You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@accumulo.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/09/24 14:46:40 UTC
[GitHub] [accumulo] milleruntime opened a new issue #1713: Standalone ITs failing due to new compaction changes
milleruntime opened a new issue #1713:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/1713
**Describe the bug**
Multiple ITs are now failing when run as a Standalone cluster due to recent changes with compactions. Related to #1084
**Versions (OS, Maven, Java, and others, as appropriate):**
- Defaults configured with Accumulo 2.*
**To Reproduce**
Run the ITs against a standalone cluster. Directions can be found in TESTING.md
**Additional context**
The following ITs have compaction related failures:
- org.apache.accumulo.test.IteratorEnvIT
- org.apache.accumulo.test.RecoveryCompactionsAreFlushesIT
- org.apache.accumulo.test.UserCompactionStrategyIT
- org.apache.accumulo.test.functional.CompactionIT
- org.apache.accumulo.test.functional.MasterMetricsIT
- org.apache.accumulo.test.functional.SummaryIT
- org.apache.accumulo.test.TableOperationsIT
Most of the failures are likely caused by a ClassNotFoundException. Here are the missing classes:
- Failed to load constraints 4k java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.accumulo.test.constraints.NumericValueConstraint
- java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.accumulo.test.IteratorEnvIT$ScanIter
- java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.accumulo.test.SampleIT$IteratorThatUsesSample
- java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.accumulo.test.functional.AuthsIterator
- java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.accumulo.test.functional.BadCombiner
- java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.accumulo.test.functional.BadIterator
- java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.accumulo.test.functional.DropModIter
- java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.accumulo.test.functional.SlowIterator
- java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.accumulo.test.functional.SummaryIT$BigSummarizer
- java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.accumulo.test.functional.SummaryIT$BuggySummarizer
- java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.accumulo.test.functional.SummaryIT$FooCounter
- java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.accumulo.test.functional.SummaryIT$KeySizeSummarizer
- java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.accumulo.test.functional.YieldingIterator
- java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.bogus.iterator
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [accumulo] EdColeman commented on issue #1713: Standalone ITs failing due to new compaction changes
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
EdColeman commented on issue #1713:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/1713#issuecomment-700039843
Some of those tests - MasterMetricsIT may be failing if the stand-alone is not configured to generate metrics (metrics prop file on the class path)
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [accumulo] milleruntime commented on issue #1713: Standalone ITs failing due to new compaction changes
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
milleruntime commented on issue #1713:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/1713#issuecomment-699086452
I don't think its feasible to change the parent class of these ITs away from ```AccumuloClusterHarness```. There is a lot of ```MiniAccumuloCluster``` baked into that type, everything is based on whether its a MINI or STANDALONE cluster type. We may be able to just override the cluster type to MINI for ITs that we know won't run on a Standalone cluster. I will look into that.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [accumulo] ctubbsii closed issue #1713: Standalone ITs failing due to new compaction changes
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
ctubbsii closed issue #1713:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/1713
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [accumulo] milleruntime commented on issue #1713: Standalone ITs failing due to new compaction changes
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
milleruntime commented on issue #1713:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/1713#issuecomment-698397425
> Is it possible these tests are no longer suitable for Standalone mode? I have not seen failures during a regular build. Perhaps they merely need to have their JUnit Category annotation updated?
Yes that's definitely possible. I was thinking that looking at all the ITs now failing in #1084. It looks like the contents of ```AccumuloClusterHarness``` are mainly for dealing with a Standalone cluster. Perhaps a lot of the ITs could extend ```AccumuloITBase``` instead. This may be a lot of work though.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [accumulo] milleruntime commented on issue #1713: Standalone ITs failing due to new compaction changes
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
milleruntime commented on issue #1713:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/1713#issuecomment-700246669
I discovered that a lot of the ITs that were failing due to missing classes will run in standalone if you simply copy the test jar into the accumulo lib folder of the running instance. This may allow some of these ITs to run in standalone mode. I will have to re-run them with the test jar present.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [accumulo] milleruntime commented on issue #1713: Standalone ITs failing due to new compaction changes
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
milleruntime commented on issue #1713:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/1713#issuecomment-698397425
> Is it possible these tests are no longer suitable for Standalone mode? I have not seen failures during a regular build. Perhaps they merely need to have their JUnit Category annotation updated?
Yes that's definitely possible. I was thinking that looking at all the ITs now failing in #1084. It looks like the contents of ```AccumuloClusterHarness``` are mainly for dealing with a Standalone cluster. Perhaps a lot of the ITs could extend ```AccumuloITBase``` instead. This may be a lot of work though.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [accumulo] milleruntime commented on issue #1713: Standalone ITs failing due to new compaction changes
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
milleruntime commented on issue #1713:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/1713#issuecomment-699089984
Looks like we already have that power!
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/blob/618ba7a9f88342ea7c8d692ce19df34d88bf07c8/test/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/harness/AccumuloClusterHarness.java#L366
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [accumulo] ctubbsii commented on issue #1713: Standalone ITs failing due to new compaction changes
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
ctubbsii commented on issue #1713:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/1713#issuecomment-698394686
Is it possible these tests are no longer suitable for Standalone mode? I have not seen failures during a regular build. Perhaps they merely need to have their JUnit Category annotation updated?
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [accumulo] ctubbsii commented on issue #1713: Standalone ITs failing due to new compaction changes
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
ctubbsii commented on issue #1713:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/1713#issuecomment-698394686
Is it possible these tests are no longer suitable for Standalone mode? I have not seen failures during a regular build. Perhaps they merely need to have their JUnit Category annotation updated?
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org