You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@manifoldcf.apache.org by Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> on 2011/12/06 15:10:25 UTC
ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating release
Hi all,
I think we're just about done with ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating. There's
one ticket outstanding that belongs to Erlend, but I'm happy to
postpone it if he is not yet ready to work on it. Once that's
decided, is there any reason we should not go ahead and spin a release
candidate? Does anyone want to volunteer to run some of the load
tests to be sure nothing unexpected has crept in?
Thanks!
Karl
Re: ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating release
Posted by Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com>.
I did add mention of all the jars added by the Alfresco connector to
the LICENSE.txt file, and in one case to the NOTICE.txt file as well.
Karl
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Tommaso Teofili
<to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am taking a look at the stuff regarding licenses and the like for the
> Alfresco connector (help from Jukka would be appreciated here) which I'd
> like to see included in the next release.
> Tommaso
>
> 2011/12/6 Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com>
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I think we're just about done with ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating. There's
>> one ticket outstanding that belongs to Erlend, but I'm happy to
>> postpone it if he is not yet ready to work on it. Once that's
>> decided, is there any reason we should not go ahead and spin a release
>> candidate? Does anyone want to volunteer to run some of the load
>> tests to be sure nothing unexpected has crept in?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Karl
>>
Re: ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating release
Posted by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>.
I am taking a look at the stuff regarding licenses and the like for the
Alfresco connector (help from Jukka would be appreciated here) which I'd
like to see included in the next release.
Tommaso
2011/12/6 Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com>
> Hi all,
>
> I think we're just about done with ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating. There's
> one ticket outstanding that belongs to Erlend, but I'm happy to
> postpone it if he is not yet ready to work on it. Once that's
> decided, is there any reason we should not go ahead and spin a release
> candidate? Does anyone want to volunteer to run some of the load
> tests to be sure nothing unexpected has crept in?
>
> Thanks!
> Karl
>
Re: ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating release
Posted by Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com>.
Uh oh, the alfresco test blows up. Created ticket CONNECTORS-308 to cover it.
Karl
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Erlend wants to postpone his remaining ticket, so I did that, and now
> there are none left...
> I think running some tests on trunk is a good idea. Then if Tommaso
> is happy with my license file checks, I'm happy to spin an RC0.
>
> Karl
>
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I think we're just about done with ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating. There's
>> one ticket outstanding that belongs to Erlend, but I'm happy to
>> postpone it if he is not yet ready to work on it. Once that's
>> decided, is there any reason we should not go ahead and spin a release
>> candidate? Does anyone want to volunteer to run some of the load
>> tests to be sure nothing unexpected has crept in?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Karl
Re: ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating release
Posted by Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com>.
Erlend wants to postpone his remaining ticket, so I did that, and now
there are none left...
I think running some tests on trunk is a good idea. Then if Tommaso
is happy with my license file checks, I'm happy to spin an RC0.
Karl
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think we're just about done with ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating. There's
> one ticket outstanding that belongs to Erlend, but I'm happy to
> postpone it if he is not yet ready to work on it. Once that's
> decided, is there any reason we should not go ahead and spin a release
> candidate? Does anyone want to volunteer to run some of the load
> tests to be sure nothing unexpected has crept in?
>
> Thanks!
> Karl