You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@allura.apache.org by Cory Johns <jo...@gmail.com> on 2013/08/23 00:21:53 UTC
Release 1.0.0
We've done a couple of back-and-forths on the 1.0.0 release candidate now,
and I think the current release up at
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/allura/ should address the
concerns raised thus far.
This will be our first ASF release, so it would be great to see everyone
who's been involved, everyone on the list, offer their feedback, even if
just a +1 vote, binding or otherwise.
PMCs, mentors, et al.: Have we got our ducks in a row? Is there anything
else we can do to ensure our first release goes smoothly?
Re: Release 1.0.0
Posted by Tim Van Steenburgh <tv...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Cory Johns wrote:
> We've done a couple of back-and-forths on the 1.0.0 release candidate now,
> and I think the current release up at
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/allura/ should address the
> concerns raised thus far.
>
> This will be our first ASF release, so it would be great to see everyone
> who's been involved, everyone on the list, offer their feedback, even if
> just a +1 vote, binding or otherwise.
>
> PMCs, mentors, et al.: Have we got our ducks in a row? Is there anything
> else we can do to ensure our first release goes smoothly?
>
>
Re: Release 1.0.0
Posted by Wayne Witzel III <ww...@gmail.com>.
The only thing I am not sure about is if we have properly met the "Release Documentation" requirement?
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-documentation
Is our CHANGES file enough for that? Or are users expecting a RELEASE_NOTES as well?
--
Wayne Witzel III (@wwitzel3)
wwitzel3@gmail.com
http://pieceofpy.com
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 at 18:21 , Cory Johns wrote:
> We've done a couple of back-and-forths on the 1.0.0 release candidate now,
> and I think the current release up at
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/allura/ should address the
> concerns raised thus far.
>
> This will be our first ASF release, so it would be great to see everyone
> who's been involved, everyone on the list, offer their feedback, even if
> just a +1 vote, binding or otherwise.
>
> PMCs, mentors, et al.: Have we got our ducks in a row? Is there anything
> else we can do to ensure our first release goes smoothly?
Re: Release 1.0.0
Posted by Rick Copeland <ri...@arborian.com>.
+1
Congrats!
On Aug 22, 2013, at 6:21 PM, Cory Johns wrote:
> We've done a couple of back-and-forths on the 1.0.0 release candidate now,
> and I think the current release up at
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/allura/ should address the
> concerns raised thus far.
>
> This will be our first ASF release, so it would be great to see everyone
> who's been involved, everyone on the list, offer their feedback, even if
> just a +1 vote, binding or otherwise.
>
> PMCs, mentors, et al.: Have we got our ducks in a row? Is there anything
> else we can do to ensure our first release goes smoothly?
Re: Release 1.0.0
Posted by Peter Hartmann <ma...@gmail.com>.
On 23.08.2013 00:21 Cory Johns <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We've done a couple of back-and-forths on the 1.0.0 release candidate
> now,
> and I think the current release up at
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/allura/ should address
> the
> concerns raised thus far.
>
> This will be our first ASF release, so it would be great to see everyone
> who's been involved, everyone on the list, offer their feedback, even if
> just a +1 vote, binding or otherwise.
>
> PMCs, mentors, et al.: Have we got our ducks in a row? Is there anything
> else we can do to ensure our first release goes smoothly?
+1 (binding)
Re: Release 1.0.0
Posted by Dave Brondsema <da...@brondsema.net>.
I appended my signature to
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/allura/allura-incubating-1.0.0.tar.gz.asc
using instructions from http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#sign-release
On 8/26/13 4:55 PM, Dave Brondsema wrote:
> For the official record, my +1 is still good from the previous tarballs for this
> release.
>
> I'm very happy that we now have some community members, more PMC members and a
> mentor that have cast votes.
>
> Should we post the results of this vote, and then go to the
> general@incubator.a.o list to vote there? We'll want to check that list for
> examples, most of their vote threads have been formatted a little differently
> than was done for this initial vote.
>
> We'll also want to remember to move the git tag, to
> 6ce8edf50e207013aa81fa2bb8bdf1b369751c8a if I'm not mistaken.
