You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Stefan Guggisberg (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/06/01 12:39:16 UTC
[jira] Commented: (JCR-935) ConcurrentModificationException during
logout (cont'd)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12500663 ]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on JCR-935:
---------------------------------------
are you seeing those CME's only when using the FineGrainedISMLocking strategy?
FineGrainedISMLocking is still experimental and not yet used in the trunk. see marcel's
comment where he also mentions potential issues with concurrent access to item state
caches: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-314#action_12498226
> ConcurrentModificationException during logout (cont'd)
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-935
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-935
> Project: Jackrabbit
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Affects Versions: 1.3
> Reporter: Pablo Rios
>
> I "seldom" get a CME running ConcurrentReadWriteTest.testReadWrite test.
> Following are different stack traces of two runs:
>
> Exception in thread "Thread-9" java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
> at org.apache.commons.collections.map.AbstractReferenceMap$ReferenceEntrySetIterator.checkMod(AbstractReferenceMap.java:761)
> at org.apache.commons.collections.map.AbstractReferenceMap$ReferenceEntrySetIterator.hasNext(AbstractReferenceMap.java:735)
> at org.apache.commons.collections.map.AbstractReferenceMap$ReferenceValues.toArray(AbstractReferenceMap.java:543)
> at java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableCollection.toArray(Unknown Source)
> at java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableCollection.toArray(Unknown Source)
> at org.apache.jackrabbit.core.state.LocalItemStateManager.dispose(LocalItemStateManager.java:341)
> at org.apache.jackrabbit.core.state.SessionItemStateManager.dispose(SessionItemStateManager.java:316)
> at org.apache.jackrabbit.core.SessionImpl.logout(SessionImpl.java:1269)
> at org.apache.jackrabbit.core.XASessionImpl.logout(XASessionImpl.java:379)
> at org.apache.jackrabbit.core.AbstractConcurrencyTest$Executor.run(AbstractConcurrencyTest.java:114)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
> Exception in thread "Thread-9" java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
> at org.apache.commons.collections.map.AbstractReferenceMap$ReferenceEntrySetIterator.checkMod(AbstractReferenceMap.java:761)
> at org.apache.commons.collections.map.AbstractReferenceMap$ReferenceEntrySetIterator.nextEntry(AbstractReferenceMap.java:770)
> at org.apache.commons.collections.map.AbstractReferenceMap$ReferenceValuesIterator.next(AbstractReferenceMap.java:829)
> at org.apache.commons.collections.map.AbstractReferenceMap$ReferenceValues.toArray(AbstractReferenceMap.java:544)
> at java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableCollection.toArray(Unknown Source)
> at java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableCollection.toArray(Unknown Source)
> at org.apache.jackrabbit.core.state.LocalItemStateManager.dispose(LocalItemStateManager.java:341)
> at org.apache.jackrabbit.core.state.SessionItemStateManager.dispose(SessionItemStateManager.java:316)
> at org.apache.jackrabbit.core.SessionImpl.logout(SessionImpl.java:1269)
> at org.apache.jackrabbit.core.XASessionImpl.logout(XASessionImpl.java:379)
> at org.apache.jackrabbit.core.AbstractConcurrencyTest$Executor.run(AbstractConcurrencyTest.java:114)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
> My working copy is revision 538918 with both JCR-314 patches applied, using FineGrainedISMLocking strategy.
> I run this test manually from within Eclipse 3.2.1 / JRE 1.5.0_10-b03.
> The workstation were I run this test has an Intel Dual-Core Xeon 5130 2 GHz. To able to compare this CPU with another, with the default params of this test (NUM_NODES = 5, NUM_THREADS = 5, RUN_NUM_SECONDS = 20), the number of operations are ~ #writes performed: 300-400, #reads performed: 4700000 - 4900000.
> Regards,
> Pablo
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.