You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@apache.org> on 2007/08/14 00:32:37 UTC
[VOTE] Using Gentleware Poseidon UML tool
Hi guys,
we have discussed with the Gentleware company about using their UML tool
(Poseidon) for those who are interested. I know that they are many UML
tools out there, but at least this one has a community edition which can
be used bu us, and as I used it a lot for state machine design and class
diagrams (
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxASN1/LdapCodec,
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/32460/class_diagram.png),
I would say that it's a cool UML tool.
So now, we need to know about your feeling !
[ ] +1 Let's use Poseidon UML as our UML tool
[ ] +/- 0 I dont' really care, or I will still use my favorite tool (for
which I have a personnal license)
[ ] -1 I disagree with this choice.
The idea is to be able to store the schemas in a common format (possibly
XMI) so that anybody can open them and modify them.
It's up to you now !
Emmanuel
Re: [VOTE] Using Gentleware Poseidon UML tool
Posted by Stefan Seelmann <se...@apache.org>.
+1
Emmanuel Lecharny schrieb:
> Hi guys,
>
> we have discussed with the Gentleware company about using their UML tool
> (Poseidon) for those who are interested. I know that they are many UML
> tools out there, but at least this one has a community edition which can
> be used bu us, and as I used it a lot for state machine design and class
> diagrams (
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxASN1/LdapCodec,
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/32460/class_diagram.png),
> I would say that it's a cool UML tool.
>
> So now, we need to know about your feeling !
>
> [ ] +1 Let's use Poseidon UML as our UML tool
> [ ] +/- 0 I dont' really care, or I will still use my favorite tool (for
> which I have a personnal license)
> [ ] -1 I disagree with this choice.
>
> The idea is to be able to store the schemas in a common format (possibly
> XMI) so that anybody can open them and modify them.
>
> It's up to you now !
>
> Emmanuel
Re: [VOTE] Using Gentleware Poseidon UML tool
Posted by Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>.
+1
On 8/13/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> > [X] +1 Let's use Poseidon UML as our UML tool
>
> Obviously !
>
> > Emmanuel
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Using Gentleware Poseidon UML tool
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@apache.org>.
> [X] +1 Let's use Poseidon UML as our UML tool
Obviously !
> Emmanuel
>
Re: [VOTE] Using Gentleware Poseidon UML tool
Posted by Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net>.
[X] +1 Let's use Poseidon UML as our UML tool
Cheers,
P-A
On 8/14/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> we have discussed with the Gentleware company about using their UML tool
> (Poseidon) for those who are interested. I know that they are many UML
> tools out there, but at least this one has a community edition which can
> be used bu us, and as I used it a lot for state machine design and class
> diagrams (
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxASN1/LdapCodec,
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/32460/class_diagram.png
> ),
> I would say that it's a cool UML tool.
>
> So now, we need to know about your feeling !
>
> [ ] +1 Let's use Poseidon UML as our UML tool
> [ ] +/- 0 I dont' really care, or I will still use my favorite tool (for
> which I have a personnal license)
> [ ] -1 I disagree with this choice.
>
> The idea is to be able to store the schemas in a common format (possibly
> XMI) so that anybody can open them and modify them.
>
> It's up to you now !
>
> Emmanuel
>
Re: [VOTE] Using Gentleware Poseidon UML tool
Posted by Chris Custine <cc...@apache.org>.
Hi Guys,
+1 on using this tool.
Chris
On 8/14/07, Stefan Zoerner <sz...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>
> > [ ] +1 Let's use Poseidon UML as our UML tool
> > [ ] +/- 0 I dont' really care, or I will still use my favorite tool (for
> > which I have a personnal license)
> > [ ] -1 I disagree with this choice.
> >
> > The idea is to be able to store the schemas in a common format (possibly
> > XMI) so that anybody can open them and modify them.
> >
> > It's up to you now !
>
> +1
>
> Greetings from Hamburg,
> Stefan
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Using Gentleware Poseidon UML tool
Posted by Stefan Zoerner <sz...@apache.org>.
Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> [ ] +1 Let's use Poseidon UML as our UML tool
> [ ] +/- 0 I dont' really care, or I will still use my favorite tool (for
> which I have a personnal license)
> [ ] -1 I disagree with this choice.
>
> The idea is to be able to store the schemas in a common format (possibly
> XMI) so that anybody can open them and modify them.
>
> It's up to you now !
+1
Greetings from Hamburg,
Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Using Gentleware Poseidon UML tool
Posted by Christine Koppelt <ch...@googlemail.com>.
+1
2007/8/14, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@apache.org>:
> Hi guys,
>
> we have discussed with the Gentleware company about using their UML tool
> (Poseidon) for those who are interested. I know that they are many UML
> tools out there, but at least this one has a community edition which can
> be used bu us, and as I used it a lot for state machine design and class
> diagrams (
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxASN1/LdapCodec,
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/32460/class_diagram.png),
> I would say that it's a cool UML tool.
>
> So now, we need to know about your feeling !
>
> [ ] +1 Let's use Poseidon UML as our UML tool
> [ ] +/- 0 I dont' really care, or I will still use my favorite tool (for
> which I have a personnal license)
> [ ] -1 I disagree with this choice.
>
> The idea is to be able to store the schemas in a common format (possibly
> XMI) so that anybody can open them and modify them.
>
> It's up to you now !
>
> Emmanuel
>