You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@nifi.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2019/03/12 19:28:11 UTC

[GitHub] [nifi] markap14 edited a comment on issue #3351: NIFI-2933 Remote input/output ports at any PG

markap14 edited a comment on issue #3351: NIFI-2933 Remote input/output ports at any PG
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3351#issuecomment-472147302
 
 
   @ijokarumawak sounds good. Though I think rather than a checkbox in the UI indicating whether or not we allow Remote Access... I would lean more toward a drop-down that allows user to choose the type of port: 'Local Port' vs 'Site to Site Port'.
   
   I also agree that the port terminology is getting a big confusing. I wonder if we should rename `RemotePort` to `RemoteGroupPort`. And then we can probably get rid of `RootGroupPort` all together and instead just have `LocalPort` and `SiteToSitePort` (or whatever we want to call it). The RootGroupPort really was meant to differentiate between a local port and one that is capable of performance site-to-site functions. So I think it makes sense to instead just use that sort of terminology, no?

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services