You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@archiva.apache.org by Joakim Erdfelt <jo...@erdfelt.com> on 2008/02/18 20:05:03 UTC
Jira merge versions.
I'd like to merge a few older released versions together in Jira (to
help in reducing the noise on some of the reports.)
What I'd like to do ...
Take versions:
* 0.9
* 1.0-alpha-1
* 1.0-alpha-2
* 1.0-beta-1
* 1.0-beta-2
* 1.0-beta-3
* 1.0-beta-4
And merge them into:
* 1.0
Any objections?
- Joakim
Re: Jira merge versions.
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On Feb 18, 2008 12:05 PM, Joakim Erdfelt <jo...@erdfelt.com> wrote:
> I'd like to merge a few older released versions together in Jira (to
> help in reducing the noise on some of the reports.)
I don't think issues for 0.9 should be merged into 1.0-- it's a
different codebase.
--
Wendy
Re: Jira merge versions.
Posted by Joakim Erdfelt <jo...@erdfelt.com>.
Archiving the version might accomplish the same thing.
I see some checkboxes to exclude archived versions in the reports.
(heh, still spelling "archive" wrong)
As for reports, I can't find perma-links for most of them.
But here's an example: http://urltea.com/2qf2
- Joakim
Brett Porter wrote:
> I'm unsure. I'd definitely leave 0.9 out on it's own regardless.
>
> I kind of like the idea of merging, but I also hate to irreversibly
> lose information :)
>
> Does archiving the alpha/beta releases achieve what you need? What is
> the noise in the reports you are referring to?
>
> Thanks,
> Brett
>
> On 19/02/2008, at 6:05 AM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
>
>> I'd like to merge a few older released versions together in Jira (to
>> help in reducing the noise on some of the reports.)
>>
>> What I'd like to do ...
>>
>> Take versions:
>> * 0.9
>> * 1.0-alpha-1
>> * 1.0-alpha-2
>> * 1.0-beta-1
>> * 1.0-beta-2
>> * 1.0-beta-3
>> * 1.0-beta-4
>>
>> And merge them into:
>> * 1.0
>>
>> Any objections?
>>
>> - Joakim
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>
Re: Jira merge versions.
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
I'm unsure. I'd definitely leave 0.9 out on it's own regardless.
I kind of like the idea of merging, but I also hate to irreversibly
lose information :)
Does archiving the alpha/beta releases achieve what you need? What is
the noise in the reports you are referring to?
Thanks,
Brett
On 19/02/2008, at 6:05 AM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
> I'd like to merge a few older released versions together in Jira (to
> help in reducing the noise on some of the reports.)
>
> What I'd like to do ...
>
> Take versions:
> * 0.9
> * 1.0-alpha-1
> * 1.0-alpha-2
> * 1.0-beta-1
> * 1.0-beta-2
> * 1.0-beta-3
> * 1.0-beta-4
>
> And merge them into:
> * 1.0
>
> Any objections?
>
> - Joakim
--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/