You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/07/06 21:27:11 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9286) SolrCloud RTG: psuedo-fields (like
ValueSourceAugmenter, [shard], etc...) silently fails (even for committed
doc)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15365129#comment-15365129 ]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9286:
-------------------------------------------------------
Commit fee9526208375fec6a7651249b182fbca1a29703 in lucene-solr's branch refs/heads/branch_6x from Chris Hostetter
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=fee9526 ]
SOLR-9180: More comprehensive tests of psuedo-fields for RTG and SolrCloud requests
This commit also includes new @AwaitsFix'ed tests for the following known issues...
* SOLR-9285 ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException when ValueSourceAugmenter used with RTG on uncommitted doc
* SOLR-9286 SolrCloud RTG: psuedo-fields (like ValueSourceAugmenter, [shard], etc...) silently fails (even for committed doc)
* SOLR-9287 single node RTG: NPE if score is requested
* SOLR-9288 RTG: fl=[docid] silently missing for uncommitted docs
* SOLR-9289 SolrCloud RTG: fl=[docid] silently ignored for all docs
(cherry picked from commit ae316f1e39e58d89758f997913a38059d74ccb47)
> SolrCloud RTG: psuedo-fields (like ValueSourceAugmenter, [shard], etc...) silently fails (even for committed doc)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-9286
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9286
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Hoss Man
>
> Found in SOLR-9180 testing.
> when using RTG with ValueSourceAugmenter (ie: field aliasing or functions in the fl) in SolrCloud, the request can succeed w/o actually performing the field aliasing and/or ValueSourceAugmenter additions.
> This is inconsistent with single-node solr installs (at least as far as committed docs go, see SOLR-9285 regarding uncommitted docs)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org