You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@johnzon.apache.org by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID> on 2016/11/22 18:50:13 UTC
which version for JSON-P-1.1 release?
subject says it all ;)
I suspect we go 1.0 for our next mainstream version.
What version do we like to use for our JSON-P 1.1 work?
This effectively also means that we move to Java8, so do we like to use
a.) johnzon-1.1
or
b.) johnzon-2.0
LieGrue,
strub
Re: which version for JSON-P-1.1 release?
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Is 1.1 already stable? If so any works but id do a 1.0 before or at the
same time.
Le 22 nov. 2016 20:09, "Mark Struberg" <st...@yahoo.de.invalid> a écrit :
> following bval I'd rather name it 1.1 and evenutally propagate the current
> master and do a release for 'prospect' reasons? ;)
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 22.11.2016 um 19:56 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
> >:
> >
> > 2016-11-22 19:50 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
> >
> >> subject says it all ;)
> >>
> >> I suspect we go 1.0 for our next mainstream version.
> >> What version do we like to use for our JSON-P 1.1 work?
> >> This effectively also means that we move to Java8, so do we like to use
> >>
> >> a.) johnzon-1.1
> >> or
> >> b.) johnzon-2.0
> >>
> >>
> > would be consistent with our "EE" tracking/following and like any asf
> > project so less misleading IMO assuming we have 1.0
> >
> > ...but we never got a 1.0 so abis) 1.0
> >
> > would that make sense?
> >
> >
> >> LieGrue,
> >> strub
> >>
>
>
Re: which version for JSON-P-1.1 release?
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID>.
following bval I'd rather name it 1.1 and evenutally propagate the current master and do a release for 'prospect' reasons? ;)
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 22.11.2016 um 19:56 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>
> 2016-11-22 19:50 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
>
>> subject says it all ;)
>>
>> I suspect we go 1.0 for our next mainstream version.
>> What version do we like to use for our JSON-P 1.1 work?
>> This effectively also means that we move to Java8, so do we like to use
>>
>> a.) johnzon-1.1
>> or
>> b.) johnzon-2.0
>>
>>
> would be consistent with our "EE" tracking/following and like any asf
> project so less misleading IMO assuming we have 1.0
>
> ...but we never got a 1.0 so abis) 1.0
>
> would that make sense?
>
>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
Re: which version for JSON-P-1.1 release?
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
2016-11-22 19:50 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
> subject says it all ;)
>
> I suspect we go 1.0 for our next mainstream version.
> What version do we like to use for our JSON-P 1.1 work?
> This effectively also means that we move to Java8, so do we like to use
>
> a.) johnzon-1.1
> or
> b.) johnzon-2.0
>
>
would be consistent with our "EE" tracking/following and like any asf
project so less misleading IMO assuming we have 1.0
...but we never got a 1.0 so abis) 1.0
would that make sense?
> LieGrue,
> strub
>