You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@groovy.apache.org by "Paul King (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/04/16 05:33:00 UTC
[jira] [Resolved] (GROOVY-7464) Iterable.intersect() is not
commutative (and allows duplicates)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Paul King resolved GROOVY-7464.
-------------------------------
Resolution: Won't Fix
Assignee: Paul King
I am going to close this. There is now a Set-based version of intersect and the argument-flipping "optimisation" has been removed which makes the operation much more understandable.
> Iterable.intersect() is not commutative (and allows duplicates)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GROOVY-7464
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7464
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: groovy-jdk
> Affects Versions: 2.4.3
> Reporter: Peter Ledbrook
> Assignee: Paul King
> Priority: Major
>
> The {{intersect()}} method on {{Iterable}} has different results depending on the order of the receiver object and the argument. For example,
> {code}
> def a = [1, 1, 2, 4]
> def b = [1, 2, 2, 3]
> println a.intersect(b)
> println b.intersect(a)
> {code}
> prints out two different results ({{[1, 1, 2]}} and {{[1, 2, 2]}}).
> Assuming that the operation should be commutative, i.e. the results should be the same for both, the question then becomes whether duplicates should even be returned at all.
> I think the method should always return a set as intersection is a set operation. In other words, {{Iterable.intersect()}} becomes a convenience wrapper that converts the receiver object and the argument to sets.
> This issue started as a discussion on the [dev mailing list|http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-groovy-dev/201506.mbox/browser].
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)