mail in quarantine have diferent hits from spamc

[Rejaine Monteiro <re...@bhz.jamef.com.br>]

Hi

does *not always happen, but sometimes I got this:

*this is  a spam in my quarantine folder...

<snip>
*** Qmail-Scanner Quarantine Envelope Details Begin ***
<snip>
spamassassin: 3.1.7.  SPAM Found. Processed in 2.719401 secs)
Quarantine-Description: SPAM content refused by this network (5.8/5.0)
*** Qmail-Scanner Envelope Details End **


But, if I run "spamc -R < quarantined_email", spamassin reports only 2.8 
hits for the same message...

Content analysis details:   (2.8 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- 
--------------------------------------------------
 1.1 EXTRA_MPART_TYPE       Header has extraneous Content-type:...type= 
entry
 1.2 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20     BODY: HTML: images with 1600-2000 bytes of words
 2.1 TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID1     BODY: TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID1
-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
                            [score: 0.0000]
 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
 1.0 PART_CID_STOCK         Has a spammy image attachment (by Content-ID)


Why this happens ?? How can I use sa-learn in this cases??

Re: mail in quarantine have diferent hits from spamc

[Kai Schaetzl <ma...@conactive.com>]

Rejaine Monteiro wrote on Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:28:20 -0300:

> Content analysis details:   (2.8 points, 5.0 required)

Without the other details there is no comparison possible. One possible 
explanation for the difference: your message also hit network tests. These 
may not have been carried out with this manual test. Thus the difference.

Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com