You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Sergey Chugunov (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/03/01 07:48:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-11459) Possible dead code in
TcpDiscoveryStatusCheckMessage flow
Sergey Chugunov created IGNITE-11459:
----------------------------------------
Summary: Possible dead code in TcpDiscoveryStatusCheckMessage flow
Key: IGNITE-11459
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11459
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Sergey Chugunov
Working on IGNITE-11364 I found the following suspicious detail about StatusCheck flow: in the message there is a special field {{failedNodeId}} which seems to duplicate functionality of {{failedNodes}} collection in TcpDiscoveryAbstractMessage.
{{failedNodeId}} field is filled only in special scenario of failed ping or remote node. It is used *only* to ignore the message.
Historical overview of this field revealed commit *838с0fd* where a meaningful piece of code was either intentionally removed or accidentally lost:
{noformat}
if (msg instanceof TcpDiscoveryStatusCheckMessage) {
TcpDiscoveryStatusCheckMessage msg0 = (TcpDiscoveryStatusCheckMessage)msg;
if (next.id().equals(msg0.failedNodeId())) {
next = null;
if (log.isDebugEnabled())
log.debug("Discarding status check since next node has indeed failed [next=" + next +
", msg=" + msg + ']');
// Discard status check message by exiting loop and handle failure.
break;
}
}
{noformat}
Conclusion: field {{failedNodeId}} and the whole flow around it looks suspicious and has to be reviewed for flaws. Review should result in either redesign of the flow or deleting the code.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)