You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Sakthi <sa...@gmail.com> on 2019/01/29 19:17:15 UTC
HBase Website Cleanup task
Hello all,
The most recent (and many of the previous) "*HBase Website Link Checker*"
job of ours has reported several issues with the website. The job takes
roughly 20+ hours to finish and has reported "*1458 missing files*" and "*7143
missing named anchors*".
*Quick facts:* Of the 1400+ missing files issues, around 1200 are from 1.2,
90 from 0.94, 40 from 2.0, 30 from 2.1 and rest from the master.
I have filed an *Umbrella JIRA:* HBASE-21803
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21803> ("HBase Website
Cleanup"). If folks find any other website related issues that we would
like to address, we can use this umbrella to track it.
Any suggestions are welcome!
Regards,
Sakthi
Re: HBase Website Cleanup task
Posted by Peter Somogyi <ps...@apache.org>.
I haven't found any simple way how we could add canonical links to javadoc.
It is difficult to achieve because the content needs to be compared between
versions and canonical link is only applicable when the these are
identical. Moving classes to different packages from version A to B
introduces additional complexity. I created HBASE-21869 to track this work.
Regarding the 0.94 removal I created a PR to hbase-site repository with new
.htaccess rules. See: https://github.com/apache/hbase-site/pull/1
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 3:40 PM Misty Linville <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
> For 0.94 files we should add a permanent redirect to htaccess manually. For
> the rest we should modify the javadoc template to add the correct metadata
> for older branches. There is probably a way to pass arguments to the
> javadoc command and maybe that could be toggled on or off depending on
> whether we were building the latest or not. You’ll need to look up the
> actual syntax you need and how to achieve it in the template. We should
> avoid modifying generated content manually so we don’t blow our hashes in
> released bundles.
>
> Before you do any of this, please outline at least a rough plan so we can
> help spot problems. :)
>
> Misty
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 4:44 AM Peter Somogyi <ps...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > That's a very good point Nick!
> >
> > I'd know how we could add rel=canonical tag to 0.94 pages if we remove
> > those. Also, how could we add this tag to generated javadoc files (e.g.
> > canonical link between 1.4 and 3.0 javadoc)? I did not find any solutions
> > online to automate this process.
> > What we can do is to add a redirect rule to .htaccess with something like
> > this:
> >
> > RedirectMatch permanent ^/0.94/(.*)$ /$1
> >
> > I think it could work for most of the links. An example:
> >
> >
> https://hbase.apache.org/devapidocs/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/HTable.html
> >
> >
> https://hbase.apache.org/0.94/devapidocs/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/HTable.html
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 3:58 AM Misty Linville <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > We should add rel=canonical info to all the headers and always point to
> > the
> > > latest as canonical.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 2:56 PM William Shen <
> willshen@marinsoftware.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > If we are concerned about SEO, we should try to set up 301 Redirect
> to
> > > the
> > > > latest doc when we remove 0.94. That should alleviate some of the
> > > problems
> > > > with users landing on dead links. Over time the result should adjust,
> > or
> > > we
> > > > could set up Google Search Console for HBase site, and trigger a
> > reindex.
> > > > Not sure if we have someone already owning the SEO aspect of the
> site.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 2:52 PM Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > My only concern is that all my searches targeting our user guide
> land
> > > in
> > > > > 0.94 docs. I don't know why the SEO lands us thusly, but I fear
> that
> > > > > suddenly it'll look to user searches like the project is dead.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 11:46 AM Misty Linville <mi...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:04 AM Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sounds good by me.
> > > > > > > S
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 7:40 AM Peter Somogyi <
> > psomogyi@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Does anyone have any concern with removing 0.94 documentation
> > > > > > completely
> > > > > > > > from hbase.apache.org? Currently it is hosted at
> > > > > > > > https://hbase.apache.org/0.94/ to which we don't have any
> > direct
> > > > > link
> > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > with a few hops a user can reach this area. This release is
> > > almost
> > > > 4
> > > > > > > years
> > > > > > > > old!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I had a chat with Sean Busbey and he mentioned 0.94 could be
> > > > removed
> > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > the site and we could send a NOTICE to user@ that the
> > > > documentation
> > > > > > can
> > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > found in the final 0.94 tarball in case anyone still need it.
> > The
> > > > > > > > tarball[1] has the same content in docs directory.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > What do you think?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Peter
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [1] http://archive.apache.org/dist/hbase/hbase-0.94.27/
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:18 PM Sakthi <
> > > > sakthivel.azhaku@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > FYI: This is the job I'm talking about:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Website%20Link%20Checker/
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > Sakthi
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:17 AM Sakthi <
> > > > > sakthivel.azhaku@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hello all,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The most recent (and many of the previous) "*HBase
> Website
> > > Link
> > > > > > > > Checker*"
> > > > > > > > > > job of ours has reported several issues with the website.
> > The
> > > > job
> > > > > > > takes
> > > > > > > > > > roughly 20+ hours to finish and has reported "*1458
> missing
> > > > > files*"
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > "*7143
> > > > > > > > > > missing named anchors*".
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > *Quick facts:* Of the 1400+ missing files issues, around
> > 1200
> > > > are
> > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > > 1.2, 90 from 0.94, 40 from 2.0, 30 from 2.1 and rest from
> > the
> > > > > > master.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I have filed an *Umbrella JIRA:* HBASE-21803
> > > > > > > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21803>
> > ("HBase
> > > > > > Website
> > > > > > > > > > Cleanup"). If folks find any other website related issues
> > > that
> > > > we
> > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > > > like to address, we can use this umbrella to track it.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions are welcome!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > Sakthi
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: HBase Website Cleanup task
Posted by Misty Linville <mi...@apache.org>.
For 0.94 files we should add a permanent redirect to htaccess manually. For
the rest we should modify the javadoc template to add the correct metadata
for older branches. There is probably a way to pass arguments to the
javadoc command and maybe that could be toggled on or off depending on
whether we were building the latest or not. You’ll need to look up the
actual syntax you need and how to achieve it in the template. We should
avoid modifying generated content manually so we don’t blow our hashes in
released bundles.
Before you do any of this, please outline at least a rough plan so we can
help spot problems. :)
Misty
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 4:44 AM Peter Somogyi <ps...@apache.org> wrote:
> That's a very good point Nick!
>
> I'd know how we could add rel=canonical tag to 0.94 pages if we remove
> those. Also, how could we add this tag to generated javadoc files (e.g.
> canonical link between 1.4 and 3.0 javadoc)? I did not find any solutions
> online to automate this process.
> What we can do is to add a redirect rule to .htaccess with something like
> this:
>
> RedirectMatch permanent ^/0.94/(.*)$ /$1
>
> I think it could work for most of the links. An example:
>
> https://hbase.apache.org/devapidocs/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/HTable.html
>
> https://hbase.apache.org/0.94/devapidocs/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/HTable.html
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 3:58 AM Misty Linville <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > We should add rel=canonical info to all the headers and always point to
> the
> > latest as canonical.
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 2:56 PM William Shen <wi...@marinsoftware.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > If we are concerned about SEO, we should try to set up 301 Redirect to
> > the
> > > latest doc when we remove 0.94. That should alleviate some of the
> > problems
> > > with users landing on dead links. Over time the result should adjust,
> or
> > we
> > > could set up Google Search Console for HBase site, and trigger a
> reindex.
> > > Not sure if we have someone already owning the SEO aspect of the site.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 2:52 PM Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > My only concern is that all my searches targeting our user guide land
> > in
> > > > 0.94 docs. I don't know why the SEO lands us thusly, but I fear that
> > > > suddenly it'll look to user searches like the project is dead.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 11:46 AM Misty Linville <mi...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:04 AM Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Sounds good by me.
> > > > > > S
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 7:40 AM Peter Somogyi <
> psomogyi@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Does anyone have any concern with removing 0.94 documentation
> > > > > completely
> > > > > > > from hbase.apache.org? Currently it is hosted at
> > > > > > > https://hbase.apache.org/0.94/ to which we don't have any
> direct
> > > > link
> > > > > > but
> > > > > > > with a few hops a user can reach this area. This release is
> > almost
> > > 4
> > > > > > years
> > > > > > > old!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I had a chat with Sean Busbey and he mentioned 0.94 could be
> > > removed
> > > > > from
> > > > > > > the site and we could send a NOTICE to user@ that the
> > > documentation
> > > > > can
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > > found in the final 0.94 tarball in case anyone still need it.
> The
> > > > > > > tarball[1] has the same content in docs directory.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What do you think?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Peter
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1] http://archive.apache.org/dist/hbase/hbase-0.94.27/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:18 PM Sakthi <
> > > sakthivel.azhaku@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > FYI: This is the job I'm talking about:
> > > > > > > >
> > https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Website%20Link%20Checker/
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > Sakthi
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:17 AM Sakthi <
> > > > sakthivel.azhaku@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hello all,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The most recent (and many of the previous) "*HBase Website
> > Link
> > > > > > > Checker*"
> > > > > > > > > job of ours has reported several issues with the website.
> The
> > > job
> > > > > > takes
> > > > > > > > > roughly 20+ hours to finish and has reported "*1458 missing
> > > > files*"
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > "*7143
> > > > > > > > > missing named anchors*".
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > *Quick facts:* Of the 1400+ missing files issues, around
> 1200
> > > are
> > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > 1.2, 90 from 0.94, 40 from 2.0, 30 from 2.1 and rest from
> the
> > > > > master.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I have filed an *Umbrella JIRA:* HBASE-21803
> > > > > > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21803>
> ("HBase
> > > > > Website
> > > > > > > > > Cleanup"). If folks find any other website related issues
> > that
> > > we
> > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > > like to address, we can use this umbrella to track it.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Any suggestions are welcome!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > Sakthi
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: HBase Website Cleanup task
Posted by Peter Somogyi <ps...@apache.org>.
That's a very good point Nick!
I'd know how we could add rel=canonical tag to 0.94 pages if we remove
those. Also, how could we add this tag to generated javadoc files (e.g.
canonical link between 1.4 and 3.0 javadoc)? I did not find any solutions
online to automate this process.
What we can do is to add a redirect rule to .htaccess with something like
this:
RedirectMatch permanent ^/0.94/(.*)$ /$1
I think it could work for most of the links. An example:
https://hbase.apache.org/devapidocs/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/HTable.html
https://hbase.apache.org/0.94/devapidocs/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/HTable.html
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 3:58 AM Misty Linville <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
> We should add rel=canonical info to all the headers and always point to the
> latest as canonical.
>
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 2:56 PM William Shen <wi...@marinsoftware.com>
> wrote:
>
> > If we are concerned about SEO, we should try to set up 301 Redirect to
> the
> > latest doc when we remove 0.94. That should alleviate some of the
> problems
> > with users landing on dead links. Over time the result should adjust, or
> we
> > could set up Google Search Console for HBase site, and trigger a reindex.
> > Not sure if we have someone already owning the SEO aspect of the site.
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 2:52 PM Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > My only concern is that all my searches targeting our user guide land
> in
> > > 0.94 docs. I don't know why the SEO lands us thusly, but I fear that
> > > suddenly it'll look to user searches like the project is dead.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 11:46 AM Misty Linville <mi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:04 AM Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Sounds good by me.
> > > > > S
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 7:40 AM Peter Somogyi <ps...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Does anyone have any concern with removing 0.94 documentation
> > > > completely
> > > > > > from hbase.apache.org? Currently it is hosted at
> > > > > > https://hbase.apache.org/0.94/ to which we don't have any direct
> > > link
> > > > > but
> > > > > > with a few hops a user can reach this area. This release is
> almost
> > 4
> > > > > years
> > > > > > old!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I had a chat with Sean Busbey and he mentioned 0.94 could be
> > removed
> > > > from
> > > > > > the site and we could send a NOTICE to user@ that the
> > documentation
> > > > can
> > > > > be
> > > > > > found in the final 0.94 tarball in case anyone still need it. The
> > > > > > tarball[1] has the same content in docs directory.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What do you think?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Peter
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1] http://archive.apache.org/dist/hbase/hbase-0.94.27/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:18 PM Sakthi <
> > sakthivel.azhaku@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > FYI: This is the job I'm talking about:
> > > > > > >
> https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Website%20Link%20Checker/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Sakthi
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:17 AM Sakthi <
> > > sakthivel.azhaku@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hello all,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The most recent (and many of the previous) "*HBase Website
> Link
> > > > > > Checker*"
> > > > > > > > job of ours has reported several issues with the website. The
> > job
> > > > > takes
> > > > > > > > roughly 20+ hours to finish and has reported "*1458 missing
> > > files*"
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > "*7143
> > > > > > > > missing named anchors*".
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > *Quick facts:* Of the 1400+ missing files issues, around 1200
> > are
> > > > > from
> > > > > > > > 1.2, 90 from 0.94, 40 from 2.0, 30 from 2.1 and rest from the
> > > > master.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I have filed an *Umbrella JIRA:* HBASE-21803
> > > > > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21803> ("HBase
> > > > Website
> > > > > > > > Cleanup"). If folks find any other website related issues
> that
> > we
> > > > > would
> > > > > > > > like to address, we can use this umbrella to track it.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Any suggestions are welcome!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > Sakthi
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: HBase Website Cleanup task
Posted by Misty Linville <mi...@apache.org>.
We should add rel=canonical info to all the headers and always point to the
latest as canonical.
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 2:56 PM William Shen <wi...@marinsoftware.com>
wrote:
> If we are concerned about SEO, we should try to set up 301 Redirect to the
> latest doc when we remove 0.94. That should alleviate some of the problems
> with users landing on dead links. Over time the result should adjust, or we
> could set up Google Search Console for HBase site, and trigger a reindex.
> Not sure if we have someone already owning the SEO aspect of the site.
>
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 2:52 PM Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > My only concern is that all my searches targeting our user guide land in
> > 0.94 docs. I don't know why the SEO lands us thusly, but I fear that
> > suddenly it'll look to user searches like the project is dead.
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 11:46 AM Misty Linville <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:04 AM Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sounds good by me.
> > > > S
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 7:40 AM Peter Somogyi <ps...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Does anyone have any concern with removing 0.94 documentation
> > > completely
> > > > > from hbase.apache.org? Currently it is hosted at
> > > > > https://hbase.apache.org/0.94/ to which we don't have any direct
> > link
> > > > but
> > > > > with a few hops a user can reach this area. This release is almost
> 4
> > > > years
> > > > > old!
> > > > >
> > > > > I had a chat with Sean Busbey and he mentioned 0.94 could be
> removed
> > > from
> > > > > the site and we could send a NOTICE to user@ that the
> documentation
> > > can
> > > > be
> > > > > found in the final 0.94 tarball in case anyone still need it. The
> > > > > tarball[1] has the same content in docs directory.
> > > > >
> > > > > What do you think?
