You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@activemq.apache.org by "Justin Bertram (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/01/23 17:09:00 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (ARTEMIS-1408) FindBugs: Synchronization on java.util.concurrent objects in MQTTSessionState.java

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Justin Bertram resolved ARTEMIS-1408.
-------------------------------------
       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 2.5.0

> FindBugs: Synchronization on java.util.concurrent objects in MQTTSessionState.java
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-1408
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1408
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Broker, MQTT
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.0
>            Reporter: Jiri Daněk
>            Assignee: Justin Bertram
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.5.0
>
>
> {noformat}
> 82   boolean addSubscription(MqttTopicSubscription subscription, WildcardConfiguration wildcardConfiguration) {
>    	
> CID 1419151 (#1 of 1): JLM: Synchronization on java.util.concurrent objects (FB.JLM_JSR166_UTILCONCURRENT_MONITORENTER)
> 1. defect: Synchronization performed on java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.
>  83      synchronized (subscriptions) {
>  84         addressMessageMap.putIfAbsent(MQTTUtil.convertMQTTAddressFilterToCore(subscription.topicName(), wildcardConfiguration), new ConcurrentHashMap<Long, Integer>());
>  85
>  86         MqttTopicSubscription existingSubscription = subscriptions.get(subscription.topicName());
>  87         if (existingSubscription != null) {
>  88            if (subscription.qualityOfService().value() > existingSubscription.qualityOfService().value()) {
>  89               subscriptions.put(subscription.topicName(), subscription);
>  90               return true;
>  91            }
>  92         } else {
>  93            subscriptions.put(subscription.topicName(), subscription);
>  94            return true;
>  95         }
>  96      }
>  97      return false;
>  98   }
>  99
> {noformat}
> {noformat}
> 100   void removeSubscription(String address) {
>    	
> CID 1419085 (#1 of 1): JLM: Synchronization on java.util.concurrent objects (FB.JLM_JSR166_UTILCONCURRENT_MONITORENTER)
> 1. defect: Synchronization performed on java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.
> 101      synchronized (subscriptions) {
> 102         subscriptions.remove(address);
> 103         addressMessageMap.remove(address);
> 104      }
> 105   }
> {noformat}
> {quote}
> JLM: Synchronization performed on util.concurrent instance (JLM_JSR166_UTILCONCURRENT_MONITORENTER)
> This method performs synchronization an object that is an instance of a class from the java.util.concurrent package (or its subclasses). Instances of these classes have their own concurrency control mechanisms that are orthogonal to the synchronization provided by the Java keyword synchronized. For example, synchronizing on an AtomicBoolean will not prevent other threads from modifying the AtomicBoolean.
> Such code may be correct, but should be carefully reviewed and documented, and may confuse people who have to maintain the code at a later date.
> {quote}
> http://findbugs.sourceforge.net/bugDescriptions.html#JLM_JSR166_UTILCONCURRENT_MONITORENTER



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)