>
> And I have a PGP key in KEYS so I can figure out how to add my signature to the
> .asc file. I suppose that'd be worthwhile to do before we go to the IPMC vote,
> so they can validate the final .asc format too
>
> -Dave
>
>
> On 8/26/13 1:21 PM, Cory Johns wrote:
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Daniel Hinojosa <
>> dhinojosa@slashdotmedia.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 08/22/2013 06:21 PM, Cory Johns wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> We've done a couple of back-and-forths on the 1.0.0 release candidate
>>> now,
>>>>> and I think the current release up at
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/**dist/dev/incubator/allura/<
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/allura/>should address
>>> the
>>>>> concerns raised thus far.
>>>>>
>>>>> This will be our first ASF release, so it would be great to see everyone
>>>>> who's been involved, everyone on the list, offer their feedback, even if
>>>>> just a +1 vote, binding or otherwise.
>>>>>
>>>>> PMCs, mentors, et al.: Have we got our ducks in a row? Is there
>>> anything
>>>>> else we can do to ensure our first release goes smoothly?
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> Congratulations!
>>>>
>>>> I look forward to hearing more from the wider Incubator community.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Rich Bowen
>>>> rbowen@rcbowen.com
>>>> Shosholoza
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Daniel Hinojosa*
>>> *Community Manager, Slashdot Media*
>>> p: 415.890.3608
>>> e: d@slashdotmedia.com
>>> facebook: facebook.com/d.Slashdotmedia
>>> skype: hinojosad
>>>
>>
>
>
>
--
Dave Brondsema : dave@brondsema.net
http://www.brondsema.net : personal
http://www.splike.com : programming
<><
Re: Release 1.0.0
Posted by Simone Gatti <si...@gmail.com>.
+1 binding
Il giorno 27/ago/2013 22:26, "Roberto Galoppini" <
roberto.galoppini@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> 2013/8/26 Dave Brondsema <da...@brondsema.net>
>
> > For the official record, my +1 is still good from the previous tarballs
> > for this
> > release.
> >
> > I'm very happy that we now have some community members, more PMC members
> > and a
> > mentor that have cast votes.
> >
>
> > Should we post the results of this vote, and then go to the
> > general@incubator.a.o list to vote there? We'll want to check that list
> > for
> > examples, most of their vote threads have been formatted a little
> > differently
> > than was done for this initial vote.
> >
>
> We should make sure to vote in the right thread (ie. where VOTE in the
> subject).
> The present thread was in fact aimed at discussing around the vote, we
> might want to tag the subject in a way that makes that clear too.
>
> Also before starting the vote we should declare if it's a 72hrs VOTE or
> what. Being our very first vote and happening on Summer time I believe a
> week or even two could be good a choice.
>
> Having reviewed the changes I'm going to cast my vote in the other thread.
>
> Roberto
>
>
>
> >
> > We'll also want to remember to move the git tag, to
> > 6ce8edf50e207013aa81fa2bb8bdf1b369751c8a if I'm not mistaken.
> >
> > And I have a PGP key in KEYS so I can figure out how to add my signature
> > to the
> > .asc file. I suppose that'd be worthwhile to do before we go to the IPMC
> > vote,
> > so they can validate the final .asc format too
> >
> > -Dave
> >
> >
> > On 8/26/13 1:21 PM, Cory Johns wrote:
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Daniel Hinojosa <
> > > dhinojosa@slashdotmedia.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> On 08/22/2013 06:21 PM, Cory Johns wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> We've done a couple of back-and-forths on the 1.0.0 release
> candidate
> > >> now,
> > >>>> and I think the current release up at
> > >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/**dist/dev/incubator/allura/<
> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/allura/>should
> address
> > >> the
> > >>>> concerns raised thus far.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> This will be our first ASF release, so it would be great to see
> > everyone
> > >>>> who's been involved, everyone on the list, offer their feedback,
> even
> > if
> > >>>> just a +1 vote, binding or otherwise.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> PMCs, mentors, et al.: Have we got our ducks in a row? Is there
> > >> anything
> > >>>> else we can do to ensure our first release goes smoothly?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> +1
> > >>>
> > >>> Congratulations!
