You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Volodymyr Siedlecki <vo...@apache.org> on 2024/06/11 19:47:11 UTC
Re: MyFaces last 2.3.X 2.3.-next release?
Hello,
Sorry for the long delay. I'm starting to get results for the 2.3.11-snapshot back.
Current tests that fail:
ee.jakarta.ee4j8.cts.liberty_fat.jsf_api_javax_faces_application FAT tests
com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.api.javax_faces.application.resource.URLClient
resourceGetRequestPathLibTest
resourceGetRequestPathTest
resourceToStringTest
com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.api.javax_faces.application.resourcewrapper.URLClient
resourceWrapperGetRequestPathLibTest
resourceWrapperGetRequestPathTest
ee.jakarta.ee4j8.cts.liberty_fat.jsf_spec FAT tests
com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.ajax.keyword.URLClient
ajaxAllKeywordTest
ajaxFormKeywordTest
ajaxNoneKeywordTest
ajaxThisKeywordTest
com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.ajax.tagwrapper.URLClient
ajaxTagWrappingTest
com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.render.commandlink.URLClient
clinkRenderDecodeTest
clinkRenderEncodeTest
clinkRenderPassthroughTest
com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.view.protectedview.URLClient
viewProtectedViewSameWebAppAccessTest
The latter test seems to fail because of JavaScript. For example:
AssertionFailure: test result: Failed. Test case throws exception: com.gargoylesoftware.htmlunit.ScriptException: syntax error (script in http://localhost:9080/jsf_render_clink_web/faces/encodetest.jsp from (16, 213) to (99, 1)#22)
test result: Failed. Test case throws exception: com.gargoylesoftware.htmlunit.ScriptException: syntax error (script in http://localhost:9080/jsf_render_clink_web/faces/encodetest.jsp from (16, 213) to (99, 1)#22)
The rest of the tests should finish up later in the day.
Thanks,
Volodymyr
On 2024/05/08 17:49:46 Volodymyr Siedlecki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been focused on one other work, but I'm shifting priorities and am starting to look into a release.
>
> I'm first running the TCK against the current 2.3.11 snapshot. I'll share the results once I have them.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Volodymyr
>
> On 2024/04/22 14:59:55 Melloware Inc wrote:
> > Thank you for looking into this!
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 10:39 AM Volodymyr Siedlecki <vo...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I can look into doing releases for both.
> > >
> > > Only concern I have is that there may be TCK failures in the current 2.3
> > > branch. I tried to do a release sometime last year, but discovered a number
> > > of failures. I'll run another build with teh current snapshot to see if
> > > there are still there.
> > >
> > > Although, it's possible the failures may have been infrastructure/network
> > > related?
> > >
> > > I'll let you know more once I found out.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Volodymyr
> > >
> > > On 2024/04/22 13:56:54 Melloware Inc wrote:
> > > > Hey team,
> > > >
> > > > I know we are slowing down stopping on the 2.3.x branch but one last
> > > > release since it's been a year would be great. We have one bug with
> > > > PrimeFaces around SearchExpressions which has been fixed but not released
> > > > in 2.3 and 2.3-next that is going to cause a lot of heartache upgrading
> > > to
> > > > PF14.
> > > >
> > > > Volodymyr, I know this burden is on you and sorry in advance for
> > > asking. I
> > > > know the effort it takes.
> > > >
> > > > Mello
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > ==============================
> > > > Melloware
> > > > mellowaredev@gmail.com
> > > > http://melloware.com
> > > > ==============================
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ==============================
> > Melloware
> > mellowaredev@gmail.com
> > http://melloware.com
> > ==============================
> >
>
Re: MyFaces last 2.3.X 2.3.-next release?
Posted by Werner Punz <we...@gmail.com>.
2.3 does not have the new TS code, it still is based on the old code.
But for maintenance reasons, some code was dropped which was not used
anymore, aka
branches covering blackberry behavior and other outdated browsers!
I doubt they are the reasons for the TCK failure, but if there is one
caused by JS we have to look into it.
Am Mi., 12. Juni 2024 um 15:24 Uhr schrieb Volodymyr Siedlecki <
volosied@apache.org>:
> The 2.3.x JS code was updated here:
>
> https://github.com/apache/myfaces/pull/451
>
> However, I think the TCK failures are caused by simple errors, not newer
> syntax.
>
> Volodymyr
>
> On 2024/06/11 21:31:23 Thomas Andraschko wrote:
> > 2.3.x shouldnt have new js code, right?
> >
> > Melloware Inc <me...@gmail.com> schrieb am Di., 11. Juni 2024,
> 22:37:
> >
> > > I think these HTMLUnit ones are related to the new JS code and I think
> the
> > > tests have been updated in newer TCK's to not use HTMLUnit i think.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 3:47 PM Volodymyr Siedlecki <
> volosied@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >> Sorry for the long delay. I'm starting to get results for the
> > >> 2.3.11-snapshot back.
> > >>
> > >> Current tests that fail:
> > >>
> > >> ee.jakarta.ee4j8.cts.liberty_fat.jsf_api_javax_faces_application FAT
> tests
> > >> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.api.javax_faces.application.resource.URLClient
> > >> resourceGetRequestPathLibTest
> > >> resourceGetRequestPathTest
> > >> resourceToStringTest
> > >>
> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.api.javax_faces.application.resourcewrapper.URLClient
> > >> resourceWrapperGetRequestPathLibTest
> > >> resourceWrapperGetRequestPathTest
> > >> ee.jakarta.ee4j8.cts.liberty_fat.jsf_spec FAT tests
> > >> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.ajax.keyword.URLClient
> > >> ajaxAllKeywordTest
> > >> ajaxFormKeywordTest
> > >> ajaxNoneKeywordTest
> > >> ajaxThisKeywordTest
> > >> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.ajax.tagwrapper.URLClient
> > >> ajaxTagWrappingTest
> > >> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.render.commandlink.URLClient
> > >> clinkRenderDecodeTest
> > >> clinkRenderEncodeTest
> > >> clinkRenderPassthroughTest
> > >> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.view.protectedview.URLClient
> > >> viewProtectedViewSameWebAppAccessTest
> > >>
> > >> The latter test seems to fail because of JavaScript. For example:
> > >>
> > >> AssertionFailure: test result: Failed. Test case throws exception:
> > >> com.gargoylesoftware.htmlunit.ScriptException: syntax error (script in
> > >> http://localhost:9080/jsf_render_clink_web/faces/encodetest.jsp from
> > >> (16, 213) to (99, 1)#22)
> > >> test result: Failed. Test case throws exception:
> > >> com.gargoylesoftware.htmlunit.ScriptException: syntax error (script in
> > >> http://localhost:9080/jsf_render_clink_web/faces/encodetest.jsp from
> > >> (16, 213) to (99, 1)#22)
> > >>
> > >> The rest of the tests should finish up later in the day.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Volodymyr
> > >>
> > >> On 2024/05/08 17:49:46 Volodymyr Siedlecki wrote:
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > I've been focused on one other work, but I'm shifting priorities
> and am
> > >> starting to look into a release.
> > >> >
> > >> > I'm first running the TCK against the current 2.3.11 snapshot. I'll
> > >> share the results once I have them.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> >
> > >> > Volodymyr
> > >> >
> > >> > On 2024/04/22 14:59:55 Melloware Inc wrote:
> > >> > > Thank you for looking into this!
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 10:39 AM Volodymyr Siedlecki <
> > >> volosied@apache.org>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Hi,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > I can look into doing releases for both.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Only concern I have is that there may be TCK failures in the
> > >> current 2.3
> > >> > > > branch. I tried to do a release sometime last year, but
> discovered
> > >> a number
> > >> > > > of failures. I'll run another build with teh current snapshot
> to
> > >> see if
> > >> > > > there are still there.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Although, it's possible the failures may have been
> > >> infrastructure/network
> > >> > > > related?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > I'll let you know more once I found out.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Best,
> > >> > > > Volodymyr
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On 2024/04/22 13:56:54 Melloware Inc wrote:
> > >> > > > > Hey team,
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > I know we are slowing down stopping on the 2.3.x branch but
> one
> > >> last
> > >> > > > > release since it's been a year would be great. We have one bug
> > >> with
> > >> > > > > PrimeFaces around SearchExpressions which has been fixed but
> not
> > >> released
> > >> > > > > in 2.3 and 2.3-next that is going to cause a lot of heartache
> > >> upgrading
> > >> > > > to
> > >> > > > > PF14.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Volodymyr, I know this burden is on you and sorry in advance
> for
> > >> > > > asking. I
> > >> > > > > know the effort it takes.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Mello
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > --
> > >> > > > > ==============================
> > >> > > > > Melloware
> > >> > > > > mellowaredev@gmail.com
> > >> > > > > http://melloware.com
> > >> > > > > ==============================
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > ==============================
> > >> > > Melloware
> > >> > > mellowaredev@gmail.com
> > >> > > http://melloware.com
> > >> > > ==============================
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > ==============================
> > > Melloware
> > > mellowaredev@gmail.com
> > > http://melloware.com
> > > ==============================
> > >
> >
>
Re: MyFaces last 2.3.X 2.3.-next release?
Posted by Volodymyr Siedlecki <vo...@apache.org>.
The 2.3.x JS code was updated here:
https://github.com/apache/myfaces/pull/451
However, I think the TCK failures are caused by simple errors, not newer syntax.
Volodymyr
On 2024/06/11 21:31:23 Thomas Andraschko wrote:
> 2.3.x shouldnt have new js code, right?
>
> Melloware Inc <me...@gmail.com> schrieb am Di., 11. Juni 2024, 22:37:
>
> > I think these HTMLUnit ones are related to the new JS code and I think the
> > tests have been updated in newer TCK's to not use HTMLUnit i think.
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 3:47 PM Volodymyr Siedlecki <vo...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Sorry for the long delay. I'm starting to get results for the
> >> 2.3.11-snapshot back.
> >>
> >> Current tests that fail:
> >>
> >> ee.jakarta.ee4j8.cts.liberty_fat.jsf_api_javax_faces_application FAT tests
> >> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.api.javax_faces.application.resource.URLClient
> >> resourceGetRequestPathLibTest
> >> resourceGetRequestPathTest
> >> resourceToStringTest
> >> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.api.javax_faces.application.resourcewrapper.URLClient
> >> resourceWrapperGetRequestPathLibTest
> >> resourceWrapperGetRequestPathTest
> >> ee.jakarta.ee4j8.cts.liberty_fat.jsf_spec FAT tests
> >> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.ajax.keyword.URLClient
> >> ajaxAllKeywordTest
> >> ajaxFormKeywordTest
> >> ajaxNoneKeywordTest
> >> ajaxThisKeywordTest
> >> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.ajax.tagwrapper.URLClient
> >> ajaxTagWrappingTest
> >> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.render.commandlink.URLClient
> >> clinkRenderDecodeTest
> >> clinkRenderEncodeTest
> >> clinkRenderPassthroughTest
> >> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.view.protectedview.URLClient
> >> viewProtectedViewSameWebAppAccessTest
> >>
> >> The latter test seems to fail because of JavaScript. For example:
> >>
> >> AssertionFailure: test result: Failed. Test case throws exception:
> >> com.gargoylesoftware.htmlunit.ScriptException: syntax error (script in
> >> http://localhost:9080/jsf_render_clink_web/faces/encodetest.jsp from
> >> (16, 213) to (99, 1)#22)
> >> test result: Failed. Test case throws exception:
> >> com.gargoylesoftware.htmlunit.ScriptException: syntax error (script in
> >> http://localhost:9080/jsf_render_clink_web/faces/encodetest.jsp from
> >> (16, 213) to (99, 1)#22)
> >>
> >> The rest of the tests should finish up later in the day.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Volodymyr
> >>
> >> On 2024/05/08 17:49:46 Volodymyr Siedlecki wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I've been focused on one other work, but I'm shifting priorities and am
> >> starting to look into a release.
> >> >
> >> > I'm first running the TCK against the current 2.3.11 snapshot. I'll
> >> share the results once I have them.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > Volodymyr
> >> >
> >> > On 2024/04/22 14:59:55 Melloware Inc wrote:
> >> > > Thank you for looking into this!
> >> > >
> >> > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 10:39 AM Volodymyr Siedlecki <
> >> volosied@apache.org>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Hi,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I can look into doing releases for both.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Only concern I have is that there may be TCK failures in the
> >> current 2.3
> >> > > > branch. I tried to do a release sometime last year, but discovered
> >> a number
> >> > > > of failures. I'll run another build with teh current snapshot to
> >> see if
> >> > > > there are still there.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Although, it's possible the failures may have been
> >> infrastructure/network
> >> > > > related?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I'll let you know more once I found out.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Best,
> >> > > > Volodymyr
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On 2024/04/22 13:56:54 Melloware Inc wrote:
> >> > > > > Hey team,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I know we are slowing down stopping on the 2.3.x branch but one
> >> last
> >> > > > > release since it's been a year would be great. We have one bug
> >> with
> >> > > > > PrimeFaces around SearchExpressions which has been fixed but not
> >> released
> >> > > > > in 2.3 and 2.3-next that is going to cause a lot of heartache
> >> upgrading
> >> > > > to
> >> > > > > PF14.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Volodymyr, I know this burden is on you and sorry in advance for
> >> > > > asking. I
> >> > > > > know the effort it takes.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Mello
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > --
> >> > > > > ==============================
> >> > > > > Melloware
> >> > > > > mellowaredev@gmail.com
> >> > > > > http://melloware.com
> >> > > > > ==============================
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > ==============================
> >> > > Melloware
> >> > > mellowaredev@gmail.com
> >> > > http://melloware.com
> >> > > ==============================
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > ==============================
> > Melloware
> > mellowaredev@gmail.com
> > http://melloware.com
> > ==============================
> >
>
Re: MyFaces last 2.3.X 2.3.-next release?
