Review Request 46025: Clarified comments on socket data structures in SocketManager.

[Neil Conway <ne...@gmail.com>]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46025/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.


Repository: mesos


Description
-------

Clarified comments on socket data structures in SocketManager.


Diffs
-----

  3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp 5e9dcfdc52f3a8223bc43af149b8e1f5dbdf5b0a 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46025/diff/


Testing
-------


Thanks,

Neil Conway

Re: Review Request 46025: Clarified comments on socket data structures in SocketManager.

[Ben Mahler <be...@gmail.com>]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46025/#review128259
-----------------------------------------------------------



Looks good, just some food for thought and a question related to the relationship between `dispose` and `temps`.


3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp (lines 353 - 376)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/46025/#comment191680>

    One question I have looking at this is whether we would benefit from more explicit structure here:
    
    ```
    struct
    {
      map<int, Socket*> sockets;
      map<int, Address> addresses;
      set<int> dispose;
      map<Address, int> temps;
      map<Address, int> persists;
      map<int, queue<Encoder*>> outgoing;
    } outbound;
    
    struct
    {
      map<int, Socket*> sockets;
    } inbound;
    ```
    
    This assumes we don't need to track both inbound and outbound within the same map. From a quick glance at the code I can't see any reason to store them in the same map but perhaps I'm missing something.
    
    There seems to be potential for significant consolidation of the outbond structures as well.



3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp (lines 356 - 358)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/46025/#comment191679>

    Why didn't you update this comment? Is the set of values within `temps` equivalent to `dispose`? Would be great to explain the distinction here.


- Ben Mahler


On April 11, 2016, 2:35 p.m., Neil Conway wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/46025/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 11, 2016, 2:35 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Clarified comments on socket data structures in SocketManager.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp 5e9dcfdc52f3a8223bc43af149b8e1f5dbdf5b0a 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46025/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Neil Conway
> 
>