> > >>>
> > >>> I look forward to hearing more from the wider Incubator community.
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Rich Bowen
> > >>> rbowen@rcbowen.com
> > >>> Shosholoza
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> *Daniel Hinojosa*
> > >> *Community Manager, Slashdot Media*
> > >> p: 415.890.3608
> > >> e: d@slashdotmedia.com
> > >> facebook: facebook.com/d.Slashdotmedia
> > >> skype: hinojosad
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dave Brondsema : dave@brondsema.net
> > http://www.brondsema.net : personal
> > http://www.splike.com : programming
> > <><
> >
>
Re: Release 1.0.0
Posted by Roberto Galoppini <ro...@gmail.com>.
2013/8/26 Dave Brondsema <da...@brondsema.net>
> For the official record, my +1 is still good from the previous tarballs
> for this
> release.
>
> I'm very happy that we now have some community members, more PMC members
> and a
> mentor that have cast votes.
>
> Should we post the results of this vote, and then go to the
> general@incubator.a.o list to vote there? We'll want to check that list
> for
> examples, most of their vote threads have been formatted a little
> differently
> than was done for this initial vote.
>
We should make sure to vote in the right thread (ie. where VOTE in the
subject).
The present thread was in fact aimed at discussing around the vote, we
might want to tag the subject in a way that makes that clear too.
Also before starting the vote we should declare if it's a 72hrs VOTE or
what. Being our very first vote and happening on Summer time I believe a
week or even two could be good a choice.
Having reviewed the changes I'm going to cast my vote in the other thread.
Roberto
>
> We'll also want to remember to move the git tag, to
> 6ce8edf50e207013aa81fa2bb8bdf1b369751c8a if I'm not mistaken.
>
> And I have a PGP key in KEYS so I can figure out how to add my signature
> to the
> .asc file. I suppose that'd be worthwhile to do before we go to the IPMC
> vote,
> so they can validate the final .asc format too
>
> -Dave
>
>
> On 8/26/13 1:21 PM, Cory Johns wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Daniel Hinojosa <
> > dhinojosa@slashdotmedia.com> wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 08/22/2013 06:21 PM, Cory Johns wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> We've done a couple of back-and-forths on the 1.0.0 release candidate
> >> now,
> >>>> and I think the current release up at
> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/**dist/dev/incubator/allura/<
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/allura/>should address
> >> the
> >>>> concerns raised thus far.
> >>>>
> >>>> This will be our first ASF release, so it would be great to see
> everyone
> >>>> who's been involved, everyone on the list, offer their feedback, even
> if
> >>>> just a +1 vote, binding or otherwise.
> >>>>
> >>>> PMCs, mentors, et al.: Have we got our ducks in a row? Is there
> >> anything
> >>>> else we can do to ensure our first release goes smoothly?
> >>>>
> >>>> +1
> >>>
> >>> Congratulations!
> >>>
> >>> I look forward to hearing more from the wider Incubator community.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Rich Bowen
> >>> rbowen@rcbowen.com
> >>> Shosholoza
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> *Daniel Hinojosa*
> >> *Community Manager, Slashdot Media*
> >> p: 415.890.3608
> >> e: d@slashdotmedia.com
> >> facebook: facebook.com/d.Slashdotmedia
> >> skype: hinojosad
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Brondsema : dave@brondsema.net
> http://www.brondsema.net : personal
> http://www.splike.com : programming
> <><
>
Re: Release 1.0.0
Posted by Dave Brondsema <da...@brondsema.net>.
For the official record, my +1 is still good from the previous tarballs for this
release.
I'm very happy that we now have some community members, more PMC members and a
mentor that have cast votes.
Should we post the results of this vote, and then go to the
general@incubator.a.o list to vote there? We'll want to check that list for
examples, most of their vote threads have been formatted a little differently
than was done for this initial vote.
We'll also want to remember to move the git tag, to
6ce8edf50e207013aa81fa2bb8bdf1b369751c8a if I'm not mistaken.
And I have a PGP key in KEYS so I can figure out how to add my signature to the
.asc file. I suppose that'd be worthwhile to do before we go to the IPMC vote,
so they can validate the final .asc format too
-Dave
On 8/26/13 1:21 PM, Cory Johns wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Daniel Hinojosa <
> dhinojosa@slashdotmedia.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/22/2013 06:21 PM, Cory Johns wrote:
>>>
>>>> We've done a couple of back-and-forths on the 1.0.0 release candidate
>> now,
>>>> and I think the current release up at
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/**dist/dev/incubator/allura/<
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/allura/>should address
>> the
>>>> concerns raised thus far.
>>>>
>>>> This will be our first ASF release, so it would be great to see everyone
>>>> who's been involved, everyone on the list, offer their feedback, even if
>>>> just a +1 vote, binding or otherwise.
>>>>
>>>> PMCs, mentors, et al.: Have we got our ducks in a row? Is there
>> anything
>>>> else we can do to ensure our first release goes smoothly?
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>
>>> Congratulations!
>>>
>>> I look forward to hearing more from the wider Incubator community.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Rich Bowen
>>> rbowen@rcbowen.com
>>> Shosholoza
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Daniel Hinojosa*
>> *Community Manager, Slashdot Media*
>> p: 415.890.3608
>> e: d@slashdotmedia.com
>> facebook: facebook.com/d.Slashdotmedia
>> skype: hinojosad
>>
>
--
Dave Brondsema : dave@brondsema.net
http://www.brondsema.net : personal
http://www.splike.com : programming
<><
Re: Release 1.0.0
Posted by Cory Johns <jo...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Daniel Hinojosa <
dhinojosa@slashdotmedia.com> wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
>
> > On 08/22/2013 06:21 PM, Cory Johns wrote:
> >
> >> We've done a couple of back-and-forths on the 1.0.0 release candidate
> now,
> >> and I think the current release up at
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/**dist/dev/incubator/allura/<
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/allura/>should address
> the
> >> concerns raised thus far.
> >>
> >> This will be our first ASF release, so it would be great to see everyone
> >> who's been involved, everyone on the list, offer their feedback, even if
> >> just a +1 vote, binding or otherwise.
> >>
> >> PMCs, mentors, et al.: Have we got our ducks in a row? Is there
> anything
> >> else we can do to ensure our first release goes smoothly?
> >>
> >> +1
> >
> > Congratulations!
> >
> > I look forward to hearing more from the wider Incubator community.
> >
> > --
> > Rich Bowen
> > rbowen@rcbowen.com
> > Shosholoza
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> *Daniel Hinojosa*
> *Community Manager, Slashdot Media*
> p: 415.890.3608
> e: d@slashdotmedia.com
> facebook: facebook.com/d.Slashdotmedia
> skype: hinojosad
>
Re: Release 1.0.0
Posted by Daniel Hinojosa <dh...@slashdotmedia.com>.
+1
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
> On 08/22/2013 06:21 PM, Cory Johns wrote:
>
>> We've done a couple of back-and-forths on the 1.0.0 release candidate now,
>> and I think the current release up at
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/**dist/dev/incubator/allura/<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/allura/>should address the
>> concerns raised thus far.
>>
>> This will be our first ASF release, so it would be great to see everyone
>> who's been involved, everyone on the list, offer their feedback, even if
>> just a +1 vote, binding or otherwise.
>>
>> PMCs, mentors, et al.: Have we got our ducks in a row? Is there anything
>> else we can do to ensure our first release goes smoothly?
>>
>> +1
>
> Congratulations!
>
> I look forward to hearing more from the wider Incubator community.
>
> --
> Rich Bowen
> rbowen@rcbowen.com
> Shosholoza
>
>
--
*Daniel Hinojosa*
*Community Manager, Slashdot Media*
p: 415.890.3608
e: d@slashdotmedia.com
facebook: facebook.com/d.Slashdotmedia
skype: hinojosad
Re: Release 1.0.0
Posted by Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com>.