> > > > >
> > > > > Peter
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] http://archive.apache.org/dist/hbase/hbase-0.94.27/
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:18 PM Sakthi <
> sakthivel.azhaku@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > FYI: This is the job I'm talking about:
> > > > > > https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Website%20Link%20Checker/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Sakthi
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:17 AM Sakthi <
> > sakthivel.azhaku@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hello all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The most recent (and many of the previous) "*HBase Website Link
> > > > > Checker*"
> > > > > > > job of ours has reported several issues with the website. The
> job
> > > > takes
> > > > > > > roughly 20+ hours to finish and has reported "*1458 missing
> > files*"
> > > > and
> > > > > > "*7143
> > > > > > > missing named anchors*".
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > *Quick facts:* Of the 1400+ missing files issues, around 1200
> are
> > > > from
> > > > > > > 1.2, 90 from 0.94, 40 from 2.0, 30 from 2.1 and rest from the
> > > master.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have filed an *Umbrella JIRA:* HBASE-21803
> > > > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21803> ("HBase
> > > Website
> > > > > > > Cleanup"). If folks find any other website related issues that
> we
> > > > would
> > > > > > > like to address, we can use this umbrella to track it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Any suggestions are welcome!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Sakthi
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: HBase Website Cleanup task
Posted by William Shen <wi...@marinsoftware.com>.
If we are concerned about SEO, we should try to set up 301 Redirect to the
latest doc when we remove 0.94. That should alleviate some of the problems
with users landing on dead links. Over time the result should adjust, or we
could set up Google Search Console for HBase site, and trigger a reindex.
Not sure if we have someone already owning the SEO aspect of the site.
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 2:52 PM Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My only concern is that all my searches targeting our user guide land in
> 0.94 docs. I don't know why the SEO lands us thusly, but I fear that
> suddenly it'll look to user searches like the project is dead.
>
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 11:46 AM Misty Linville <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:04 AM Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Sounds good by me.
> > > S
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 7:40 AM Peter Somogyi <ps...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Does anyone have any concern with removing 0.94 documentation
> > completely
> > > > from hbase.apache.org? Currently it is hosted at
> > > > https://hbase.apache.org/0.94/ to which we don't have any direct
> link
> > > but
> > > > with a few hops a user can reach this area. This release is almost 4
> > > years
> > > > old!
> > > >
> > > > I had a chat with Sean Busbey and he mentioned 0.94 could be removed
> > from
> > > > the site and we could send a NOTICE to user@ that the documentation
> > can
> > > be
> > > > found in the final 0.94 tarball in case anyone still need it. The
> > > > tarball[1] has the same content in docs directory.
> > > >
> > > > What do you think?
> > > >
> > > > Peter
> > > >
> > > > [1] http://archive.apache.org/dist/hbase/hbase-0.94.27/
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:18 PM Sakthi <sa...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > FYI: This is the job I'm talking about:
> > > > > https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Website%20Link%20Checker/
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Sakthi
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:17 AM Sakthi <
> sakthivel.azhaku@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The most recent (and many of the previous) "*HBase Website Link
> > > > Checker*"
> > > > > > job of ours has reported several issues with the website. The job
> > > takes
> > > > > > roughly 20+ hours to finish and has reported "*1458 missing
> files*"
> > > and
> > > > > "*7143
> > > > > > missing named anchors*".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *Quick facts:* Of the 1400+ missing files issues, around 1200 are
> > > from
> > > > > > 1.2, 90 from 0.94, 40 from 2.0, 30 from 2.1 and rest from the
> > master.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have filed an *Umbrella JIRA:* HBASE-21803
> > > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21803> ("HBase
> > Website
> > > > > > Cleanup"). If folks find any other website related issues that we
> > > would
> > > > > > like to address, we can use this umbrella to track it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any suggestions are welcome!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Sakthi
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: HBase Website Cleanup task
Posted by Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com>.
My only concern is that all my searches targeting our user guide land in
0.94 docs. I don't know why the SEO lands us thusly, but I fear that
suddenly it'll look to user searches like the project is dead.
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 11:46 AM Misty Linville <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:04 AM Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > Sounds good by me.
