RE: FAQ change and James enhancements [Was Re: Outgoing mail problem)

[Anthony Buckton <ab...@blackink.net.au>]

Hi All,

HyperSonic works wonderfully. After having hassles with some of the 
file store during some of my early configs, I switched on HyperSonic 
and never went back...

I actually now use the HyperSonic in "Server Mode" running in its own 
JVM outside of the Avalon JVM - This allows me to stop the email 
processing and analyse/manipulate the data if needed. It wasn't that 
easy under Avalon (and I wasn't all that fussed trying to work out 
Avalon)..

Regards,

Anthony

At 06:56 PM 25/08/2002 +0100, Danny Angus wrote...

> > http://jakarta.apache.org/avalon/apps/apps/hsql/index.html).  Since 
> we
> > already have a requirement on an Avalon container (Phoenix) for 
> James, it
> > didn't seem unreasonable to switch to a pure Java SQL engine from a 
> pure
> > Java file system.  As I recall, someone recently posted the XML 
> changes
> > necessary for some version of James to work with Hypersonic 
> SQL.  Just a
> > thought for consideration.
>
>By all measn support HyperSonic as well, lets not drop filesystem as a
>default.
>
>
> > By the time those are layered onto a file system driver, we
> > might end up accidentally building a database layer.
>
>Not quite sure how you work that out.
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, 
>e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>For additional commands, e-mail: 
><ma...@jakarta.apache.org>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>