You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by Rick Hillegas <ri...@oracle.com> on 2010/11/29 17:07:51 UTC
[VOTE] 10.7.1.1 release
Please test-drive the 10.7.1.1 candidate, then vote on whether to accept
it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at:
http://people.apache.org/~rhillegas/10.7.1.1/
The polls close at 5:00 pm San Francisco time on Monday, December 13.
10.7.1.1 is the second candidate for the 10.7.1 release, described in
greater detail here: http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTenSevenOneRelease
Thanks in advance for testing this second candidate.
Regards,
-Rick
Re: [VOTE] 10.7.1.1 release
Posted by Bryan Pendleton <bp...@gmail.com>.
On 11/29/2010 08:07 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
> Please test-drive the 10.7.1.1 candidate, then vote on whether to accept it as a Derby release.
+1. Thanks Rick for all the hard work on this release! I am
comfortable moving forward with it.
bryan
Re: [VOTE] 10.7.1.1 release
Posted by Mike Matrigali <mi...@sbcglobal.net>.
Rick Hillegas wrote:
> Please test-drive the 10.7.1.1 candidate, then vote on whether to accept
> it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at:
>
+1 for releasing this candidate.
Re: [VOTE] 10.7.1.1 release
Posted by Knut Anders Hatlen <kn...@oracle.com>.
Rick Hillegas <ri...@oracle.com> writes:
> Please test-drive the 10.7.1.1 candidate, then vote on whether to
> accept it as a Derby release.
+1
--
Knut Anders
Re: [VOTE] 10.7.1.1 release
Posted by Myrna van Lunteren <m....@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Rick Hillegas <ri...@oracle.com> wrote:
> Please test-drive the 10.7.1.1 candidate, then vote on whether to accept it
> as a Derby release.
>
+1 to make this a Derby release.
Myrna
Re: [VOTE] 10.7.1.1 release
Posted by Dag Wanvik <da...@oracle.com>.
I ran the regression tests on my Vista Ultimate SP2 box last night but did not see any evidence of the directory deletion issues.
I am +1 to move forward with the release.
Dag
Den 10. des. 2010 kl. 14:59 skrev Rick Hillegas <ri...@oracle.com>:
> +1
>
> I would like the user community to enjoy and stress the significant improvements in 10.7.1.1 now.
>
> We still need to analyze a cluster of new bugs having to do with database deletion during test runs on Windows platforms: DERBY-4922, DERBY-4916, DERBY-4915, DERBY-4905. I think that there is a small chance that these defects are caused by a minor product regression--the workarounds would be simple. I believe it is more likely that these are instabilities in the tests themselves.
>
> Regards,
> -Rick
>
> On 11/29/10 8:07 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
>> Please test-drive the 10.7.1.1 candidate, then vote on whether to accept it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~rhillegas/10.7.1.1/
>>
>> The polls close at 5:00 pm San Francisco time on Monday, December 13.
>>
>> 10.7.1.1 is the second candidate for the 10.7.1 release, described in greater detail here: http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTenSevenOneRelease
>>
>> Thanks in advance for testing this second candidate.
>>
>> Regards,
>> -Rick
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] 10.7.1.1 release
Posted by Rick Hillegas <ri...@oracle.com>.
+1
I would like the user community to enjoy and stress the significant
improvements in 10.7.1.1 now.
We still need to analyze a cluster of new bugs having to do with
database deletion during test runs on Windows platforms: DERBY-4922,
DERBY-4916, DERBY-4915, DERBY-4905. I think that there is a small chance
that these defects are caused by a minor product regression--the
workarounds would be simple. I believe it is more likely that these are
instabilities in the tests themselves.
Regards,
-Rick
On 11/29/10 8:07 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
> Please test-drive the 10.7.1.1 candidate, then vote on whether to
> accept it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rhillegas/10.7.1.1/
>
> The polls close at 5:00 pm San Francisco time on Monday, December 13.
>
> 10.7.1.1 is the second candidate for the 10.7.1 release, described in
> greater detail here:
> http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTenSevenOneRelease
>
> Thanks in advance for testing this second candidate.
>
> Regards,
> -Rick
>
>
Re: [VOTE] 10.7.1.1 release
Posted by Kim Haase <ca...@oracle.com>.
