@gmail.com>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 8:52 PM Andrew Lamb <an...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hello,
> > >> >
> > >> > I would like to propose changing the default branch of the
> > parquet-site
> > >> > repo from `asf-site` to `production`
> > >> >
> > >> > The `asf-site` branch hosts the static files of the site (aka what
> is
> > >> built
> > >> > from the source in the `development` branch). Thus since it is the
> > >> default
> > >> > branch that is what appears when people open the parquet-site[1]
> repo
> > >> >
> > >> > I made a PR to update the readme in the asf-site branch[2] but I
> > think it
> > >> > would be better if we changed the default branch to production. This
> > >> > requires an INFRA JIRA ticket[2], which I am happy to file, but
> > wanted to
> > >> > discuss here first.
> > >> >
> > >> > Andrew Lamb
> > >> > (Apache DataFusion/Arrow PMC, ASF member)
> > >> >
> > >> > p.s. my not-so-secret agenda is to improve the adoption of the
> > parquet
> > >> > file format by helping with communication and coordination. The
> > >> > parquet.apache.org website plays a key role in this, and thus I
> want
> > to
> > >> > help lower the barrier to help maintain (and update) it.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > [1]: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site
> > >> > [2]: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/57
> > >> > [2]:
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-asfyaml?tab=readme-ov-file#default_branch
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Propose changing the default branch of the parquet-site repo
Posted by Andrew Lamb <an...@gmail.com>.
I plan to wait until next week to allow any one else who has an opinion to
share it here and then assuming no objections will file a ticket with ASF
Infra.
Andrew
On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 3:57 AM Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sun, May 12, 2024, at 9:31 AM, Gang Wu wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > This makes sense. I was also confused when I had access to
> > parquet-site for the first time.
> >
> > Thanks Andrew!
> >
> > Best,
> > Gang
> >
> > On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 3:15 AM Vinoo Ganesh <vi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> +1, this would be great. It's something Xinli and I discussed when we
> first
> >> made the website updates, but it ended up falling off of the list. It
> would
> >> be great to have this updated.
> >>
> >> <Vi...@gmail.com>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 8:52 PM Andrew Lamb <an...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> > I would like to propose changing the default branch of the
> parquet-site
> >> > repo from `asf-site` to `production`
> >> >
> >> > The `asf-site` branch hosts the static files of the site (aka what is
> >> built
> >> > from the source in the `development` branch). Thus since it is the
> >> default
> >> > branch that is what appears when people open the parquet-site[1] repo
> >> >
> >> > I made a PR to update the readme in the asf-site branch[2] but I
> think it
> >> > would be better if we changed the default branch to production. This
> >> > requires an INFRA JIRA ticket[2], which I am happy to file, but
> wanted to
> >> > discuss here first.
> >> >
> >> > Andrew Lamb
> >> > (Apache DataFusion/Arrow PMC, ASF member)
> >> >
> >> > p.s. my not-so-secret agenda is to improve the adoption of the
> parquet
> >> > file format by helping with communication and coordination. The
> >> > parquet.apache.org website plays a key role in this, and thus I want
> to
> >> > help lower the barrier to help maintain (and update) it.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > [1]: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site
> >> > [2]: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/57
> >> > [2]:
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-asfyaml?tab=readme-ov-file#default_branch
> >> >
> >>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Propose changing the default branch of the parquet-site repo
Posted by "Uwe L. Korn" <uw...@xhochy.com>.
+1
On Sun, May 12, 2024, at 9:31 AM, Gang Wu wrote:
> +1
>
> This makes sense. I was also confused when I had access to
> parquet-site for the first time.
>
> Thanks Andrew!
>
> Best,
> Gang
>
> On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 3:15 AM Vinoo Ganesh <vi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1, this would be great. It's something Xinli and I discussed when we first
>> made the website updates, but it ended up falling off of the list. It would
>> be great to have this updated.
