You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to commits@pulsar.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/09/01 18:09:39 UTC

[GitHub] [pulsar] tisonkun commented on issue #17412: Unusual jar naming strategy

tisonkun commented on issue #17412:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/17412#issuecomment-1234618594

   Is it a big deal about the name? Every project can has its own preference and if only it doesn't become a trouble for some integrations, it looks neutral to me to use `pulsar-client` as the shaded version and `pulsar-client-original` as the slim version.
   
   If we just change `pulsar-client` to the slim version, it will shock users who already use it as a shaded version. This is a user-facing interface change, but I don't see some reasonable advantages to doing so.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@pulsar.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org