You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by Joerg Heinicke <jo...@gmx.de> on 2003/07/03 21:55:12 UTC

Re: cvs commit: cocoon-site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/news archives.xml index.xml

> cziegeler    2003/07/03 07:25:03
> 
>   Added:       src/documentation/content/xdocs/link livesites.xml

>   Log:
>   Moved common docs to top level

A few days ago I divided the livesites list into three parts: 1.x, 2.0, 
2.1 and committed them to their corresponding CVS module. The first 
reason was to lower the maintenance effort, the second the length of the 
list.

Now we only have one page on top level. Shall I revert the segmentation?

Joerg

Re: cvs commit: cocoon-site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/news archives.xml index.xml

Posted by Vadim Gritsenko <va...@verizon.net>.
Joerg Heinicke wrote:

>> cziegeler    2003/07/03 07:25:03
>>
>>   Added:       src/documentation/content/xdocs/link livesites.xml
>
>
>>   Log:
>>   Moved common docs to top level
>
>
> A few days ago I divided the livesites list into three parts: 1.x, 
> 2.0, 2.1 and committed them to their corresponding CVS module. The 
> first reason was to lower the maintenance effort, the second the 
> length of the list.
>
> Now we only have one page on top level. Shall I revert the segmentation? 


I would prefer separate pages -- so, for example, Lenya also can have 
their own "powered by" page.

Vadim

Re: cvs commit: cocoon-site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/news archives.xml index.xml

Posted by Joerg Heinicke <jo...@gmx.de>.
Done. Maybe there is a better navigation possible?

Joerg

Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Joerg Heinicke wrote:
> 
>>A few days ago I divided the livesites list into three parts: 1.x, 2.0, 
>>2.1 and committed them to their corresponding CVS module. The first 
>>reason was to lower the maintenance effort, the second the length of the 
>>list.
>>
>>Now we only have one page on top level. Shall I revert the segmentation?
>>
> 
> Ups, haven't noticed that. Sorry, I think a segmentation is not bad, but
> I think we should have this segmentation on the top-level rather than
> in the different "version cvs modules". Which means, put the segmentation
> into the cocoon-site module.
> 
> Carsten

RE: cvs commit: cocoon-site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/news archives.xml index.xml

Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@s-und-n.de>.
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
> 
> A few days ago I divided the livesites list into three parts: 1.x, 2.0, 
> 2.1 and committed them to their corresponding CVS module. The first 
> reason was to lower the maintenance effort, the second the length of the 
> list.
> 
> Now we only have one page on top level. Shall I revert the segmentation?
> 
Ups, haven't noticed that. Sorry, I think a segmentation is not bad, but
I think we should have this segmentation on the top-level rather than
in the different "version cvs modules". Which means, put the segmentation
into the cocoon-site module.

Carsten