You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "stack (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/02/26 06:24:14 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6580) New HTable pool, based on HBase(byte[], HConnection, ExecutorService) constructor

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13586788#comment-13586788 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-6580:
------------------------------

[~lhofhansl] We going to remove broke HTablePool for 0.96?
                
> New HTable pool, based on HBase(byte[], HConnection, ExecutorService) constructor
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-6580
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6580
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.92.2, 0.94.2
>            Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.96.0, 0.94.6
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-6580_v1.patch, HBASE-6580_v2.patch
>
>
> Here I propose a very simple TablePool.
> It could be called LightHTablePool (or something - if you have a better name).
> Internally it would maintain an HConnection and an Executor service and each invocation of getTable(...) would create a new HTable and close() would just close it.
> In testing I find this more light weight than HTablePool and easier to monitor in terms of resources used.
> It would hardly be more than a few dozen lines of code.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira