You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Dmitriy Pavlov (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/03/14 12:16:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-7692) affinityCall and affinityRun may execute code on backup partitions

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16398483#comment-16398483 ] 

Dmitriy Pavlov commented on IGNITE-7692:
----------------------------------------

Who can help with this issue? Is it a priority?

> affinityCall and affinityRun may execute code on backup partitions
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-7692
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7692
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: sql
>    Affects Versions: 2.1
>            Reporter: Alexey Goncharuk
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: MakeTeamcityGreenAgain, Muted_test, usability
>             Fix For: 2.5
>
>
> Apparently, the affinityCall and affinityRun methods reserve partitions and check their state to be OWNING, however, if topology changes and partition role is changed to backup from primary, the code is still executed.
> This can be an issue if a user executes a local SQL query inside the affinityCall runnable. In this case, the query result may return null.
> This can be observed in the IgniteCacheLockPartitionOnAffinityRunTest#getPersonsCountSingleCache - note an additional check I've added to make the test pass.
> I think it is ok to have an old semantics for the API, because in some cases (scan query, local gets) a backup OWNER is enough. However, it looks like we need to add another API method to enforce that affinity run be executed on primary nodes and forbid primary role change.
> Another option is to detect a topology version of the affinity run and use that version for local SQL queries.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)