You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mahout.apache.org by Karl Wettin <ka...@gmail.com> on 2009/01/09 19:56:20 UTC
Inactivity
Hello Mahout,
sorry about my lack of activity, I've been extremely busy with life
and work as of the last months, prioritizing Lucene Java only.. I hope
you understand.
Isabel has been in touch with me and asked what happened with the 0.1-
release. I sort of got lost when my first attempt got too much
feedback but feel like I could give it a new try next weekend. I have
to read up on the posts regarding what has happend with the Ant-Maven
discusion, et c. Most important, are there any reason to why not to
create a new release candiate of the current trunk?
karl
Re: Inactivity
Posted by Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>.
I'm fine with it. I don't know enough about maven to do it properly. I
would be happy to get used to whatever system is set up.
The only concern I have is that some bits in my taste-build file may
not translate into maven, right? Don't delete it, at least. Is this
where you end up having an Ant build file and integrating into maven
somehow -- that is, is it possible we will retain Ant files anyway for
special tasks? That would be fine by me for sure. If not, as long as
we can leave it, that's fine too.
Sean
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org> wrote:
> How about we move to Maven and then try producing an RC with it?
>
> The job would be:
> Get everything working w/ Maven, including building the necessary WAR, etc.
> Make sure all tests pass, etc. I believe Karl has done a lot of this
> already.
> Remove the Ant files (or at least mark them as deprecated somehow by moving
> them to build-deprecated.xml so that we can still refer to them if we need
> to quickly remember something)
> Create an RC
>
> I will help where I can.
>
> -Grant
Re: Inactivity
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
How about we move to Maven and then try producing an RC with it?
The job would be:
Get everything working w/ Maven, including building the necessary WAR,
etc. Make sure all tests pass, etc. I believe Karl has done a lot
of this already.
Remove the Ant files (or at least mark them as deprecated somehow by
moving them to build-deprecated.xml so that we can still refer to them
if we need to quickly remember something)
Create an RC
I will help where I can.
-Grant
On Jan 12, 2009, at 1:37 PM, Isabel Drost wrote:
> On Friday 09 January 2009, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> I feel really comfortable at this point using Maven plus the ANT
>> plugin, when needed. I think this resolves my concerns about the
>> last
>> 10% of Maven that is needed for customization that Ant is really good
>> at, while allowing for the other 90% to just work, as in Maven.
>
> I am fine with Maven as well.
>
>
>> On Jan 9, 2009, at 1:59 PM, Sean Owen wrote:
>>> Nothing from my perspective. Would definitely like to get 0.1 out!
>
> +1 Karl, if you need any help, just tell me.
>
> Isabel
>
> --
> The secret of happiness is total disregard of everybody.
> |\ _,,,---,,_ Web: <http://www.isabel-drost.de>
> /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_
> |,4- ) )-,_..;\ ( `'-'
> '---''(_/--' `-'\_) (fL) IM: <xm...@spaceboyz.net>
Re: Inactivity
Posted by Isabel Drost <is...@apache.org>.
On Friday 09 January 2009, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> I feel really comfortable at this point using Maven plus the ANT
> plugin, when needed. I think this resolves my concerns about the last
> 10% of Maven that is needed for customization that Ant is really good
> at, while allowing for the other 90% to just work, as in Maven.
I am fine with Maven as well.
> On Jan 9, 2009, at 1:59 PM, Sean Owen wrote:
> > Nothing from my perspective. Would definitely like to get 0.1 out!
+1 Karl, if you need any help, just tell me.
Isabel
--
The secret of happiness is total disregard of everybody.
|\ _,,,---,,_ Web: <http://www.isabel-drost.de>
/,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_
|,4- ) )-,_..;\ ( `'-'
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) (fL) IM: <xm...@spaceboyz.net>
Re: Inactivity
Posted by Kay Kay <ka...@gmail.com>.
Just my 2 cents. How about ivy, that provides automatic dependency
management while still co-existing in the Ant.
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Me too. I've been swamped lately, too, but it is good to see Isabel
> and Jeff contributing some code. I think I will have some cycles
> soon, hopefully, and would like to get 0.1 out. I would like to
> resolve the whole Ant/Maven thing, too.
>
> I feel really comfortable at this point using Maven plus the ANT
> plugin, when needed. I think this resolves my concerns about the last
> 10% of Maven that is needed for customization that Ant is really good
> at, while allowing for the other 90% to just work, as in Maven.