Posted by Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>.
2.3.x shouldnt have new js code, right?
Melloware Inc <me...@gmail.com> schrieb am Di., 11. Juni 2024, 22:37:
> I think these HTMLUnit ones are related to the new JS code and I think the
> tests have been updated in newer TCK's to not use HTMLUnit i think.
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 3:47 PM Volodymyr Siedlecki <vo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Sorry for the long delay. I'm starting to get results for the
>> 2.3.11-snapshot back.
>>
>> Current tests that fail:
>>
>> ee.jakarta.ee4j8.cts.liberty_fat.jsf_api_javax_faces_application FAT tests
>> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.api.javax_faces.application.resource.URLClient
>> resourceGetRequestPathLibTest
>> resourceGetRequestPathTest
>> resourceToStringTest
>> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.api.javax_faces.application.resourcewrapper.URLClient
>> resourceWrapperGetRequestPathLibTest
>> resourceWrapperGetRequestPathTest
>> ee.jakarta.ee4j8.cts.liberty_fat.jsf_spec FAT tests
>> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.ajax.keyword.URLClient
>> ajaxAllKeywordTest
>> ajaxFormKeywordTest
>> ajaxNoneKeywordTest
>> ajaxThisKeywordTest
>> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.ajax.tagwrapper.URLClient
>> ajaxTagWrappingTest
>> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.render.commandlink.URLClient
>> clinkRenderDecodeTest
>> clinkRenderEncodeTest
>> clinkRenderPassthroughTest
>> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.view.protectedview.URLClient
>> viewProtectedViewSameWebAppAccessTest
>>
>> The latter test seems to fail because of JavaScript. For example:
>>
>> AssertionFailure: test result: Failed. Test case throws exception:
>> com.gargoylesoftware.htmlunit.ScriptException: syntax error (script in
>> http://localhost:9080/jsf_render_clink_web/faces/encodetest.jsp from
>> (16, 213) to (99, 1)#22)
>> test result: Failed. Test case throws exception:
>> com.gargoylesoftware.htmlunit.ScriptException: syntax error (script in
>> http://localhost:9080/jsf_render_clink_web/faces/encodetest.jsp from
>> (16, 213) to (99, 1)#22)
>>
>> The rest of the tests should finish up later in the day.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Volodymyr
>>
>> On 2024/05/08 17:49:46 Volodymyr Siedlecki wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I've been focused on one other work, but I'm shifting priorities and am
>> starting to look into a release.
>> >
>> > I'm first running the TCK against the current 2.3.11 snapshot. I'll
>> share the results once I have them.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Volodymyr
>> >
>> > On 2024/04/22 14:59:55 Melloware Inc wrote:
>> > > Thank you for looking into this!
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 10:39 AM Volodymyr Siedlecki <
>> volosied@apache.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > >
>> > > > I can look into doing releases for both.
>> > > >
>> > > > Only concern I have is that there may be TCK failures in the
>> current 2.3
>> > > > branch. I tried to do a release sometime last year, but discovered
>> a number
>> > > > of failures. I'll run another build with teh current snapshot to
>> see if
>> > > > there are still there.
>> > > >
>> > > > Although, it's possible the failures may have been
>> infrastructure/network
>> > > > related?
>> > > >
>> > > > I'll let you know more once I found out.
>> > > >
>> > > > Best,
>> > > > Volodymyr
>> > > >
>> > > > On 2024/04/22 13:56:54 Melloware Inc wrote:
>> > > > > Hey team,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I know we are slowing down stopping on the 2.3.x branch but one
>> last
>> > > > > release since it's been a year would be great. We have one bug
>> with
>> > > > > PrimeFaces around SearchExpressions which has been fixed but not
>> released
>> > > > > in 2.3 and 2.3-next that is going to cause a lot of heartache
>> upgrading
>> > > > to
>> > > > > PF14.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Volodymyr, I know this burden is on you and sorry in advance for
>> > > > asking. I
>> > > > > know the effort it takes.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Mello
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > ==============================
>> > > > > Melloware
>> > > > > mellowaredev@gmail.com
>> > > > > http://melloware.com
>> > > > > ==============================
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > ==============================
>> > > Melloware
>> > > mellowaredev@gmail.com
>> > > http://melloware.com
>> > > ==============================
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
> --
> ==============================
> Melloware
> mellowaredev@gmail.com
> http://melloware.com
> ==============================
>
Re: MyFaces last 2.3.X 2.3.-next release?