On 08/22/2013 06:21 PM, Cory Johns wrote:
> We've done a couple of back-and-forths on the 1.0.0 release candidate now,
> and I think the current release up at
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/allura/ should address the
> concerns raised thus far.
>
> This will be our first ASF release, so it would be great to see everyone
> who's been involved, everyone on the list, offer their feedback, even if
> just a +1 vote, binding or otherwise.
>
> PMCs, mentors, et al.: Have we got our ducks in a row? Is there anything
> else we can do to ensure our first release goes smoothly?
>
+1
Congratulations!
I look forward to hearing more from the wider Incubator community.
--
Rich Bowen
rbowen@rcbowen.com
Shosholoza
Re: Release 1.0.0
Posted by Chris Tsai <ct...@slashdotmedia.com>.
Perhaps the README file should to be tweaked? Currently, its install instructions indicate obtaining latest source via git, instead of how to install the versioned release they just downloaded.
--
Chris Tsai
SourceForge.net Support
sfnet_ops@slashdotmedia.com
On Friday, August 23, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Wayne Witzel III wrote:
> I'm waiting to get clarification on the release documentation before I vote.
>
> --
> Wayne Witzel III (@wwitzel3)
> wayne@pieceofpy.com (mailto:wayne@pieceofpy.com)
> http://pieceofpy.com
>
>
> On Friday, August 23, 2013 at 10:56 , Dave Brondsema wrote:
>
> > On 8/22/13 6:21 PM, Cory Johns wrote:
> > > We've done a couple of back-and-forths on the 1.0.0 release candidate now,
> > > and I think the current release up at
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/allura/ should address the
> > > concerns raised thus far.
> > >
> > > This will be our first ASF release, so it would be great to see everyone
> > > who's been involved, everyone on the list, offer their feedback, even if
> > > just a +1 vote, binding or otherwise.
> > >
> > > PMCs, mentors, et al.: Have we got our ducks in a row? Is there anything
> > > else we can do to ensure our first release goes smoothly?
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I would love to hear more voices on this our first release.
> >
> > Mentors and PMC members who haven't voted, would you mind telling us why? E.g.
> > haven't had time, not sure what is required to vote, haven't noticed the email
> > threads, etc?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dave Brondsema : dave@brondsema.net (mailto:dave@brondsema.net)
> > http://www.brondsema.net : personal
> > http://www.splike.com : programming
> > <><
> >
>
>
>
Re: Release 1.0.0
Posted by Wayne Witzel III <ww...@gmail.com>.
+1 binding
--
Wayne Witzel III (@wwitzel3)
wwitzel3@gmail.com
http://pieceofpy.com
On Friday, August 23, 2013 at 12:12 , Dave Brondsema wrote:
> On 8/23/13 11:10 AM, Peter Hartmann wrote:
> > On 23.08.2013 16:59 Wayne Witzel III <wwitzel3@gmail.com (mailto:wwitzel3@gmail.com)> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm waiting to get clarification on the release documentation before I vote.
> >
> > That's not an issue for me, but I'd like to hear about it too, so while I plan
> > to vote I held myself for now.
> >
> > As I see it, release documentation describe new features and incompatibilities
> > in a less technical way that i.e. CHANGES. But this is our first release, so
> > it's not like we have particularly much to describe. Every feature is "new"
> > (previously unreleased) and there is no earlier version to be incompatible with.
>
>
>
> I agree. I think its something we can compile with more details for future
> releases.
>
> Chris Tsai wrote:
> > Perhaps the README file should to be tweaked? Currently, its install instructions
> > indicate obtaining latest source via git, instead of how to install the
> > versioned release they just downloaded.
>
>
>
> That makes sense, although the README is useful for folks that do a git clone or
> are browsing the repo over the web too. So we'd want to accommodate having the
> source already, getting the latest, or downloading an official release.
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-documentation
> describes guidelines and best practices, so I think these are perfect items for
> improvement for our next release, and no reason to stop a first release.
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Brondsema : dave@brondsema.net (mailto:dave@brondsema.net)
> http://www.brondsema.net : personal
> http://www.splike.com : programming
> <><
Re: Release 1.0.0
Posted by Dave Brondsema <da...@brondsema.net>.