>
> -Grant
>
> On Jan 9, 2009, at 1:59 PM, Sean Owen wrote:
>
>> Nothing from my perspective. Would definitely like to get 0.1 out!
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Karl Wettin <ka...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Hello Mahout,
>>>
>>> sorry about my lack of activity, I've been extremely busy with life
>>> and work
>>> as of the last months, prioritizing Lucene Java only.. I hope you
>>> understand.
>>>
>>> Isabel has been in touch with me and asked what happened with the
>>> 0.1-release. I sort of got lost when my first attempt got too much
>>> feedback
>>> but feel like I could give it a new try next weekend. I have to read
>>> up on
>>> the posts regarding what has happend with the Ant-Maven discusion,
>>> et c.
>>> Most important, are there any reason to why not to create a new release
>>> candiate of the current trunk?
>
>
>
Re: Inactivity
Posted by Karl Wettin <ka...@gmail.com>.
I've been trying to set up the Maven dist thingy. It's working out
pretty good but I didn't manage to finish it up this weekend. I'll
keep working on it during the week and hope for a release candidate by
friday.
karl
9 jan 2009 kl. 20.33 skrev Grant Ingersoll:
> Me too. I've been swamped lately, too, but it is good to see
> Isabel and Jeff contributing some code. I think I will have some
> cycles soon, hopefully, and would like to get 0.1 out. I would like
> to resolve the whole Ant/Maven thing, too.
>
> I feel really comfortable at this point using Maven plus the ANT
> plugin, when needed. I think this resolves my concerns about the
> last 10% of Maven that is needed for customization that Ant is
> really good at, while allowing for the other 90% to just work, as in
> Maven.
>
> -Grant
>
> On Jan 9, 2009, at 1:59 PM, Sean Owen wrote:
>
>> Nothing from my perspective. Would definitely like to get 0.1 out!
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Karl Wettin <ka...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Hello Mahout,
>>>
>>> sorry about my lack of activity, I've been extremely busy with
>>> life and work
>>> as of the last months, prioritizing Lucene Java only.. I hope you
>>> understand.
>>>
>>> Isabel has been in touch with me and asked what happened with the
>>> 0.1-release. I sort of got lost when my first attempt got too much
>>> feedback
>>> but feel like I could give it a new try next weekend. I have to
>>> read up on
>>> the posts regarding what has happend with the Ant-Maven discusion,
>>> et c.
>>> Most important, are there any reason to why not to create a new
>>> release
>>> candiate of the current trunk?
>
>
Re: Inactivity
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
Me too. I've been swamped lately, too, but it is good to see Isabel
and Jeff contributing some code. I think I will have some cycles
soon, hopefully, and would like to get 0.1 out. I would like to
resolve the whole Ant/Maven thing, too.
I feel really comfortable at this point using Maven plus the ANT
plugin, when needed. I think this resolves my concerns about the last
10% of Maven that is needed for customization that Ant is really good
at, while allowing for the other 90% to just work, as in Maven.
-Grant
On Jan 9, 2009, at 1:59 PM, Sean Owen wrote:
> Nothing from my perspective. Would definitely like to get 0.1 out!
>
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Karl Wettin <ka...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Hello Mahout,
>>
>> sorry about my lack of activity, I've been extremely busy with life
>> and work
>> as of the last months, prioritizing Lucene Java only.. I hope you
>> understand.
>>
>> Isabel has been in touch with me and asked what happened with the
>> 0.1-release. I sort of got lost when my first attempt got too much
>> feedback
>> but feel like I could give it a new try next weekend. I have to
>> read up on
>> the posts regarding what has happend with the Ant-Maven discusion,
>> et c.
>> Most important, are there any reason to why not to create a new
>> release
>> candiate of the current trunk?
Re: Inactivity
Posted by Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>.
Done, I am not all that concerned about the duplication.
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
<ot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I'd go for 1) and open a JIRA that reminds us to figure out to refactor to remove or minimize code duplication.
> With 2) this boolean-optimized option will be forgotten by others (other than by others)
Re: Inactivity
Posted by Otis Gospodnetic <ot...@yahoo.com>.
I'd go for 1) and open a JIRA that reminds us to figure out to refactor to remove or minimize code duplication.