> > S
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 7:40 AM Peter Somogyi <ps...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Does anyone have any concern with removing 0.94 documentation
> completely
> > > from hbase.apache.org? Currently it is hosted at
> > > https://hbase.apache.org/0.94/ to which we don't have any direct link
> > but
> > > with a few hops a user can reach this area. This release is almost 4
> > years
> > > old!
> > >
> > > I had a chat with Sean Busbey and he mentioned 0.94 could be removed
> from
> > > the site and we could send a NOTICE to user@ that the documentation
> can
> > be
> > > found in the final 0.94 tarball in case anyone still need it. The
> > > tarball[1] has the same content in docs directory.
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> > > Peter
> > >
> > > [1] http://archive.apache.org/dist/hbase/hbase-0.94.27/
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:18 PM Sakthi <sa...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > FYI: This is the job I'm talking about:
> > > > https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Website%20Link%20Checker/
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Sakthi
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:17 AM Sakthi <sa...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello all,
> > > > >
> > > > > The most recent (and many of the previous) "*HBase Website Link
> > > Checker*"
> > > > > job of ours has reported several issues with the website. The job
> > takes
> > > > > roughly 20+ hours to finish and has reported "*1458 missing files*"
> > and
> > > > "*7143
> > > > > missing named anchors*".
> > > > >
> > > > > *Quick facts:* Of the 1400+ missing files issues, around 1200 are
> > from
> > > > > 1.2, 90 from 0.94, 40 from 2.0, 30 from 2.1 and rest from the
> master.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have filed an *Umbrella JIRA:* HBASE-21803
> > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21803> ("HBase
> Website
> > > > > Cleanup"). If folks find any other website related issues that we
> > would
> > > > > like to address, we can use this umbrella to track it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Any suggestions are welcome!
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Sakthi
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: HBase Website Cleanup task
Posted by Misty Linville <mi...@apache.org>.
+1
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:04 AM Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> Sounds good by me.
> S
>
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 7:40 AM Peter Somogyi <ps...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Does anyone have any concern with removing 0.94 documentation completely
> > from hbase.apache.org? Currently it is hosted at
> > https://hbase.apache.org/0.94/ to which we don't have any direct link
> but
> > with a few hops a user can reach this area. This release is almost 4
> years
> > old!
> >
> > I had a chat with Sean Busbey and he mentioned 0.94 could be removed from
> > the site and we could send a NOTICE to user@ that the documentation can
> be
> > found in the final 0.94 tarball in case anyone still need it. The
> > tarball[1] has the same content in docs directory.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > [1] http://archive.apache.org/dist/hbase/hbase-0.94.27/
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:18 PM Sakthi <sa...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > FYI: This is the job I'm talking about:
> > > https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Website%20Link%20Checker/
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Sakthi
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:17 AM Sakthi <sa...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello all,
> > > >
> > > > The most recent (and many of the previous) "*HBase Website Link
> > Checker*"
> > > > job of ours has reported several issues with the website. The job
> takes
> > > > roughly 20+ hours to finish and has reported "*1458 missing files*"
> and
> > > "*7143
> > > > missing named anchors*".
> > > >
> > > > *Quick facts:* Of the 1400+ missing files issues, around 1200 are
> from
> > > > 1.2, 90 from 0.94, 40 from 2.0, 30 from 2.1 and rest from the master.
> > > >
> > > > I have filed an *Umbrella JIRA:* HBASE-21803
> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21803> ("HBase Website
> > > > Cleanup"). If folks find any other website related issues that we
> would
> > > > like to address, we can use this umbrella to track it.
> > > >
> > > > Any suggestions are welcome!
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Sakthi
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: HBase Website Cleanup task
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
Sounds good by me.
S
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 7:40 AM Peter Somogyi <ps...@apache.org> wrote:
> Does anyone have any concern with removing 0.94 documentation completely
> from hbase.apache.org? Currently it is hosted at
> https://hbase.apache.org/0.94/ to which we don't have any direct link but
> with a few hops a user can reach this area. This release is almost 4 years
> old!