Posted by Melloware Inc <me...@gmail.com>.
I think these HTMLUnit ones are related to the new JS code and I think the
tests have been updated in newer TCK's to not use HTMLUnit i think.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 3:47 PM Volodymyr Siedlecki <vo...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sorry for the long delay. I'm starting to get results for the
> 2.3.11-snapshot back.
>
> Current tests that fail:
>
> ee.jakarta.ee4j8.cts.liberty_fat.jsf_api_javax_faces_application FAT tests
> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.api.javax_faces.application.resource.URLClient
> resourceGetRequestPathLibTest
> resourceGetRequestPathTest
> resourceToStringTest
> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.api.javax_faces.application.resourcewrapper.URLClient
> resourceWrapperGetRequestPathLibTest
> resourceWrapperGetRequestPathTest
> ee.jakarta.ee4j8.cts.liberty_fat.jsf_spec FAT tests
> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.ajax.keyword.URLClient
> ajaxAllKeywordTest
> ajaxFormKeywordTest
> ajaxNoneKeywordTest
> ajaxThisKeywordTest
> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.ajax.tagwrapper.URLClient
> ajaxTagWrappingTest
> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.render.commandlink.URLClient
> clinkRenderDecodeTest
> clinkRenderEncodeTest
> clinkRenderPassthroughTest
> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.view.protectedview.URLClient
> viewProtectedViewSameWebAppAccessTest
>
> The latter test seems to fail because of JavaScript. For example:
>
> AssertionFailure: test result: Failed. Test case throws exception:
> com.gargoylesoftware.htmlunit.ScriptException: syntax error (script in
> http://localhost:9080/jsf_render_clink_web/faces/encodetest.jsp from (16,
> 213) to (99, 1)#22)
> test result: Failed. Test case throws exception:
> com.gargoylesoftware.htmlunit.ScriptException: syntax error (script in
> http://localhost:9080/jsf_render_clink_web/faces/encodetest.jsp from (16,
> 213) to (99, 1)#22)
>
> The rest of the tests should finish up later in the day.
>
> Thanks,
> Volodymyr
>
> On 2024/05/08 17:49:46 Volodymyr Siedlecki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been focused on one other work, but I'm shifting priorities and am
> starting to look into a release.
> >
> > I'm first running the TCK against the current 2.3.11 snapshot. I'll
> share the results once I have them.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Volodymyr
> >
> > On 2024/04/22 14:59:55 Melloware Inc wrote:
> > > Thank you for looking into this!
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 10:39 AM Volodymyr Siedlecki <
> volosied@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I can look into doing releases for both.
> > > >
> > > > Only concern I have is that there may be TCK failures in the current
> 2.3
> > > > branch. I tried to do a release sometime last year, but discovered a
> number
> > > > of failures. I'll run another build with teh current snapshot to
> see if
> > > > there are still there.
> > > >
> > > > Although, it's possible the failures may have been
> infrastructure/network
> > > > related?
> > > >
> > > > I'll let you know more once I found out.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Volodymyr
> > > >
> > > > On 2024/04/22 13:56:54 Melloware Inc wrote:
> > > > > Hey team,
> > > > >
> > > > > I know we are slowing down stopping on the 2.3.x branch but one
> last
> > > > > release since it's been a year would be great. We have one bug with
> > > > > PrimeFaces around SearchExpressions which has been fixed but not
> released
> > > > > in 2.3 and 2.3-next that is going to cause a lot of heartache
> upgrading
> > > > to
> > > > > PF14.
> > > > >
> > > > > Volodymyr, I know this burden is on you and sorry in advance for
> > > > asking. I
> > > > > know the effort it takes.
> > > > >
> > > > > Mello
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > ==============================
> > > > > Melloware
> > > > > mellowaredev@gmail.com
> > > > > http://melloware.com
> > > > > ==============================
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > ==============================
> > > Melloware
> > > mellowaredev@gmail.com
> > > http://melloware.com
> > > ==============================
> > >
> >
>
--
==============================
Melloware
mellowaredev@gmail.com
http://melloware.com
==============================