+1
Documentation looks good.
Kim
On 11/29/10 11:07 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
> Please test-drive the 10.7.1.1 candidate, then vote on whether to accept
> it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rhillegas/10.7.1.1/
>
> The polls close at 5:00 pm San Francisco time on Monday, December 13.
>
> 10.7.1.1 is the second candidate for the 10.7.1 release, described in
> greater detail here:
> http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTenSevenOneRelease
>
> Thanks in advance for testing this second candidate.
>
> Regards,
> -Rick
>
>
Re: [VOTE] 10.7.1.1 release
Posted by Rick Hillegas <ri...@oracle.com>.
Kathey Marsden wrote:
> On 11/29/2010 9:22 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Hi Kathey,
>>
>> Thanks for looking into this issue. My sense is that this problem
>> affects upgrades to 10.5 and 10.6 as well as 10.7. Is that your
>> understanding?
> It affects upgrade from 10.3 to 10.5. I do not yet know what other
> upgrade paths have exposure.
> The class OldRoutineType was introduced in 10.4 with DERBY-2775. I
> just tried upgrade with URLClassLoader and could not pop the bug, so
> more work is needed to isolate it.
>
> Kathey
>
>
>
>
>
Thanks for that extra information, Kathey. If this is not a regression
introduced by 10.7, then I would not be inclined to make this a
showstopper unless we believe that 10.7 makes this problem worse. I can
see that the bug may be a high priority issue for 10.7.2 or 10.8.
Thanks,
-Rick
Re: [VOTE] 10.7.1.1 release
Posted by Kathey Marsden <km...@sbcglobal.net>.
On 11/29/2010 9:22 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
>>
>>
>
> Hi Kathey,
>
> Thanks for looking into this issue. My sense is that this problem
> affects upgrades to 10.5 and 10.6 as well as 10.7. Is that your
> understanding?
It affects upgrade from 10.3 to 10.5. I do not yet know what other
upgrade paths have exposure.
The class OldRoutineType was introduced in 10.4 with DERBY-2775. I just
tried upgrade with URLClassLoader and could not pop the bug, so more
work is needed to isolate it.
Kathey
Re: [VOTE] 10.7.1.1 release
Posted by Rick Hillegas <ri...@oracle.com>.
Kathey Marsden wrote:
> On 11/29/2010 8:07 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
>> Please test-drive the 10.7.1.1 candidate, then vote on whether to
>> accept it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~rhillegas/10.7.1.1/
> Hi Rick,
>
> I am working today on trying to narrow down a pretty ugly looking
> upgrade issue, (10.3 to 10.5) which I filed as DERBY-4913. I don't
> have a local reproduction yet or know if any real corruption has
> occurred with the StreamCorruptedException. It reproduces reliably
> in the user environment though and may be related to upgrade with a
> custom class loader.
>
> I thought I would mention it though as it seems worthy of evaluation
> to determine if it is a show stopper for the release. Sorry I didn't
> send this info out Wednesday. Somehow I got it into my head that the
> new RC was coming out at 5pm today.
>
>
> Kathey
>
>
>
>
>
Hi Kathey,
Thanks for looking into this issue. My sense is that this problem
affects upgrades to 10.5 and 10.6 as well as 10.7. Is that your
understanding?
Thanks,
-Rick
Re: [VOTE] 10.7.1.1 release
Posted by Kathey Marsden <km...@sbcglobal.net>.
On 11/29/2010 8:07 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
> Please test-drive the 10.7.1.1 candidate, then vote on whether to
> accept it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rhillegas/10.7.1.1/
Hi Rick,
I am working today on trying to narrow down a pretty ugly looking
upgrade issue, (10.3 to 10.5) which I filed as DERBY-4913. I don't have
a local reproduction yet or know if any real corruption has occurred
with the StreamCorruptedException. It reproduces reliably in the user
environment though and may be related to upgrade with a custom class loader.
I thought I would mention it though as it seems worthy of evaluation to
determine if it is a show stopper for the release. Sorry I didn't send
this info out Wednesday. Somehow I got it into my head that the new RC
was coming out at 5pm today.
Kathey