You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "Xiao Li (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/11/11 21:22:58 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-18415) Weird Plan Output when CTE used in RunnableCommand

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Xiao Li updated SPARK-18415:
----------------------------
    Description: 
Currently, when CTE is used in RunnableCommand, the Analyzer does not replace the logical node `With`. The child plan of RunnableCommand is not resolved. However, the output of the `With` plan node looks very confusing.

For example, 
{code}
sql("CREATE VIEW cte_view AS WITH w AS (SELECT 1 AS n) SELECT n FROM w").explain()
{code}

The output is like
{code}
ExecutedCommand
   +- CreateViewCommand `w`, WITH w AS (SELECT 1 AS n) SELECT n FROM w, false, false, org.apache.spark.sql.execution.command.PersistedView$@2251b87b
         +- 'With [(w,SubqueryAlias w
               +- Project [1 AS n#16]
                  +- OneRowRelation$
               )]
            +- 'Project ['n]
               +- 'UnresolvedRelation `w`
{code}

  was:
Currently, when CTE is used in RunnableCommand, the Analyzer does not replace the logical node `With`. The child plan of RunnableCommand is not resolved. However, the output of the `With` plan node looks very confusing.

the plan output looks weird. 
{code}
ExecutedCommand
   +- CreateViewCommand `w`, WITH w AS (SELECT 1 AS n) SELECT n FROM w, false, false, org.apache.spark.sql.execution.command.PersistedView$@2251b87b
         +- 'With [(w,SubqueryAlias w
               +- Project [1 AS n#16]
                  +- OneRowRelation$
               )]
            +- 'Project ['n]
               +- 'UnresolvedRelation `w`
{code}


> Weird Plan Output when CTE used in RunnableCommand
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-18415
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18415
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions: 2.1.0
>            Reporter: Xiao Li
>            Assignee: Xiao Li
>
> Currently, when CTE is used in RunnableCommand, the Analyzer does not replace the logical node `With`. The child plan of RunnableCommand is not resolved. However, the output of the `With` plan node looks very confusing.
> For example, 
> {code}
> sql("CREATE VIEW cte_view AS WITH w AS (SELECT 1 AS n) SELECT n FROM w").explain()
> {code}
> The output is like
> {code}
> ExecutedCommand
>    +- CreateViewCommand `w`, WITH w AS (SELECT 1 AS n) SELECT n FROM w, false, false, org.apache.spark.sql.execution.command.PersistedView$@2251b87b
>          +- 'With [(w,SubqueryAlias w
>                +- Project [1 AS n#16]
>                   +- OneRowRelation$
>                )]
>             +- 'Project ['n]
>                +- 'UnresolvedRelation `w`
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org