With 2) this boolean-optimized option will be forgotten by others (other than by others)
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
----- Original Message ----
> From: Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>
> To: mahout-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, January 9, 2009 5:54:15 PM
> Subject: Re: Inactivity
>
> They're kinda ugly and duplicate some code... more of a rough proof of
> concept. What do you think, should I...
>
> 1) just commit it after doing whatever light cleanup I can, or
> 2) turn it over to you, to take this code into your project rather
> than put it in the core
> 3) farm it out to examples/ as an illustration of extending the basic framework?
>
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
> wrote:
> > Sean,
> >
> > Do you think it would make sense to try and get those Boolean* versions of
> various Taste classes in?
> >
> > 2371 12-31-49 16:00 BooleanPrefUser.java
> > 5790 12-31-49 16:00 BooleanUserGenericDataModel.java
> > 9809 12-31-49 16:00 BooleanPrefUserFileDataModel.java
> > 3345 12-31-49 16:00 BooleanTanimotoCoefficientSimilarity.java
> > 10501 12-31-49 16:00 BooleanUserGenericUserBasedRecommender.java
> > 7237 12-31-49 16:00 FastSet.jav
> >
> >
> > I'm using them in pre-production environment and they work well!
Re: Inactivity
Posted by Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>.
They're kinda ugly and duplicate some code... more of a rough proof of
concept. What do you think, should I...
1) just commit it after doing whatever light cleanup I can, or
2) turn it over to you, to take this code into your project rather
than put it in the core
3) farm it out to examples/ as an illustration of extending the basic framework?
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
<ot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Sean,
>
> Do you think it would make sense to try and get those Boolean* versions of various Taste classes in?
>
> 2371 12-31-49 16:00 BooleanPrefUser.java
> 5790 12-31-49 16:00 BooleanUserGenericDataModel.java
> 9809 12-31-49 16:00 BooleanPrefUserFileDataModel.java
> 3345 12-31-49 16:00 BooleanTanimotoCoefficientSimilarity.java
> 10501 12-31-49 16:00 BooleanUserGenericUserBasedRecommender.java
> 7237 12-31-49 16:00 FastSet.jav
>
>
> I'm using them in pre-production environment and they work well!
Re: Inactivity
Posted by Otis Gospodnetic <ot...@yahoo.com>.
Sean,
Do you think it would make sense to try and get those Boolean* versions of various Taste classes in?
2371 12-31-49 16:00 BooleanPrefUser.java
5790 12-31-49 16:00 BooleanUserGenericDataModel.java
9809 12-31-49 16:00 BooleanPrefUserFileDataModel.java
3345 12-31-49 16:00 BooleanTanimotoCoefficientSimilarity.java
10501 12-31-49 16:00 BooleanUserGenericUserBasedRecommender.java
7237 12-31-49 16:00 FastSet.jav
I'm using them in pre-production environment and they work well!
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
----- Original Message ----
> From: Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>
> To: mahout-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, January 9, 2009 1:59:38 PM
> Subject: Re: Inactivity
>
> Nothing from my perspective. Would definitely like to get 0.1 out!
>
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Karl Wettin wrote:
> > Hello Mahout,
> >
> > sorry about my lack of activity, I've been extremely busy with life and work
> > as of the last months, prioritizing Lucene Java only.. I hope you
> > understand.
> >
> > Isabel has been in touch with me and asked what happened with the
> > 0.1-release. I sort of got lost when my first attempt got too much feedback
> > but feel like I could give it a new try next weekend. I have to read up on
> > the posts regarding what has happend with the Ant-Maven discusion, et c.
> > Most important, are there any reason to why not to create a new release
> > candiate of the current trunk?
Re: Inactivity
Posted by Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>.
Nothing from my perspective. Would definitely like to get 0.1 out!
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Karl Wettin <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Mahout,
>
> sorry about my lack of activity, I've been extremely busy with life and work
> as of the last months, prioritizing Lucene Java only.. I hope you
> understand.
>
> Isabel has been in touch with me and asked what happened with the
> 0.1-release. I sort of got lost when my first attempt got too much feedback
> but feel like I could give it a new try next weekend. I have to read up on
> the posts regarding what has happend with the Ant-Maven discusion, et c.
> Most important, are there any reason to why not to create a new release
> candiate of the current trunk?