On 8/23/13 11:10 AM, Peter Hartmann wrote:
> On 23.08.2013 16:59 Wayne Witzel III <ww...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm waiting to get clarification on the release documentation before I vote.
>>
>
> That's not an issue for me, but I'd like to hear about it too, so while I plan
> to vote I held myself for now.
>
> As I see it, release documentation describe new features and incompatibilities
> in a less technical way that i.e. CHANGES. But this is our first release, so
> it's not like we have particularly much to describe. Every feature is "new"
> (previously unreleased) and there is no earlier version to be incompatible with.
>
I agree. I think its something we can compile with more details for future
releases.
Chris Tsai wrote:
> Perhaps the README file should to be tweaked? Currently, its install instructions
> indicate obtaining latest source via git, instead of how to install the
> versioned release they just downloaded.
That makes sense, although the README is useful for folks that do a git clone or
are browsing the repo over the web too. So we'd want to accommodate having the
source already, getting the latest, or downloading an official release.
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-documentation
describes guidelines and best practices, so I think these are perfect items for
improvement for our next release, and no reason to stop a first release.
--
Dave Brondsema : dave@brondsema.net
http://www.brondsema.net : personal
http://www.splike.com : programming
<><
Re: Release 1.0.0
Posted by Peter Hartmann <ma...@gmail.com>.
On 23.08.2013 16:59 Wayne Witzel III <ww...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm waiting to get clarification on the release documentation before I
> vote.
>
That's not an issue for me, but I'd like to hear about it too, so while I
plan to vote I held myself for now.
As I see it, release documentation describe new features and
incompatibilities in a less technical way that i.e. CHANGES. But this is
our first release, so it's not like we have particularly much to describe.
Every feature is "new" (previously unreleased) and there is no earlier
version to be incompatible with.
Re: Release 1.0.0
Posted by Wayne Witzel III <ww...@gmail.com>.
I'm waiting to get clarification on the release documentation before I vote.
--
Wayne Witzel III (@wwitzel3)
wayne@pieceofpy.com
http://pieceofpy.com
On Friday, August 23, 2013 at 10:56 , Dave Brondsema wrote:
> On 8/22/13 6:21 PM, Cory Johns wrote:
> > We've done a couple of back-and-forths on the 1.0.0 release candidate now,
> > and I think the current release up at
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/allura/ should address the
> > concerns raised thus far.
> >
> > This will be our first ASF release, so it would be great to see everyone
> > who's been involved, everyone on the list, offer their feedback, even if
> > just a +1 vote, binding or otherwise.
> >
> > PMCs, mentors, et al.: Have we got our ducks in a row? Is there anything
> > else we can do to ensure our first release goes smoothly?
>
>
>
> I would love to hear more voices on this our first release.
>
> Mentors and PMC members who haven't voted, would you mind telling us why? E.g.
> haven't had time, not sure what is required to vote, haven't noticed the email
> threads, etc?
>
>
> --
> Dave Brondsema : dave@brondsema.net (mailto:dave@brondsema.net)
> http://www.brondsema.net : personal
> http://www.splike.com : programming
> <><
Re: Release 1.0.0
Posted by Dave Brondsema <da...@brondsema.net>.
On 8/22/13 6:21 PM, Cory Johns wrote:
> We've done a couple of back-and-forths on the 1.0.0 release candidate now,
> and I think the current release up at
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/allura/ should address the
> concerns raised thus far.
>
> This will be our first ASF release, so it would be great to see everyone
> who's been involved, everyone on the list, offer their feedback, even if
> just a +1 vote, binding or otherwise.
>
> PMCs, mentors, et al.: Have we got our ducks in a row? Is there anything
> else we can do to ensure our first release goes smoothly?
>
I would love to hear more voices on this our first release.
Mentors and PMC members who haven't voted, would you mind telling us why? E.g.
haven't had time, not sure what is required to vote, haven't noticed the email
threads, etc?
--
Dave Brondsema : dave@brondsema.net
http://www.brondsema.net : personal
http://www.splike.com : programming
<><