>>
>> <Vi...@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 8:52 PM Andrew Lamb <an...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I would like to propose changing the default branch of the parquet-site
>> > repo from `asf-site` to `production`
>> >
>> > The `asf-site` branch hosts the static files of the site (aka what is
>> built
>> > from the source in the `development` branch). Thus since it is the
>> default
>> > branch that is what appears when people open the parquet-site[1] repo
>> >
>> > I made a PR to update the readme in the asf-site branch[2] but I think it
>> > would be better if we changed the default branch to production. This
>> > requires an INFRA JIRA ticket[2], which I am happy to file, but wanted to
>> > discuss here first.
>> >
>> > Andrew Lamb
>> > (Apache DataFusion/Arrow PMC, ASF member)
>> >
>> > p.s. my not-so-secret agenda is to improve the adoption of the parquet
>> > file format by helping with communication and coordination. The
>> > parquet.apache.org website plays a key role in this, and thus I want to
>> > help lower the barrier to help maintain (and update) it.
>> >
>> >
>> > [1]: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site
>> > [2]: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/57
>> > [2]:
>> >
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-asfyaml?tab=readme-ov-file#default_branch
>> >
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Propose changing the default branch of the parquet-site repo
Posted by Gang Wu <us...@gmail.com>.
+1
This makes sense. I was also confused when I had access to
parquet-site for the first time.
Thanks Andrew!
Best,
Gang
On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 3:15 AM Vinoo Ganesh <vi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1, this would be great. It's something Xinli and I discussed when we first
> made the website updates, but it ended up falling off of the list. It would
> be great to have this updated.
>
> <Vi...@gmail.com>
>
>
> On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 8:52 PM Andrew Lamb <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to propose changing the default branch of the parquet-site
> > repo from `asf-site` to `production`
> >
> > The `asf-site` branch hosts the static files of the site (aka what is
> built
> > from the source in the `development` branch). Thus since it is the
> default
> > branch that is what appears when people open the parquet-site[1] repo
> >
> > I made a PR to update the readme in the asf-site branch[2] but I think it
> > would be better if we changed the default branch to production. This
> > requires an INFRA JIRA ticket[2], which I am happy to file, but wanted to
> > discuss here first.
> >
> > Andrew Lamb
> > (Apache DataFusion/Arrow PMC, ASF member)
> >
> > p.s. my not-so-secret agenda is to improve the adoption of the parquet
> > file format by helping with communication and coordination. The
> > parquet.apache.org website plays a key role in this, and thus I want to
> > help lower the barrier to help maintain (and update) it.
> >
> >
> > [1]: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site
> > [2]: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/57
> > [2]:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-asfyaml?tab=readme-ov-file#default_branch
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Propose changing the default branch of the parquet-site repo
Posted by Vinoo Ganesh <vi...@gmail.com>.
+1, this would be great. It's something Xinli and I discussed when we first
made the website updates, but it ended up falling off of the list. It would
be great to have this updated.
<Vi...@gmail.com>
On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 8:52 PM Andrew Lamb <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to propose changing the default branch of the parquet-site
> repo from `asf-site` to `production`
>
> The `asf-site` branch hosts the static files of the site (aka what is built
> from the source in the `development` branch). Thus since it is the default
> branch that is what appears when people open the parquet-site[1] repo
>
> I made a PR to update the readme in the asf-site branch[2] but I think it
> would be better if we changed the default branch to production. This
> requires an INFRA JIRA ticket[2], which I am happy to file, but wanted to
> discuss here first.
>
> Andrew Lamb
> (Apache DataFusion/Arrow PMC, ASF member)
>
> p.s. my not-so-secret agenda is to improve the adoption of the parquet
> file format by helping with communication and coordination. The
> parquet.apache.org website plays a key role in this, and thus I want to
> help lower the barrier to help maintain (and update) it.
>
>
> [1]: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site
> [2]: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/57
> [2]:
>
> https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-asfyaml?tab=readme-ov-file#default_branch
>