>
> I had a chat with Sean Busbey and he mentioned 0.94 could be removed from
> the site and we could send a NOTICE to user@ that the documentation can be
> found in the final 0.94 tarball in case anyone still need it. The
> tarball[1] has the same content in docs directory.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Peter
>
> [1] http://archive.apache.org/dist/hbase/hbase-0.94.27/
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:18 PM Sakthi <sa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > FYI: This is the job I'm talking about:
> > https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Website%20Link%20Checker/
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sakthi
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:17 AM Sakthi <sa...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > The most recent (and many of the previous) "*HBase Website Link
> Checker*"
> > > job of ours has reported several issues with the website. The job takes
> > > roughly 20+ hours to finish and has reported "*1458 missing files*" and
> > "*7143
> > > missing named anchors*".
> > >
> > > *Quick facts:* Of the 1400+ missing files issues, around 1200 are from
> > > 1.2, 90 from 0.94, 40 from 2.0, 30 from 2.1 and rest from the master.
> > >
> > > I have filed an *Umbrella JIRA:* HBASE-21803
> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21803> ("HBase Website
> > > Cleanup"). If folks find any other website related issues that we would
> > > like to address, we can use this umbrella to track it.
> > >
> > > Any suggestions are welcome!
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Sakthi
> > >
> >
>
Re: HBase Website Cleanup task
Posted by Peter Somogyi <ps...@apache.org>.
Does anyone have any concern with removing 0.94 documentation completely
from hbase.apache.org? Currently it is hosted at
https://hbase.apache.org/0.94/ to which we don't have any direct link but
with a few hops a user can reach this area. This release is almost 4 years
old!
I had a chat with Sean Busbey and he mentioned 0.94 could be removed from
the site and we could send a NOTICE to user@ that the documentation can be
found in the final 0.94 tarball in case anyone still need it. The
tarball[1] has the same content in docs directory.
What do you think?
Peter
[1] http://archive.apache.org/dist/hbase/hbase-0.94.27/
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:18 PM Sakthi <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> FYI: This is the job I'm talking about:
> https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Website%20Link%20Checker/
>
> Regards,
> Sakthi
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:17 AM Sakthi <sa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > The most recent (and many of the previous) "*HBase Website Link Checker*"
> > job of ours has reported several issues with the website. The job takes
> > roughly 20+ hours to finish and has reported "*1458 missing files*" and
> "*7143
> > missing named anchors*".
> >
> > *Quick facts:* Of the 1400+ missing files issues, around 1200 are from
> > 1.2, 90 from 0.94, 40 from 2.0, 30 from 2.1 and rest from the master.
> >
> > I have filed an *Umbrella JIRA:* HBASE-21803
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21803> ("HBase Website
> > Cleanup"). If folks find any other website related issues that we would
> > like to address, we can use this umbrella to track it.
> >
> > Any suggestions are welcome!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sakthi
> >
>
Re: HBase Website Cleanup task
Posted by Sakthi <sa...@gmail.com>.
FYI: This is the job I'm talking about:
https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Website%20Link%20Checker/
Regards,
Sakthi
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:17 AM Sakthi <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> The most recent (and many of the previous) "*HBase Website Link Checker*"
> job of ours has reported several issues with the website. The job takes
> roughly 20+ hours to finish and has reported "*1458 missing files*" and "*7143
> missing named anchors*".
>
> *Quick facts:* Of the 1400+ missing files issues, around 1200 are from
> 1.2, 90 from 0.94, 40 from 2.0, 30 from 2.1 and rest from the master.
>
> I have filed an *Umbrella JIRA:* HBASE-21803
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21803> ("HBase Website
> Cleanup"). If folks find any other website related issues that we would
> like to address, we can use this umbrella to track it.
>
> Any suggestions are welcome!
>
> Regards,
> Sakthi
>