You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hive.apache.org by "Vaibhav Gumashta (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/03/15 07:06:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (HIVE-21451) ACID: Avoid using hive.acid.key.index to determine if the file is original or not

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-21451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Vaibhav Gumashta updated HIVE-21451:
------------------------------------
    Issue Type: Sub-task  (was: Bug)
        Parent: HIVE-20699

> ACID: Avoid using hive.acid.key.index to determine if the file is original or not
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-21451
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-21451
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Transactions
>    Affects Versions: 3.1.1
>            Reporter: Vaibhav Gumashta
>            Priority: Major
>
> The transactional files written in hive have each row decorated with ROW__ID column. However, when we bring in files using LOAD DATA... command to the transactional tables, they do not have these metadata columns (in Hive ACID parlance, these are called original files). These original files are decorated with an inferred ROW__ID generated while reading these. However, after these are compacted, the ROW__ID metadata column, becomes part of the file itself.
> To determine if a file is original or not, currently we use check for the presence of hive.acid.key.index. For query based compaction, currently we do not write hive.acid.key.index (HIVE-21165). This means, there is a possibility that that even after compaction, they get treated as original files.
> Irrespective of HIVE-21165, we should avoid hive.acid.key.index to decide whether the file is original or not, and instead look for the presence of ROW__ID to do that. hive.acid.key.index should be treated as a performance optimization, as it was seemingly meant to be.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)