You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@fluss.apache.org by "Prajwal-banakar (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2026/03/20 06:10:29 UTC
[PR] [client][fix] Deduplicate insertIfNotExists lookups with same key in same batch to prevent deadlock [fluss]
Prajwal-banakar opened a new pull request, #2907:
URL: https://github.com/apache/fluss/pull/2907
<!--
*Thank you very much for contributing to Fluss - we are happy that you want to help us improve Fluss. To help the community review your contribution in the best possible way, please go through the checklist below, which will get the contribution into a shape in which it can be best reviewed.*
## Contribution Checklist
- Make sure that the pull request corresponds to a [GitHub issue](https://github.com/apache/fluss/issues). Exceptions are made for typos in JavaDoc or documentation files, which need no issue.
- Name the pull request in the format "[component] Title of the pull request", where *[component]* should be replaced by the name of the component being changed. Typically, this corresponds to the component label assigned to the issue (e.g., [kv], [log], [client], [flink]). Skip *[component]* if you are unsure about which is the best component.
- Fill out the template below to describe the changes contributed by the pull request. That will give reviewers the context they need to do the review.
- Make sure that the change passes the automated tests, i.e., `mvn clean verify` passes.
- Each pull request should address only one issue, not mix up code from multiple issues.
**(The sections below can be removed for hotfixes or typos)**
-->
### Purpose
<!-- Linking this pull request to the issue -->
Linked issue: close #2874
<!-- What is the purpose of the change -->
When `lookup.insert-if-not-exists=true` and `lookup.async=true`, multiple lookups for the same key can land in the same `LookupBatch` within a single drain cycle. The server acquires a row-level latch per key during insert —
two entries for the same key in one RPC batch cause a deadlock in the server-side handler, leaving `LookupQuery` futures never completed and hanging the `AsyncWaitOperator` indefinitely, resulting in a 60s timeout.
This did not affect `async=false` because sync lookups execute sequentially via `.get()`, so the same key never appears twice in one drain cycle.
### Brief change log
<!-- Please describe the changes made in this pull request and explain how they address the issue -->
- In `LookupSender.sendLookupRequest`, when `insertIfNotExists=true`, duplicate lookups for the same key bytes within the same batch are detected using `ByteBuffer` key comparison. The duplicate's future is chained to the first lookup's future instead of being added to the RPC batch, ensuring only one server-side entry is sent per unique key per drain cycle.
### Tests
<!-- List UT and IT cases to verify this change -->
- `Flink119TableSourceITCase#testLookupInsertIfNotExists` (existing test, previously flaky with `async=true`, now passes consistently with `-Dsurefire.rerunFailingTestsCount=5`)
### API and Format
<!-- Does this change affect API or storage format -->
No API or storage format changes.
### Documentation
<!-- Does this change introduce a new feature -->
No new feature introduced. Bug fix only.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@fluss.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] [client][fix] Deduplicate insertIfNotExists lookups with same key in same batch to prevent deadlock [fluss]
Posted by "Prajwal-banakar (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
Prajwal-banakar commented on PR #2907:
URL: https://github.com/apache/fluss/pull/2907#issuecomment-4810711616
@luoyuxia could you please help review this?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@fluss.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org