You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ws.apache.org by Davanum Srinivas <di...@yahoo.com> on 2004/02/13 12:44:13 UTC
[VOTE] Move WSS4J back into WS-FX project
Dear PMC folks,
As per our last conversation with RSA Security...They told us that we don't have to get a license
from them if we don't implement SAML Profile. Currently the WSS4J does not implement this profile.
So we should be all set to move the project back to Apache.
Here's my VOTE:
Davanum Srinivas [+1]
This is a lazy vote as well. let's wrap it up quickly. New PMC members, please cast your first
ballots :)
Thanks,
dims
=====
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
Re: [VOTE] Move WSS4J back into WS-FX project
Posted by Berin Lautenbach <be...@wingsofhermes.org>.
A non-binding +1 from someone who is not in the PMC, but who has a
selfish interest :>
Cheers,
Berin
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Dear PMC folks,
>
> As per our last conversation with RSA Security...They told us that we don't have to get a license
> from them if we don't implement SAML Profile. Currently the WSS4J does not implement this profile.
> So we should be all set to move the project back to Apache.
>
> Here's my VOTE:
> Davanum Srinivas [+1]
>
> This is a lazy vote as well. let's wrap it up quickly. New PMC members, please cast your first
> ballots :)
>
> Thanks,
> dims
>
>
>
> =====
> Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Move WSS4J back into WS-FX project
Posted by Aleksander Slominski <as...@cs.indiana.edu>.
+1
alek
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>Dear PMC folks,
>
>As per our last conversation with RSA Security...They told us that we don't have to get a license
>from them if we don't implement SAML Profile. Currently the WSS4J does not implement this profile.
>So we should be all set to move the project back to Apache.
>
>Here's my VOTE:
>Davanum Srinivas [+1]
>
>This is a lazy vote as well. let's wrap it up quickly. New PMC members, please cast your first
>ballots :)
>
>Thanks,
>dims
>
>
>
>=====
>Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
>
>
--
The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay
Re: [VOTE] Move WSS4J back into WS-FX project
Posted by Nirmal Mukhi <nm...@us.ibm.com>.
+1.
Nirmal.
Re: [VOTE] Move WSS4J back into WS-FX project
Posted by Ryan Hoegg <rh...@isisnetworks.net>.
+1. I haven't yet scrutinized the charter (planned) nor the WSS4J code
(not likely anytime soon) but a WS-Security implementation is a welcome
piece of the puzzle.
Also, hi everyone!
--
Ryan Hoegg
ISIS Networks
http://www.isisnetworks.net/
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>Dear PMC folks,
>
>As per our last conversation with RSA Security...They told us that we don't have to get a license
>from them if we don't implement SAML Profile. Currently the WSS4J does not implement this profile.
>So we should be all set to move the project back to Apache.
>
>Here's my VOTE:
>Davanum Srinivas [+1]
>
>This is a lazy vote as well. let's wrap it up quickly. New PMC members, please cast your first
>ballots :)
>
>Thanks,
>dims
>
>
>
>=====
>Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Move WSS4J back into WS-FX project
Posted by Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@watson.ibm.com>.
+1
----- Original Message -----
From: "Davanum Srinivas" <di...@yahoo.com>
To: <pm...@ws.apache.org>
Cc: <ge...@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 5:44 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Move WSS4J back into WS-FX project
> Dear PMC folks,
>
> As per our last conversation with RSA Security...They told us that we
don't have to get a license
> from them if we don't implement SAML Profile. Currently the WSS4J does not
implement this profile.
> So we should be all set to move the project back to Apache.
>
> Here's my VOTE:
> Davanum Srinivas [+1]
>
> This is a lazy vote as well. let's wrap it up quickly. New PMC members,
please cast your first
> ballots:)
>
> Thanks,
> dims
>
>
>
> =====
> Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
Re: [VOTE] Move WSS4J back into WS-FX project
Posted by Steve Loughran <st...@iseran.com>.
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Dear PMC folks,
>
> As per our last conversation with RSA Security...They told us that we don't have to get a license
> from them if we don't implement SAML Profile. Currently the WSS4J does not implement this profile.
> So we should be all set to move the project back to Apache.
>
> Here's my VOTE:
> Davanum Srinivas [+1]
>
> This is a lazy vote as well. let's wrap it up quickly. New PMC members, please cast your first
> ballots :)
+1.
Re: [VOTE] Move WSS4J back into WS-FX project
Posted by Julie MacNaught <jm...@apache.org>.
+1
--Julie
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>Dear PMC folks,
>
>As per our last conversation with RSA Security...They told us that we don't have to get a license
>from them if we don't implement SAML Profile. Currently the WSS4J does not implement this profile.
>So we should be all set to move the project back to Apache.
>
>Here's my VOTE:
>Davanum Srinivas [+1]
>
>This is a lazy vote as well. let's wrap it up quickly. New PMC members, please cast your first
>ballots :)
>
>Thanks,
>dims
>
>
>
>=====
>Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
>
>
>
RE: [VOTE] Move WSS4J back into WS-FX project
Posted by Steve Viens <st...@viens.net>.
+1 !!!
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:dims@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 6:44 AM
To: pmc@ws.apache.org
Cc: general@ws.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Move WSS4J back into WS-FX project
Dear PMC folks,
As per our last conversation with RSA Security...They told us that we
don't have to get a license from them if we don't implement SAML
Profile. Currently the WSS4J does not implement this profile. So we
should be all set to move the project back to Apache.
Here's my VOTE:
Davanum Srinivas [+1]
This is a lazy vote as well. let's wrap it up quickly. New PMC members,
please cast your first ballots :)
Thanks,
dims
=====
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
RE: [VOTE] Move WSS4J back into WS-FX project
Posted by Ias <ia...@tmax.co.kr>.
> Dear PMC folks,
>
> As per our last conversation with RSA Security...They told us
> that we don't have to get a license from them if we don't
> implement SAML Profile. Currently the WSS4J does not
> implement this profile.
> So we should be all set to move the project back to Apache.
>
> Here's my VOTE:
> Davanum Srinivas [+1]
>
> This is a lazy vote as well. let's wrap it up quickly. New
> PMC members, please cast your first ballots :)
>
I'm glad to hear that. Here's my very first +1 in PMC. :-)
Thanks,
Ias