You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@spark.apache.org by Ashish Soni <as...@gmail.com> on 2016/02/18 16:13:32 UTC

SPARK-9559

Hi All ,

Just wanted to know if there is any work around or resolution for below
issue in Stand alone mode

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9559

Ashish

Re: SPARK-9559

Posted by Igor Berman <ig...@gmail.com>.

what are you trying to solve?
killing worker jvm is like killing yarn node manager...why would you do
this?
usually worker jvm is "agent" on each worker machine which opens executors
per each application, so it doesn't works hard or has big memory footprint
yes it can fail, but it rather corner situation which also might be handled
with monitoring/automatic restarts etc

On 18 February 2016 at 17:21, Daniel Darabos <
daniel.darabos@lynxanalytics.com> wrote:

> YARN may be a workaround.
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Ashish Soni <as...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All ,
>>
>> Just wanted to know if there is any work around or resolution for below
>> issue in Stand alone mode
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9559
>>
>> Ashish
>>
>
>

Re: SPARK-9559

Posted by Daniel Darabos <da...@lynxanalytics.com>.

YARN may be a workaround.

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Ashish Soni <as...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi All ,
>
> Just wanted to know if there is any work around or resolution for below
> issue in Stand alone mode
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9559
>
> Ashish
>

Re: SPARK-9559

Posted by Daniel Darabos <da...@lynxanalytics.com>.

YARN may be a workaround.

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Ashish Soni <as...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi All ,
>
> Just wanted to know if there is any work around or resolution for below
> issue in Stand alone mode
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9559
>
> Ashish
>