You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jmeter-dev@jakarta.apache.org by Jeremy Arnold <je...@bigfoot.com> on 2003/08/18 19:45:12 UTC
"Correct" logger
Hello,
I mostly stayed on the side-lines a little while back when some of
you guys were making changes to the logging system. So now I'd like to
check: what is the "correct" way to define a logger. My guess is:
private static Logger log = LoggingManager.getLoggerForClass( );
Am I close? Do we still use
Hierarchy.getDefaultHierarchy().getLogerFor("xxx"); in some places?
Jeremy
http://xirr.com/~jeremy_a
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Running embeded Javascript from a Sampler
Posted by Don Dehm <dd...@edgenet.com>.
I am doing some research on the implementation of some tests we need to
create. We have several *.jsp pages that make use of button evoked
java-script that loads documents (as apposed to using "POST" and "GET").
Can someone provide a pointer to me that would allow the emulation of
the button press, or at least running the embedded java-script?
Thanks,
Don
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Running embeded Javascript from a Sampler
Posted by Don Dehm <dd...@edgenet.com>.
I am doing some research on the implementation of some tests we need to
create. We have several *.jsp pages that make use of button evoked
java-script that loads documents (as apposed to using "POST" and "GET").
Can someone provide a pointer to me that would allow the emulation of
the button press, or at least running the embedded java-script?
Thanks,
Don
Re: "Correct" logger
Posted by ms...@apache.org.
The correct way is:
private static Logger log = LoggingManager.getLoggerForClass()
note that in org.apache.jmeter.testelement.property I did make the
logger in AbstractProperty a protected element - and it was a
mistake to do so, it should be changed. But then, all the property
classes would need these lines added to them. Gosh, aspects
would be nice for this! If only I dared use them.
-Mike
On 18 Aug 2003 at 19:45, Jeremy Arnold wrote:
> Hello,
> I mostly stayed on the side-lines a little while back when some of
> you guys were making changes to the logging system. So now
I'd like to
> check: what is the "correct" way to define a logger. My guess is:
>
> private static Logger log = LoggingManager.getLoggerForClass(
);
>
> Am I close? Do we still use
> Hierarchy.getDefaultHierarchy().getLogerFor("xxx"); in some
places?
>
> Jeremy
> http://xirr.com/~jeremy_a
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-
unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-
help@jakarta.apache.org
>
--
Michael Stover
mstover1@apache.org
Yahoo IM: mstover_ya
ICQ: 152975688
AIM: mstover777
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: "Correct" logger
Posted by ms...@apache.org.
The correct way is:
private static Logger log = LoggingManager.getLoggerForClass()
note that in org.apache.jmeter.testelement.property I did make the
logger in AbstractProperty a protected element - and it was a
mistake to do so, it should be changed. But then, all the property
classes would need these lines added to them. Gosh, aspects
would be nice for this! If only I dared use them.
-Mike
On 18 Aug 2003 at 19:45, Jeremy Arnold wrote:
> Hello,
> I mostly stayed on the side-lines a little while back when some of
> you guys were making changes to the logging system. So now
I'd like to
> check: what is the "correct" way to define a logger. My guess is:
>
> private static Logger log = LoggingManager.getLoggerForClass(
);
>
> Am I close? Do we still use
> Hierarchy.getDefaultHierarchy().getLogerFor("xxx"); in some
places?
>
> Jeremy
> http://xirr.com/~jeremy_a
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-
unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-
help@jakarta.apache.org
>
--
Michael Stover
mstover1@apache.org
Yahoo IM: mstover_ya
ICQ: 152975688
AIM: mstover777